True, but not randomly. I simply pointed out that software updates, at least in an enterprise environment, cannot be refused as a matter of policy because of the security implications that may be associated with them. I work in an environment that schedules Linux upgrades every month, just like Windows. It's non-negotiable.
In some ways, I do think that Microsoft is kind of taking a page out of its experience at the enterprise level and applying it to consumers. Monthly patches, forced reboots up to three days delay, no choice at by the end user. It's just amazing how the things that people complain about with Windows 10 are so close to how it gets managed in true enterprises.
Companies hire these providers though based on the fact they will never get pushed crap. There is a reason the Enterprise class Linux providers run years old kernels. (sort of the truth is they are custom kernels... as they back port support for new hardware and features that have undergone some extreme vetting)
There is no need to pick and choose which updates to install if your running RHEL or SUSE.... cause they aren't going to be upgrading home user type software like the Steam client or something.