New 3Dmark05 numbers

[OPUS1]

Want to get a feel for what is the most common numbers.
If over 6000 please post number and know that I will get there one day!

 

[joecuddles]

No more 3DMark05 threads. We have like 7. Don't need more.

 

[onetwo]

A poll is a better format for this type of thread, IMO.

I'll vote as soon as I get the new Catalyst beta drivers installed.

 

[OPUS1]

That's what I thought this poll could do, put it in one easy to read and enjoyable place.

 

[Gavinni]

x800 pro @ 585/575 no volt mod or pipe mod (hard mod failed on pipes they were defective, mad artifacts) I get 5,592 thats with an AMD 64 3200+ @ 2.4ghz

 

[Filter]

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=18706

 

[Kevin Lowe]

I agree with onetwo; if everyone posts in here, we'll have a neat little histogram of the results so we can see where we stand with a quick glance.

 

[Bumrush]

Nvidia 66.70 drivers.
Control panel settings to high performance with AA/AF disabled by driver.
400/110 on the GT.

5274

 

[lithium726]

66.00 drivers, system in sig only hte proc was at 2.4 for this.

4135... pretty much the exact same thing i was gettin in 03 with my 9600 pro. what a terrible thought

edit: in fact, its one point higher than my highest 9600 bench, lol.. just checked, was still in ORB

edit2: wish i could change my vote, after tweaking and a driver change i got 5283 much better!

 

[KillRoy X]

Me likey this poll,

me don't like my results of 3540

 

[OPUS1]

I'll reserect this one time for those that don't read past page one.
Maybe sticky for a week or two?