• Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
    Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.

nehalem vs bloomfield

I think nehalem is the family name for the architecture and Bloomfield is the codename for the current gen nehalem that serves desktop and single socket server/workstation.

I think 0.0?
 
Yeah.
Nehalem is the micro-arch, bloomfield is the 45nm s1366 quad core desktop version.
Just like Gulftown is the 32nm 6-core s1366 shrink of it.
 
Bloomfield processors are a subset of the Nehalem processors.
 
There is no such processor as "Nehalem"

As said, Nehalem is akin to Netburst, the architecture, not a processor codename.
 
considering he mentioned clock speed in the only line of his post, I think he meant nehalem vs bloomfield.
westmere is the 32nm subset of nehalem.
 
extide said:
There is no such processor as "Nehalem"

As said, Nehalem is akin to Netburst, the architecture, not a processor codename.
Click to expand...

Forgive me, but I will give you that Netburst and Nehalem share a few similarities in what it can provide, however, they're not related. Intel had originally planned to develop upon the design of Netburst, but decided to go into a all new direction.
 
He was not saying anything about netburst and nehalam being alike, just that they are both the names of a microarchitecture.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top