Right. So I have been searching articles mostly at tomshardware and a few other sites about the 939 MBs that are availible. However I can´t really se too much of a difference in performance according to my needs. Thats where I need your help because I do not know too much about which features that makes one board more suitable than the other.
I am building a new rig a and it is purely for gaming. No need to perform well in other areas. The planned specs are as follows:
Athlon 64 3000+(or 3500+)
2x512MB Dual RAM (or 4x512MB or 2x1 GB, budget depending)
Geforce 6600GT GFXcard (PCIe)
Audigy card of some sort.
Onboard devices such as sound and LAN are not needed since I am going to re-use some old parts. I´m also re-using my 2 old harddrives, DVD and burner none of which are faster than ATA-100/IDE-100 devices so the board must be backwardscompatible. Raid is not needed. Overclocking is nice, but not a requirement although a bit of clocking dosnt hurt. Nothing hardcore here
.
I am not going for SLI since I remember the Voodoo days
and the performance gains with SLI versus cost is not very impressive according to tomshardware as seen here In gaming that is, if you like I, run your games in 1024 resulotion without AA and AF turned on. I didnt check for applications. Anyway I´m not so serious that I´m going for two cards. HOWEVER I dont know if a SLI board will perform better than a non-sli even if you only used one GFX card so I´d like some advice on that too.
Now here are a few candidates I have been looking at:
1. Abit AN8 Fatal1ty
2. MSI K8N Neo4 Platinum/SLI
3. Gigabyte K8NXP-SLI
4. Epox EP-9NPA+ Ultra
5. DFI nF4 Ultra-D
There are more, but these are what I have looked at. SO which one too choose? Overclocking is nice, but dosnt need to be much. I will be running ONE gfx card so will a SLI board perform worse? I do not need onboard sound, LAN and raid. 2 PCI slots is all I need. Should be backwardscompatible with ATA100 units(and slower). Its for gaming. The choice should reflect technology & performance availible now so no need for it to be compatible with future products like dual core CPUs. I would be thankfull for any advice. It truly is a jungle these days
.
A side note: If you use the 1x and 4x PCIe slots for normal PCI expansions, do they really perform so much better that the cost of an upgrade is justifyable? Like a soundcard fx.
I am building a new rig a and it is purely for gaming. No need to perform well in other areas. The planned specs are as follows:
Athlon 64 3000+(or 3500+)
2x512MB Dual RAM (or 4x512MB or 2x1 GB, budget depending)
Geforce 6600GT GFXcard (PCIe)
Audigy card of some sort.
Onboard devices such as sound and LAN are not needed since I am going to re-use some old parts. I´m also re-using my 2 old harddrives, DVD and burner none of which are faster than ATA-100/IDE-100 devices so the board must be backwardscompatible. Raid is not needed. Overclocking is nice, but not a requirement although a bit of clocking dosnt hurt. Nothing hardcore here
I am not going for SLI since I remember the Voodoo days
Now here are a few candidates I have been looking at:
1. Abit AN8 Fatal1ty
2. MSI K8N Neo4 Platinum/SLI
3. Gigabyte K8NXP-SLI
4. Epox EP-9NPA+ Ultra
5. DFI nF4 Ultra-D
There are more, but these are what I have looked at. SO which one too choose? Overclocking is nice, but dosnt need to be much. I will be running ONE gfx card so will a SLI board perform worse? I do not need onboard sound, LAN and raid. 2 PCI slots is all I need. Should be backwardscompatible with ATA100 units(and slower). Its for gaming. The choice should reflect technology & performance availible now so no need for it to be compatible with future products like dual core CPUs. I would be thankfull for any advice. It truly is a jungle these days
A side note: If you use the 1x and 4x PCIe slots for normal PCI expansions, do they really perform so much better that the cost of an upgrade is justifyable? Like a soundcard fx.