• Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
    Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.

need help, gotta make a gift

krupted

2[H]4U
Joined
Oct 23, 2006
Messages
3,244
my brother, who couldnt be more cool, loaned me a bunch of money last winter. now is time to repay him.

i intend to repay him in full next week, but i also want to give him some interest. more cash isnt that much fun between us, as we know what we like.

my idea is a mini pc-jukebox. something with probably a 320gb harddrive, mini-itx style, low power but still runs windows (vista preferably).

do you guys think i could pull something off for $300? it doesnt have to be that fast or play games, i really just want something super small and good sounding. if i have to go to a shuttle-sized pc i feel that i might as well make him a full htpc. no monitor needed, he has a good flatscreen tv.

thanks in advance
 
I was looking at itx boards, they re not cheap. have you considered mATX ?
 
i think ill go with an atom setup, i want low low power consumption. yet i have an extra copy of vista- but not xp. you guys sure i cant use vista on that atom board?
 
i think ill go with an atom setup, i want low low power consumption. yet i have an extra copy of vista- but not xp. you guys sure i cant use vista on that atom board?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Intel_Atom_microprocessors

I don't think it can handle Vista. That's why in the Netbooks when they use Atoms, they either run Linux or XP, not Vista. It's a single core with hyperthreading technology. Thinks it's a dual core, but it's really not :)
 
i think ill go with an atom setup, i want low low power consumption. yet i have an extra copy of vista- but not xp. you guys sure i cant use vista on that atom board?

It can't handle Vista whuch is why I suggested the above.
 
i think ill go with an atom setup, i want low low power consumption. yet i have an extra copy of vista- but not xp. you guys sure i cant use vista on that atom board?

The Atom just doesn't have the processing power to run Vista. I'd highly suggest you use a Linux distro like Kbuntu + LinuxMCE if you don't want to shell out for an XP license - I'd even expect that Linux would run much better on an Atom CPU then XP would. Everything on the Atom board will be very well supported by Linux out of the box so you won't have to worry about drivers or anything, just do the install. LinuxMCE supports the Microsoft remote control as well if you wanted to pick up one of those.
 
yet i have an extra copy of vista- but not xp. you guys sure i cant use vista on that atom board?

You can use it but as everyone here has said: It will be sloooooww. This quote best sums up Vista and Atom:

Kyle Bennett said:
I have spent a good week or so using both the Atom and Nano in a Windows Vista 32-bit environment, and I can tell you now that I never want to be subjected to Atom on the desktop again. Maybe I have been spoiled by high-end processors from Intel over the last year, but Atom on the desktop is sluggish and cumbersome at best. I would hate to think of Atom without Hyperthreading, because Hyperthreading has got to be the one saving grace the Atom has when it comes to usability. On the other hand, the VIA Nano was not a speed demon either, but it allowed a tremendously more fluid and intuitive GUI experience than Atom did on the desktop. If you had to take the Pepsi Challenge, there is no doubt that a user would be able to tell a difference between the Nano and the Atom when it came to using it in Windows. The Atom was slower to react and simply took longer to accomplish simple desktop tasks.

So if you want to use Vista, CrimandEvil's setup is the better choice. If you're willing to use Linux or can find a legal copy of XP, then go with AMD_RULES' setup. Though I'd swap out that Seagate drive for a bigger, faster and slighly lower energy drive for just $10 more:
Western Digital WD6400AAKS 640GB 7200RPM SATA 3.0Gb/s Hard Drive - $85
 
You can use it but as everyone here has said: It will be sloooooww. This quote best sums up Vista and Atom:



So if you want to use Vista, CrimandEvil's setup is the better choice. If you're willing to use Linux or can find a legal copy of XP, then go with AMD_RULES' setup. Though I'd swap out that Seagate drive for a bigger, faster and slighly lower energy drive for just $10 more:
Western Digital WD6400AAKS 640GB 7200RPM SATA 3.0Gb/s Hard Drive - $85

I only listed the Seagate as a personal preference :D
 
Back
Top