Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sounds good to me!nVidias guardian angel of truth?
Originally posted by gb25
And the exceptionally more impressive Unreal3 engine was being showcased on the next gen ati hardware as well.
Originally posted by Vagrant Zero
Taken from Hardocp.com:
The gang at Pop Culture Shock confirmed the Unreal 3 demo was running on the NV40 at the Game Developers Conference (GDC). This is certainly of interest to those people planning on upgrading to the NV40 when it is released. I am surprised that no shaky-cam video of the Unreal 3.0 demo has hit the net yet.
Naturally, a current generation card wouldn't be able to show the effects of such an engine, and for that task, the NV40 was used. Upon entering the room of the showing, you couldn't help but see the sign nVidia had boasting that the technology being demoed was running on future generation nVidia technology. We have confirmed with nVidia that Unreal 3 was indeed running on the NV40 to be launched April 13.
Care to comment gb25?
Originally posted by Vagrant Zero
Care to comment gb25?
Posted by Mark Rein, VP and Co-founder of Epic Games
For the ATI cards we used systems provided directly by AMD and they were ass-kicker Athlon 64 systems built by ABS - very similar (although faster CPUs) to the great systems AMD provided for the Unreal University event.
When visiting Epics meeting room at GDC I got the chance to see their new engine on NV40 and R420.
It looked like they were showing NV40 at 640x480 and it was very choppy with very low detail.
I was very impressed with R420 as it was obviously running with a much higher framerate and at 1024x768 or higher. The details in the models was much higher and it was very smooth. The only issue I notice were some minor artifacts which Epic put down to 24-bit FP.
It was very cool to see both parts but the R420 was by far the more impressive of the two. Epic claimed they are both equal in performance but would not show me their FPS counter. I believe this was NV marketing dollars speaking because I spent 20 minutes viewing each showing and the delta was clearly evident.
Anyone else here get the chance to see both? As far as I could tell ATI is gonna rule!!!
The ATI card looked like a 9800XT using the exact same board layout. I did not see the NVidia card but rumors around the show claimed it has two power connections, requires a 500W power supply and is extremely hot. Maybe NV should bundle a power supply with the board, instead of Doom3
I can't wait to get a chance to play with an R423 and PCI Express. Hopefully ATI will send boards out to developers soon!!!
ATI was also promoting hardware Normal Map Compression. What I heard sounded extremely cool and simple to use. No specs yet though.
Originally posted by JangoFett
I saw this over at Beyond3d as well..
http://www.beyond3d.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=11124&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=0
Originally posted by gb25
Yes, and if you read more of the thread you will see Mark Rein's comments about all of the claims made in that post.
http://www.beyond3d.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=11124&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=60#245871
Originally posted by mcryptic
yes there are no AMD fanboys in the strictly AMD forum, nope, none, none at all.![]()
Originally posted by emorphien
Mark can be the queen of fucking england. If all he has to say 99% of the time is "This is bullshit" I'm not going to expect much from him and I'm only taking what he says with a grain of salt.
Originally posted by creedAMD
You can trust Mark Rein, he hates rumors, and trys to get truthful information out as quick as possible. He is very involved in trying to hear the voice from us gamers.
Originally posted by Sojuuk
barely impressed.
Originally posted by angrybusdriver
Uh, I hate to break it to you, but nVidia has fanboys too.
Originally posted by Stanley Pain
Hrrm, this is a bit disturbing.
MS "makes" one of the standards for an API (DX).
Now if we start seeing "partnerships" here, this might lead to a split in standards. Nvidia going one way ATI going another. I dunno, the outcome could get messy.
Power to ATI for landing a deal like that though. I guess MS likes ATI for following DX specs with there R3XX series.
-- just watched the videos. Pretty impressive if that's all real time. Perhaps r4xx series has hardware TruForm now?
He is very involved in trying to hear the voice from us gamers
Originally posted by sicde@th
Nvidia Vs. ATI, its like a never ending story![]()
Those videos are sweet and I am just in aww![]()
As long as either one of these cards can make my system work, I don't really care about anything else, hehe. Once the next generation of video cards are out, we will know how good they are anyway.
But damn, those videos still look sweet and that lady too![]()
-rahul
Originally posted by emorphien
To me, assuming the guy was telling the truth, when he said the demos he saw ran better on the ATI than the nVidia system, that is his truth. Not necessarily a rumor, but also not the whole story (whether he was lying is another issue).
Originally posted by M4d-K10wN
The only reason i like nVidia right now is because it has good OpenGL support. Oh, also i guess i sympathise to it because it's the underdog. If i didn't want to play so many OpenGL-based games, i would go with a 9800 pro.