Microsoft Completes $7.5B Github Acquisition

Discussion in 'HardForum Tech News' started by AlphaAtlas, Oct 26, 2018.

  1. AlphaAtlas

    AlphaAtlas [H]ard|Gawd Staff Member

    Messages:
    1,713
    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2018
    Today, Microsoft completed their acquisition of the Git hosting service Github. Microsoft payed a cool $7.5 Billion for the company, which they announced back in June. Github's co-founder and former CEO, Chris Wanstrath, is stepping down, and former Xamarin CEO Nat Friedman will start his job as head of the company today. Microsoft claims that Github will remain independent, and retain its current philosophy, but that isn't quelling everyone's fears. Back when the acquisition was announced, Gitlab experienced a massive traffic spike, as many developers feared the worst and decided to clone projects to alternative platforms.

    GitHub will operate independently as a community, platform, and business. This means that GitHub will retain its developer-first values, distinctive spirit, and open extensibility. We will always support developers in their choice of any language, license, tool, platform, or cloud. GitHub will retain its product philosophy. We love GitHub because of the deep care and thoughtfulness that goes into every facet of the developer's experience. I understand and respect this, and know that we will continue to build tasteful, snappy, polished tools that developers love.
     
  2. kju1

    kju1 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    3,036
    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2002
    Well guess its time to withdraw my application to GitHub...
     
  3. bobdabilder

    bobdabilder Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    291
    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2009
    Yep, and so begins the demise of github
     
    AceGoober likes this.
  4. The Mad Atheist

    The Mad Atheist Gawd

    Messages:
    958
    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2018
    "Microsoft claims that Github will remain independent, and retain its current philosophy"
    Start the timer, place your bets, one who comes to the closest date MS will change it, wins.
     
  5. kju1

    kju1 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    3,036
    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2002
    And if my grandmother had wheels shed be a wagon.

    Damn I seem to be saying that too much lately....I have seen these acquisitions before. It starts out that way and slowly the changes come. First they will change some small benefit to bring it in line with corporate. Eventually its all gone.
     
  6. purple_monster

    purple_monster Gawd

    Messages:
    617
    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2018
    and then, just like that- THE ULTIMATE PULL REQUEST WAS MERGED, CONFLICTS BE DAMNED.
     
  7. the-one1

    the-one1 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,982
    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2003
    One does not pay $7.5B for something to keep it as is. There's a catch. Just look at the other companies MS (or any big corporations) buys. It soon gets changed, and most of the time, not for the better for the users
     
    Crackinjahcs, B00nie and Trixar like this.
  8. heatlesssun

    heatlesssun [H]ard as it Gets

    Messages:
    44,157
    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2005
    It gets easy to generalize things an not look at situations under their own unique set of circumstances. Microsoft's development tools and platforms are generally considered very good, a tool like GitHub fits perfectly with Microsoft's development portfolio. 7.5 billion is just the cost of doing business if you're serious about development tools across the spectrum, mobile, desktop, cloud, etc.
     
  9. ManofGod

    ManofGod [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    11,152
    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2007
    Unless they shut it down like they did their Nokia Acquisition.
     
  10. arnemetis

    arnemetis 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,735
    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2004
    By 2020 no one will even remember github, as during the first half of 2019 everyone abandoned the platform for someone that isn't microsoft offering the same product. That's a hell of a gamble that everyone will just suck it up and deal with whatever new ads & fees will be incorporated to recoup that cost.
     
  11. Paladin21

    Paladin21 Gawd

    Messages:
    529
    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2004
    Nokia never made any damn sense with their waffling support of a mobile OS. Even if they wanted to go all-in on mobile, they didn't need to buy a company for that; they had their own hardware division.

    While there's no telling what might/will happen in the future, I'd say that Git should be fine for a while. You might start seeing ads for Visual Studio integration, or a plugin to merge Git with Teams, or stuff of that nature. I'd think that the basic functionality should stay the same though. Microsoft is increasingly becoming a services company; Git is a good framework to use to build value for their offerings. If it kicks subscriptions/purchases of the products that integrate it up in any noticeable fashion, it will pay for itself without requiring any further monetization/changes.
     
  12. bobdabilder

    bobdabilder Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    291
    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2009
    Yes, yes, they're doing this for us.............:eek:
     
  13. heatlesssun

    heatlesssun [H]ard as it Gets

    Messages:
    44,157
    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2005
    Never said that. Microsoft was already heavily dependent on GitHub before this acquisition. Either Microsoft was going to buy it or someone else like Google. Google owning the de facto source control system for Microsoft platforms, yeah, the 7.5 billion was just the cost of doing business.
     
  14. heatlesssun

    heatlesssun [H]ard as it Gets

    Messages:
    44,157
    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2005
    Not the same things. Microsoft failed in the handset business. It's development tools and platforms are doing very well. Something like GitHub is just a necessity in the modern development world.
     
    IdiotInCharge and ZenDragon like this.
  15. ZenDragon

    ZenDragon [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,696
    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2000
    They wont do that. Fact of the matter is GitHub is FAR superior to TFS in so many ways. They know that and have publicly admitted as much. When the .net platform source went public they made the choice to put all of that stuff in GitHub rather than TFS for a reason.
     
    heatlesssun likes this.
  16. DrBorg

    DrBorg Gawd

    Messages:
    555
    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2005
    What will happen is that a license will quietly be added that says "All you Base Belongs to Us", and they own anything you post.

    Most of their offerings include that "right to use your code".

    If you use their stuff, you ARE their code repository/developer; you just don't get paid. :(
     
    spintroniX likes this.
  17. clockdogg

    clockdogg Gawd

    Messages:
    944
    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2007
    So... the good news: Noobs on Win10 Home can now get to GitHub - personally audit the next update, pull, compile and trash their system in one seamless transaction.

    Microsoft: pushing the development envelope off the table - from transforming their base from customers into beta testers, from testy customers into clueless developers. This is how you democratize development. Well done, M$!

    ;-)
     
  18. IdiotInCharge

    IdiotInCharge [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    12,486
    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2003
    For which we're all poorer...
     
  19. Youn

    Youn [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    5,530
    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2007
    some of us saw this coming

    github-750x400.png
     
    Bcc335, Poseur, Mega6 and 10 others like this.
  20. ChoGGi

    ChoGGi [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,470
    Joined:
    May 7, 2005
    Next quarterly of course.
     
  21. toast0

    toast0 Gawd

    Messages:
    917
    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2010
    Been there, done that; hope the Githubers got a good enough paycheck.
     
  22. BloodyIron

    BloodyIron 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    3,440
    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2005
    If you want an alternative, use gitlab, includes self hosting options!
     
    IdiotInCharge likes this.
  23. CAD4466HK

    CAD4466HK [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,218
    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2008
    Aye, great Scotty quote from ST:IV.

    BOT...

    Is SourceForge still a thing? Couldn't that be used as well?
     
  24. risc

    risc Handle with Kid Gloves

    Messages:
    188
    Joined:
    May 18, 2017
    I assume Microsoft wanted a huge codebase to analyze.
     
    dgz likes this.
  25. gulguran

    gulguran Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    263
    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2015
    Look at Xamarin, that seems to have turned out pretty well, hope they don't do anything rash.
     
    IdiotInCharge and heatlesssun like this.
  26. TonyZ

    TonyZ Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    168
    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2004
    They won the lottery!
     
  27. dgz

    dgz [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    5,467
    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    So, what's the appeal of GitHub exactly? Not trying to be obtuse. I really don't get it. Host you own code, damn it.
     
  28. B00nie

    B00nie [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    8,046
    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2012
    We did immediately when the news came.
     
  29. B00nie

    B00nie [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    8,046
    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2012
    Well except they could have easily created their own Git hub instead of infiltrating the works of millions of independent developers.
     
    dgz likes this.
  30. B00nie

    B00nie [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    8,046
    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2012
    Yep it's quite trivial to host your own Git.
     
  31. StoleMyOwnCar

    StoleMyOwnCar 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,151
    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2013
    I mean for a lot of people, it's like a large portfolio of what you worked on already. It's a huge open source repository that's actually indexed, and it's done pretty well...

    The appeal probably lies somewhere in data mining, and then the usage of it is secondary. Or trying to acquire new talent before others.... probably via data mining? When they have access to all of the files, I guess they could perform some analysis that they couldn't otherwise. Tech companies seem to be hurting for talent that's actually willing to stick around (I wonder why though...).

    That's about it though, I don't know why they'd bother otherwise.

    If their takeover gets too invasive, people will just move on anyway. Creating another Github isn't exactly hard for a community of developers, so it would literally be suicide for a platform owner to alienate them. Like that's generally why people don't screw with devs by doing underhanded stuff. Someone will find out. Then they'll call you out. Then they'll make their own, and your customers are gone, and you have a terrible reputation.

    Even I could go and create my own given some time, if I cared enough.
     
  32. heatlesssun

    heatlesssun [H]ard as it Gets

    Messages:
    44,157
    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2005
    Except GitHub put itself up for sale, someone else, most likely Google, was going to buy it if Microsoft hadn't.
     
    dgz likes this.
  33. Poseur

    Poseur Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    352
    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2009
    Microsoft has to know that a lot of people don't like this. What do they think? Do they just not care? If only there were someone with credibility and integrity to talk to Microsoft's PR people and get their carefully crafted words. ;)
     
  34. heatlesssun

    heatlesssun [H]ard as it Gets

    Messages:
    44,157
    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2005
    Which matters not if Google or someone else was going to buy GitHub anyway. Not sure why people don't seem to get that GitHub put itself up for sale.
     
  35. Poseur

    Poseur Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    352
    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2009
    I still want an honest answer (I know) from Microsoft. Why do normal people mentally recoil when they hear that Microsoft is involved?
     
  36. heatlesssun

    heatlesssun [H]ard as it Gets

    Messages:
    44,157
    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2005
    Because Microsoft is a $800 billion mega-corp and the vast majority of people don't recoil when Microsoft is involved?

    To a person like me that's been using Microsoft products for 30 years, most of this shit is just nonsense. The way you describe "normal" people I should be like dead or something from using Microsoft tech for that long.
     
  37. ChoGGi

    ChoGGi [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,470
    Joined:
    May 7, 2005
    EEE? AARD Code? Claiming Linux infringes on 200+ patents? Halloween documents? OOXML? That antitrust suit? The cute tricks they played trying to get people to upgrade to win10?
     
  38. IdiotInCharge

    IdiotInCharge [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    12,486
    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2003
    So you'd say that you're a bit uh, new, to how corporations regard what they consider to be their interests?
     
  39. ChoGGi

    ChoGGi [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,470
    Joined:
    May 7, 2005
    Nah, if I spent 7.5B on acquiring a company I'd want to get my money's worth, The board is just doing what they feel is the best course of action for their interests.
     
    dgz likes this.
  40. B00nie

    B00nie [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    8,046
    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2012
    Most of you people eat Monsanto and GMO products for years, why should anyone care that it's destroying our heatlh?