How come Cyrix didn't make the list?![]()
I enjoyed that, it's basically my buying history of processors.
My favourite is still the i7 920 though, wasn't the biggest overclock by percentage (got 4.0ghz from mine) but for sheer longevity it can't be beaten. I could still use that processor today and I wouldn't be that far behind where I am with my 4770K
Still got my Rampage 3 and the i7 920 sitting in a box somewhere, I should make use of it.
The i7 920 was a beast -- and still is.
Even today and WITHOUT being overclocked, it still is more power than Haswell based i3's and even a few of the i5's. Overclocked, I wouldn't be surprised to see it still pull close to a 3770T.
I am not sure what exactly this bench measures but I use the site to see where a CPU stacks up.
TechSpot is taking a trip down memory lane today looking back at all the memorable overclocking-friendly processors. Any overclocking list that starts off with the Celeron 300A is okay in my book. That thing was a beast!![]()
Rose tinted glasses. It still feels like the Athlon 64 3800+ was one of the fastest computers I ever used but that was mainly because of what I was using before it and the upgrade after wasn't as big of a jump... so comparatively, the 3800+ is just remembered as a beast despite realistically having its arse kicked by everything I've had since.
I did get some great overclocks out of my K6-2, too, for that matter. That was a good system that lasted a while. Helped that I paired it with a Tyan board. But if I were to try to run that config now, I'd quickly go insane.
ahhhhh, nostalgia. Heh.
Turbo wasn't for overclocking in the 386 era.iirc, most 386 and 486 boards would switch between full speed and a lower speed (often 8MHz). Later chips in the Pentium era would switch between full speed and 1/2 speed. I used to hate those front panel LEDs. So many jumpers to move to make it display properly and you'd cut up your hands or fingers while doing it. A few "retro" boards far later did use a switch to control overclocking, but it never really caught on.
Most 386 chips were difficult to overclock. And you had to do all kinds of things to make the overclock stable (in coarse speed bumps... I did a 25 -> 33MHz overclock in 1989), like using a heatsink and/or a fan. Craziness!
My fave oc was a Mac G3 333 that you could pencil over the contacts and oc it. Think I got it to 400.
Had a gold finger too with a vapochill for my slot a.
I don't oc much anymore. Just set it and run it.
What? No mention of AMD's slot A and goldfingers?
I loved my old 300A, but my best memories were with a couple of 366 celeries on a Abit BP6.
Even today and WITHOUT being overclocked, it still is more power than Haswell based i3's and even a few of the i5's. Overclocked, I wouldn't be surprised to see it still pull close to a 3770T.
Celeron E1200 (LGA775) - Went from 1.6Ghz stock to 3.2Ghz. Only time I ever got a 100% overclock on a CPU.