Hitmanthe3rd
Limp Gawd
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2010
- Messages
- 459
It's a shame EA owns the right to many good games, otherwise I'd say fuck it as well. But I want BF4....and the next Dead space...And I'm sure many others.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah, this is two in a row for me. I waited for reviews on Aliens:CM and now this piece of shit. I'm 2 for 2 and it feels great.
I wish more gamers would join us.
It's a shame EA owns the right to many good games, otherwise I'd say fuck it as well. But I want BF4....and the next Dead space...And I'm sure many others.
Yeah, this is two in a row for me. I waited for reviews on Aliens:CM and now this piece of shit. I'm 2 for 2 and it feels great.
I wish more gamers would join us.
It was impossible because the model they have chosen will be based around micropayments for upgrades and expansions.
You know...all the stuff that's strangely missing in the game at the moment.
It was impossible because the model they have chosen will be based around micropayments for upgrades and expansions.
You know...all the stuff that's strangely missing in the game at the moment.
You're not kidding. Look at what someone unearthed in the code.. A stub/placeholder tile for buying a marina ($14.99 FWIW but in fairness may not be final price.. The point here is you can see where things are headed and why alienating their legacy players and refusing offline mode is apparently so important ..Farmville, meet Cityville)
http://imgur.com/25L9AZ3
But supersmart Lucy says most people want to play online.......
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-21828799
Does this woman know she's being used as a patsy by EA?
I love how they word it....they never mention that SimCity has always been a single player game. In fact they go out of their way to push they rejected "turning it into a single player game"...as though it was always a multiplayer game, and that EA weren't actually turning a single-player franchise into a multiplayer-only one.
It's nice to see someone started it. I think it was a Forbes editor or contributor. I know they have important things to take care of, but maybe they should get involved when you've got a company charging $60 bucks a pop for something that doesn't work out of the box (or DL stream) en masse. I actually can't see how more class actions don't spring up. Maybe EA quashed class actions in their terms with Origin. Not sure.
What I do know is that if they demand $60 from us to play a game then we should demand that it work when we buy it.
The answer is not to have government get involved.
The answer is for people to use their fucking heads and not buy shit that EA sells.
Fucking America. Only here do we have people crying for the gov to help them not buy defective products.
In your little world, you think the cries of a few thousand will affect the decisions of these juggernauts. They sell several million copies of their products - and if they lose a few thousand customers in order to retain and gain 100,000 more it's a win in their book.
Stay with me here, I know you might have a hard time following me here - you're insignificant.. get used it.