fadedlogic
Limp Gawd
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2016
- Messages
- 274
]
You can make an attractive female Ryder, it just takes some work.
...and squinting really hard...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
]
You can make an attractive female Ryder, it just takes some work.
When a game makes you feel as though you are in a Second Life mod, yea, that's a problem no story/gameplay can fix...How damn picky can you be?
How old is Jade Empire?!? You know what, Doom had pretty bad facial animations now that I remember.
Ya, cause I was totally referring to the facial animations in those games and not the overall quality of the games in the year that they were published.
I mean how do they get away with this shit?
At least they evoked emotion in Doom.How old is Jade Empire?!? You know what, Doom had pretty bad facial animations now that I remember.
Plus by then maybe the community modded and fixed the game for them T_TChecking.... Mass Effect: Andromeda is still $60 on Amazon.
Maybe I see the value of money differently, but... $60.... for game game? That has issues? From a problem publisher? Really?
There is a solution to that. It's called don't buy it. Wait six months. Let it drop in price. Don't be a beta tester.
Checking.... Mass Effect: Andromeda is still $60 on Amazon.
Maybe I see the value of money differently, but... $60.... for game game? That has issues? From a problem publisher? Really?
There is a solution to that. It's called don't buy it. Wait six months. Let it drop in price. Don't be a beta tester.
I always knock Manveer the fuck out.Oh well, I really didn't want to be supporting this guy buying Mass Effect anyway, even though I was going to anyway if the game was good. At least this helps me feel better about it being a flop.
Jesus, this guy is racist.Oh well, I really didn't want to be supporting this guy buying Mass Effect anyway, even though I was going to anyway if the game was good. At least this helps me feel better about it being a flop.
Isn't everyone on twitter?When has Bioware character design, modeling and animation not been terrible?
Never. OK, the first 3 games were probably the only decent ones.
Jesus, this guy is racist.
I'm sure if you called him out on it though, he would no doubt cite some made up personal definition of why he isn't a racist and that the actual definition of it doesn't apply to him or anything against white people.
Oh well, I really didn't want to be supporting this guy buying Mass Effect anyway, even though I was going to anyway if the game was good. At least this helps me feel better about it being a flop.
Sadly, the issue here is that these aren't glitches. It's actually how the game is supposed to look. It isn't so much that the facial animation is terrible, but it's largely absent, which is why it's so cringe-worthy when some actually shows up and is subpar. Biotic chick keeps the same half smile whether she's telling you that someone close to you died or is trying to crack a joke.
Facial animation is constrained to:
1) Blinking eyes
2) Moving lips
3) Occasional lifting of eyebrows
4) Occasional half smiles that immediately slide back to...
5) Resting botox/bitch face
Eyes never squint, I can count on one hand the number of times I've seen an expression of gritting teeth (and that's just pulling the lips back from the teeth, so I'm assuming they were going for gritting), no furrowed brows and there are *no* sidelong glances. It's like it was animated by someone who had read about what people looked like but had never seen them interact before.
People do all the time, as those are just a handful of his tweets, but he just doubles-down being a dick and posts stuff like the pic below... And I don't care if he's privately racist, but he's very vocal about his hate for white people and EA is cool with it, which annoys me since if it were the other way around it'd be a shitstorm.I'm sure if you called him out on it though, he would no doubt cite some made up personal definition of why he isn't a racist and that the actual definition of it doesn't apply to him or anything against white people.
They did this on purpose so they can fix it later and call it remastered and charge you for it all over again.
Jokes on him though, as "white tears" is just code for semen.
Oh well, I really didn't want to be supporting this guy buying Mass Effect anyway, even though I was going to anyway if the game was good. At least this helps me feel better about it being a flop.
I hink he's indian. But who gives a fuck about him. SJWs are attention whores. Their only goal is to virtue signal, to show how swell guys and gals they are by showing the world that they care, but they never actually do anything to help the people who they designated as victims. On the contrary they'd rather pretend and ignore the cold hard facts. Here is very good example of this:I dont get this guy. What race/nationality he identifies himself as? Because he is white himself in my eyes. Yes he has dark complexion like a latino or gypsie but they also belong in the "white" category. They are not black or asian.
I hink he's indian. But who gives a fuck about him. SJWs are attention whores. Their only goal is to virtue signal, to show how swell guys and gals they are by showing the world that they care, but they never actually do anything to help the people who they designated as victims. On the contrary they'd rather pretend and ignore the cold hard facts. Here is very good example of this:
Black people in the US commit disproportionately more crime than white people. If you tell this to an SJW prepare for instant meltdown and being labelled as a racist. But it's only a statistic. It's no more racist than saying that 99% of Japan is populated by Asians.
What would be racist is to declare that they commit more crime because they're black. But instead they choose to pretend the statistic doesn't exist and look elsewhere for the problem. Which is not helping anyone. They convinced themselves and some black people that all their problems are caused by white oppression. And the most fascist organization black lives matter was born.
They're obsessed with groups, they can't or won't view people as individuals. Which should be the norm. If a group on the whole has more power or better off, then they think every member of that group is oppressing the other group. It's completely stupid and I don't even know how did they come by such influence as they possess.
They also treat the people they're supposed to be looking out for as mindless children with no agency of their own. It's really ironic though as if you break it down then they're the ones who are sexist and racist. They think the only way for women to achieve equality is by giving them advantages over men. Which begs the question then do they believe women to be inferior to men if we must give them concessions at every turn to match men?
And their final hypocrisy is that they treat dissent or differing opinions as something to be silenced. And self confessedly if they had the power they'd silence everyone who doesn't agree with them. They don't engage in dialogue. They only want to "educate". They think that their position is the last revelation and everything else is blasphemy.
First I know exactly what fascism means and every act of sjws is a move towards a totalitarian system that would oppress or even punish every dissenting opinion, while emphasising racist propaganda and controlling all industry. Remember they want total control over every job so that they could purge undesirables from the good jobs (= white males). It's eerily close to fascism.First, I am not sure that you know what fascism means. Second, that statistic has some nuance to it that cant just be distilled down to "white people caused our problems" There are some cultural problems too, when your music and your influencers in life are constantly teaching you that you are getting a raw deal in life, that you should not trust the police. It can make a profound impact on whether or not you can function in society.
No, no no, and no. You can't blanket an entire people as "they cause it" even if you say only partly. Some white people might be responsible, but not white people as a race, or a group. That's where you cross over into racism.though denying that it has no involvement at all is false as well.
And that's exactly what I'm talking about you don't need to explain it to me. Explain it to SJWs.There are a number of societal problems that explain why black people commit a disproportionate amount of crime, or at least, are convicted and incarcerated for crimes. One being socioeconomic status and the family support network. Did they grow up in a stable family? If not, what were contributing factors? Parents had to both work two jobs and live in a bad neighborhood? Was one parent not around? Did they come from a broken home? Another would be the statistical tendency for the justice system to steer minorities toward incarceration instead of rehabilitation.
So they should ignore the statistics? They are targeted for random checks more because the statistic shows they're more likely to have something to hide. Ignoring the statistic in random searches would be highly irresponsible. If there is a rumour that a white thirties male is carrying a concealed weapon illegally, I want police to stop every one they can fitting that description. It's not racism it's common sense. This narrative that police are targeting black people because of racism is highly damaging. Not just for the police image, but for public safety. The idea that police can't target people who are more likely to commit a crime, because they have to fulfil a certain race quota when doing stop checks is ridiculous. It has nothing to do with racism, it has to do with the above mentioned statistic. The one SJW are trying to ignore. And their propaganda is what causing partly the mass incarceration of blacks. Because what propaganda do they spread? The police is out to get you even if you didn't do anything!. Police try to stop them, they resist, they flee, possible even assault police. They're landed in jail. For what? For SJW bullshit. When they could've been on their way in 5 minutes after a check.Minorities are also targeted by law enforcement with pull overs, pat downs, and questioning more often than whites.
Yes blm is a symptom allright, of racist sjw propaganda as false narratives. Again some people have culpability in it, but it's not about race it's about individuals who are responsible for the problem. Many blacks are very enlightened about the issue and know what are the real causes (ex: gang violence, broken homes, socioeconomical status, that you mentioned), so you can't say "blacks making it worse for themselves" either. Some blacks are making it worse, and others are just victims of BLM, because they say what they want to hear, instead of what is the solution.At any rate, the point I am trying to make is that an organization such as black lives matter is a symptom of a problem, one that you cannot pin to just one cause. White people do have some culpability in that problem as well as blacks making it worse for themselves.
I think you meant mischaracterizing. But no I don't think so for a minute. White SJWs who support BLM are virtue signalling. They might as well be shouting. "Hey look at me, I support BLM, look at me, I can't be racist because I support BLM!" They're just so afraid of their own racism that they'd rather label everyone else racist just to virtue signal. But I've never saw a white SJW going into the hood to see the situation for themselves. They'd rather believe in a fairyland that they constructed where the smurfs live happily and the police is Gargamel wreaking havoc amongst them. And I definitely didn't see any SJW coming up with solutions instead of pointing fingers.Also, you are grossly characterizing what those SJW peeps are all about.
Thankfully I didn't get involved in the gamergate debacle at all, for years I didn't even know what it was about. But I've seen speeches by BLM founders and leaders, and I can't say anything positive about them. They have the same stupid ideas and biases as the bottom trolls.I think what you are seeing with SJW and I guess what you would call Gamergaters is the worst trolls of both groups getting in internet brawls, making both groups look incredibly stupid.
I do. We game to get away from normal, I look at normal all my life. I don't want the same shit in my games as well. I want to see beautiful people in movies and games. I want to see heroes, and not fumbling idiots as main characters, who might as well be Eddy from the vegetable stand down the road.Look I got nothing against having normal looking people in my video games,
I don't either, in fact I'm highly in favour in most customizable characters. That way everyone can make their "hero" look like whatever they want. But somehow I never see people making ugly or even average characters, except a few cases for journalistic fun. So it's bullshit that people want to see normal in games.I got nothing against female protagonists or protagonists of a different creed, race, sexual persuasion,
Fat is not healthy, pretending that it's healthy is detrimental to society. Fat people should feel ashamed of being fat. I'm fat too, and I'm fucking ashamed of it, but I don't blame society for it. It's my responsibility. And if I wanted I could do against it. So no, fat shaming is not a thing I'm concerned with a least bit.I do have a problem if that freedom of speech fat shames women,
You know damn well that for SJWs they can't even be represented in any way. There is no right context for them. If the protagonist is good looking that's sexist, if she's bad looking that's sexist too. They're an unrealistic unappeasable bunch of wackos.is anti-any ethnic group or religion, as well as anti-LGBT as the general theme of the game, PLEASE DO NOT confuse this with having those elements present in a game, so long as they done within the context of not condoning those activities.
How can you glorify and deny it at the same time? You tried to be overly dramatic here I think. Anyhow by your standards then the tv show "Man in the High Castle" and the book it was based upon should both be banned then?If someone made a game where you play the role of a SS Nazi lieutenant that glorified the purging of Jews and denied the holocaust ever happened.
There is no such thing as freedom of speech going too far. There is either freedom of speech or there isn't. Sadly in Germany there is no freedom of speech. And in most of Europe. We shouldn't need laws for ideas. What we need is an informed public who can recognize and dismiss falsehoods. But that's a whole other discussion.That's free speech gone too far. With WW2 so long ago it is important to teach the lessons we learned to the next generation or history will repeat its mistakes. That is why you see Germany take holocaust denial so seriously and make it a crime.
And that's another topic as well. They're idiots, mostly clueless teenagers. I was among the first to denounce this which hunt. Mass Effect: Andromeda. But what disgusts me even more is bioware's reaction. Instead of protecting her, they simply shat on her by saying no, she's not working there anymore.I have a real problem with a bunch of fuckwads harassing some poor woman because she worked on the animation team for Mass effect. I also have a problem with an internet witch hunt over victory poses that flash alot of booty in overwatch. Neither are right and there is no moral high-road that you can take when resorting to that type of behavior.
Fat is not healthy, pretending that it's healthy is detrimental to society. Fat people should feel ashamed of being fat. I'm fat too, and I'm fucking ashamed of it, but I don't blame society for it. It's my responsibility. And if I wanted I could do against it. So no, fat shaming is not a thing I'm concerned with a least bit.
Why doesn't ME: A allow for modifying the default character faces? All the custom faces are hideous, while the default faces are the closest to looking like an actual person.
Also, I hope the BW is going to improve the character creation system, because it's lacking in options: Why are eyebrows particular to a specific starting head? Ridiculous! And why the same concerning eye-shapes? It's nonsensical.
Why doesn't ME: A allow for modifying the default character faces? All the custom faces are hideous, while the default faces are the closest to looking like an actual person.
Also, I hope the BW is going to improve the character creation system, because it's lacking in options: Why are eyebrows particular to a specific starting head? Ridiculous! And why the same concerning eye-shapes? It's nonsensical.
I don't see the reference to Deus ex as valid, as Deus ex's voice acting was much better, and main characters were animated quite well. The NPC extras were on par at worse, the thing with ME:A is that MAIN FREAKING CHARACTERS are wooden and emotionless, topped off with bad voice direction and writing...
What about Austin? SWTOR is based out of there and is still active.
Checking.... Mass Effect: Andromeda is still $60 on Amazon.
Maybe I see the value of money differently, but... $60.... for game game? That has issues? From a problem publisher? Really?
There is a solution to that. It's called don't buy it. Wait six months. Let it drop in price. Don't be a beta tester.
I ended up picking the game up for ~$45.
It actually isn't that bad. The animations aren't great but I don't find they really take away from the experience (at least not as much as I had feared).
The game is... large, and feels like a streamlined version of DA:I
My biggest gripe is having to sit through extraordinarily long animations every time your ship takes off/lands/visits a new planet/visits a new system.
Who the fuck thought it would be a good idea to make those scenes unskippable?
I'm fairly certain those scenes are largely there to mask the game loading in the background.