The issue is not the energy we consume but how we produce it.
All the money we spend trying to make scientists fake the evidence to support a politically motivated regressive tax could be used to fund real energy research.
Fixed that for ya boss!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The issue is not the energy we consume but how we produce it.
All the money we spend trying to make scientists fake the evidence to support a politically motivated regressive tax could be used to fund real energy research.
That's because many US states are the SIZE of many countries.
this guy gets it. i have no idea what they teach in US schools... also, texas has 28 mn people which is only a third of germany so that image comparing size is just laughable. it's about population, not the size of the country. the U.S. does use way too much energy per capita.
this
unless people WANT to drink wash and bathe in the same water they shit and piss in...
Well its hot down here and I use A/C all the time, I cant live without A/C down here like some of you guys up there and Germany.
- No using energy saving and long lasting light bulbs.
- People watering in the middle of the day where the suns takes it biggest toll on watering effectiveness
- I have yet to meat one person that knows preheating, for the most part, is unneeded in cooking.
- People think they are recycling persons when they just recycle soda cans.
Texas/Population
26.96 million (2014)
Brazil/Population
200.4 million (2013)
So. Texas being the size of many other countries, with 1/10th the population, justifies it being a power hog?
We're a wasteful country and the longer people resist changing over to more energy efficient devices and renewable resources... the more it's going to hurt.
That said, it says something about their power consumption if they need to do shit like this to get power in the first place
I don't really want to get involved in the nationalistic dick measuring contest that's starting to break out in this thread, but you're delusional if you think Germany is some backwater. It's just a technologically advanced as the U.S. and probably has a healthier manufacturing sector all things considered.Are you REALLY going to damn the US because Google uses more power than A. Random Pig Farmer in northern Germany someplace?
I don't really want to get involved in the nationalistic dick measuring contest that's starting to break out in this thread
but you're delusional if you think Germany is some backwater. It's just a technologically advanced as the U.S. and probably has a healthier manufacturing sector all things considered.
who measures energy consumption in BTU?
Yeah I'm going to disagree with your reasoning there as to why it's looking like a 3rd world cesspool. It's more to do that inland areas used to be farmland, which traditionally uses people from where? Oh hey Mexico and central America as an extremely cheap labor force. Now if you're saying the whole rules about not being able to treat them like slaves being a reason, then yeah sure you may have a point on that, but is it really a bad thing? The inland areas have typically been the conservatives too, and now that they found they can cash out big time by selling their land and having it be turned into make shift suburbs of various cities, they're getting rich in a hurry and leaving.However, the high costs and regulations are turning the state into a 3rd world cesspool.
The inland areas are starting to look like the poor areas of Mexico and central America.
If you are in the middle class, its a struggle to afford a place to live, and if you can manage that, good luck affording to run the Air Conditioner.
who measures energy consumption in BTU?
Yeah, although the US isn't the largest energy users per capita, that distinction goes to Iceland
lol, nationalistic fervor. I live in Colorado. Your comparison didn't make much sense. I agree with your second sentence, but it was not clear at all from your post that I replied to.Now, had I replaced GOOGLE with "BMW", would THAT have soothed your nationalistic fervor?
My *POINT* was...that simply dividing a country's energy usage by populace results in a number that has exactly ZERO value. Because it doesn't take into account MANY other aspects of energy usage.
lol, nationalistic fervor. I live in Colorado. Your comparison didn't make much sense. I agree with your second sentence, but it was not clear at all from your post that I replied to.
Sigh, this useless drivel that is only intended to stir up low information activists.
California:
Population: 30,000,000
Living in Poverty: 5,000,000
Private nonfarm establishments: 874,243
Total number of firms: 3,425,510
Internet Users: 29,758,896
Mexico:
Population: 120,000,000
Living in Poverty: 54,000,000
Internet Users: 50,923,060
Registered businesses: 68,666
Can anyone figure out WHY mexico uses less power? Anyone? Shall we just remove all those businesses to make it more fair?
Telling people they can "save money" by replacing their cheap lightbulbs with $6-a-pop LED bulbs is a tough sell up-front.
In time, as incandescent production drops and mainstream fixtures turn exclusively to LED, it'll become more evident.
Except it's not always that easy out here in a short sighted nanny state like California.
Years ago they mandated florescent lights as the main lights in kitchens.
Some people didn't like the old florescent tube lights, or the slow startup of the compact florescent lights.
So, they would install can lights, install the compact florescent bulbs, wait until it passed inspection, and then swap out the bulbs.
So, to stop this, some cities started requiring special fixtures that would only take special florescent bulbs. So now these people can't simply switch to LED bulbs, they would have to rip out the old fixtures and install new ones.
Very dumb, and very California
But for your point to be accurate, you still have to prove that the energy difference between Germany and an equivalently-sized U.S. state is due to a disparity in high-energy industry/business, which you haven't done. My contention was that there are plenty of high-energy point sources in Germany (BMW to use your example). So why the difference? It could just be that German individuals and companies are both more energy efficient than their American counterparts. I don't know if that's the case without spending a few hours researching it, but it's a logical possibility.Of COURSE the comparison doesn't make sense!
Why is this even a legitimate discussion? You cannot have a standard of living and the way of life we have in the US without this level of energy production and consumption. Do people not fucking get that through their thick fucking SJW skulls? Fuck.
Texas/Population
26.96 million (2014)
Brazil/Population
200.4 million (2013)
So. Texas being the size of many other countries, with 1/10th the population, justifies it being a power hog?
We're a wasteful country and the longer people resist changing over to more energy efficient devices and renewable resources... the more it's going to hurt.
Wow. Stereotype much?
Sorry, but this is either blatantly idiotic or just pure trolling.
I DO agree that the standard of living of a country has a direct relationship with the level of energy consumption, but stating that it would not be possible to have the same standard of living whilst reducing said energy consumption is... well, I'm hoping you've realised yourself how silly that statement is.
Germany has a higher standard of living than the US, according to most sources, and yet their energy consumption adjusted for population is way, waaaay lower. I live in the country and I can tell you that having been often in the US it is very much a cultural and attitude difference.