InuYasha1337
n00b
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2010
- Messages
- 23
Hi, im new and im happy to know that there is a great forum like this.
So, i wanted to know if anybody has tried razer mamba after he was using deathadder.. what is better? i love my deathadder with my qpad ct (i'd very glad to find a pad whit the same tracking precision and with more friction.. my deathadder doesnt begin crazy when i pull up the mouse from the qpad ct.. but i would have more friction, precision..). i use 1800 dpi (i think.. what is the standard deathadder dpi setting?) with 3 in win windows and 2.2 in counter strike source.. with razer mamba could i always keep this configuration or the laser sensor begins crazy and does what it wants? Because im very interesting in buying razer mamba.. but im not sure. And another thing.. Razer deathadder 3500dpi is good as old 1800 version (the mine..) or it could have tracking problem with low sense as i said for the mamba?
Thx to all!
So, i wanted to know if anybody has tried razer mamba after he was using deathadder.. what is better? i love my deathadder with my qpad ct (i'd very glad to find a pad whit the same tracking precision and with more friction.. my deathadder doesnt begin crazy when i pull up the mouse from the qpad ct.. but i would have more friction, precision..). i use 1800 dpi (i think.. what is the standard deathadder dpi setting?) with 3 in win windows and 2.2 in counter strike source.. with razer mamba could i always keep this configuration or the laser sensor begins crazy and does what it wants? Because im very interesting in buying razer mamba.. but im not sure. And another thing.. Razer deathadder 3500dpi is good as old 1800 version (the mine..) or it could have tracking problem with low sense as i said for the mamba?
Thx to all!