Major hardware upgrade - advice needed

dav7

n00b
Joined
Jul 25, 2008
Messages
8
Note: I'm in Australia, so you'll need to be sure to keep that in mind when calculating location/pricing.

Hi. I'm looking to get a new computer to replace this rather dated P4 with 512MB RAM, and since I've never really gotten a new - as in brand-new - PC before, I'd like a bit of help to sort out the finer details. First up, this PC won't be a gaming PC. Consider it the PC of Macs: this box will generally be used in a creative media setting. So I need something that can pack a punch: I don't want to have to wait 2 weeks for stuff to render, I do actually want a machine that is, uh, *usable*. I also want a PC with a BIOS, so I can try out various operating systems, and I want something that is actually upgradeable in the sense I can upgrade the mobo or what not, so for these reasons I'm not just going to fork out some $ for a Mac and be done with it.

Now, graphics/creative work aside, I will want to do some low-level gaming with this box, although my gaming expectations are not high. Put it this way: due to life circumstances (that actually aren't money-based), I've had high disinterest in 3D gaming in the past however recently have had some interest in the field, so am interested in pursuing it. So, since my interaction with 3D games in the past hasn't been great beyond the occasional visit to a store with a demo game console, I haven't had [the interest to have] much exposure to high game quality so what I'm trying to say is that since I have had no experience/exposure, I don't need astounding game quality, so notwithstanding the fact that the cards will need good quality with handling animation work in Maya or Blender, game performance doesn't need to absolutely rock. Although I may need to get the latest and the best; I'm not sure.

So you know what the bank's limit actually is, the general limit of the budget is about (or if you absolutely must, slightly over) $5k, and while that might seem quite high/decent... two things. Firstly, I live in Australia, which loves to overprice things so we can consider $500 already gone just on inflation (or whatever it is that makes computer hardware so expensive here), and secondly, I want to upgrade 3 things at once here - I need a new system unit, want to "make the switch" from CRT to LCD, and I badly need some more diskspace - say 1TB or 2TB. I have absolutely no disk space left on any of my disks, so in terms of an upgrade I couldn't keep those and upgrade everything else.

A friend of mine has been helping me with my configuration, but I'd still like to run the possibilities by you all, considering that two [knowledgable] heads are better than one... having said that, this guy knows a heap - from when RAM moved from parity to ECC (in '98-'99) to knowing a motherboard's power system by looking at it to knowing about the next Intel CPUs that'll be coming out (the Nehalem chips) to what type of display I should get (an 8bpp one vs. a 6bpp one) - his bag is hardware, but sadly he's only had minimal real-world experience and isn't currently in a position to gain any experience as yet... therefore, you lot, who have been able to test out the latest and greatest configurations, are in a better position to really give me a good indicator as to what a good system would be.

I'm the exact opposite of my friend: his aptitude is hardware, mine is software. We fail in each other's respective departments. I talk software much better than hardware so I'll itemize what sort of software I want to run, list hardware I think I need (mostly thanks to my friend), and let you tell me what I've got right, what I need to fix, etc to run the software I want optimally.

Wrapping up, without knowledge that only comes from experience I could easily be cut a deal that leaves me stranded 6 months from now with faulty hardware that just got out of warranty. This PC is the first leg of a life course that will take me through the graphics arena and into the realtime animation field so I can pursue my life's dream, so I'm asking for integrity here - this is the computer I'll most likely see and use for most of the next 7 or more years (considering upgrades and such), so I need a workhorse. When recommending things, please do only recommend things that you know won't randomly die - especially in the graphics department - but not something that'll break the bank.

So you know, this same post is popping up on various other forums, and while juggling the responses will be interesting to say the least, more responses in a potentially life-changing situation as this (yes, this really is a life-changing situation, it'll be the start of a new chapter in my life) is definitely better.

Therefore, without further ado, let me begin. Note: I need equal Linux and Windows support for everything here. So, if something I list doesn't have the best Linux support, please do tell me so I can correct it (unless I've noted here that I already know, in which case... you may have a bit of a convincing job on your hands :p).


General requirements
  • I'm a visual thinker, so a lot of visual real estate and good display quality is definately a big plus, so I've had my eye on a 22"-30"-22" configuration (I was thinking perhaps the HP LP3065 for the center 30"er, since it's an 8bpp display). Back in my Windows days I was able to get an old ATi card to run 2 heads and (impressively) get my onboard video to run a 3rd head, producing a tri-screen configuration I never, ever forgot. Ever since, I've been waiting for the day I would get my 3 display configuration again. That last 3-display setup produced a maximum width of ~3000+ pixels, but it did seem a little cramped. A 30" display plus two 22"ers sure would be pricey, but would produce a 5000+ pixel workstation which would definately be a huge productivity boost over my current 1280x1024 configuration (I tried to convince my integrated Intel *shudder* 82845G to go to 1400x1050, but in doing so I got to learn what "moderately severe hardware instability" meant).
  • I want to be able to watch full HD (think HDTV and Blu-Ray disc) media on my PC. So I need a BD-ROM and TV tuner card. And a surround sound speaker system.
  • I need to be able to use desktop effects such as Compiz Fusion, enabling next to everything, and still be able to have full motion video running as well, with the effects on, and get little or no "okay and now you can see that it's starting to tax the CPU and GPU".
  • The ability to drag any window to any display in Linux is pretty much a requirement, so I'll need one copy of X running all the displays, and therefore since 3 displays are going to require >1 video card, the cards I get will likely need to be of the same type. Also, I want Compiz Fusion's cube to span all 3 of my displays as one gigantic "wow" if that's at all possible =P
  • I require a stable system! A $5k computer that will break in 6 months is not something I will be able to justify adding to the menu.
  • Initial hardware no-brainer must-haves (for me anyway)
    • My case: the Lian Li PC-V2110B. Yes, expensive ($528 ftw), but it's both a full-height case, will fit under my desk (which has around 660mm of height available), and looks clean while still retaining character. It's the only case that looks minimalistic enough to be something I'd call my own, yet it isn't horribly boring. It also has 4 USB ports, Firewire, eSATA and audio connectors under a little pop-up flap *at the top of the case*, can handle more hard disks than I own (and I have quite a few...), and is mostly unbranded (except for a logo on said flip-up flap). WIN. All. The. Way!!!
    • IDE support on the mobo, so I can run OSes that don't have SATA support. One channel is enough.
    • FDD support. All my PCs and laptops have had FDD support, and I want to continue this lineage. I'll also probably use it at least once XD
    • An onboard buzzer or speaker!
    • The Logitech MX Air mouse, which can adopt a Wii-like pointing system.
    • The G15 gaming keyboard, for its LCD and programmable keys. The LCD "protocol" was reverse engineered and the extended keys figured out, and an unofficial driver was developed for Linux to support these.


Software in general
  • One of my interests is operating systems, both when virtualized and on real hardware. I will be running multiple virtualized OSes at once, likely in VirtualBox or QEMU.
  • The GIMP, possibly editing rather large images
  • Inkscape, possibly editing rather large images
  • Firefox, with a prodigious (200+) amount of tabs open for an indefinite period of time; more likely than not with multiple windows open as well (with their own huge amount of tabs open). Put it this way: I only close tabs so my browser is usable, not because I want to, so given half the chance I'll just keep opening new tabs.


Software - Linux specific
  • Compiz Fusion with basically everything enabled
  • Beagle (or comparable/better equivalents)
  • A full GNOME or KDE desktop (taking into account that I'd be using Emerald, not Metacity or KWin)
  • Blender with very complex scenes such as true-to-live video (can you do that sort of thing? I'd assume you can)
  • The Banshee audio player (which requires Mono and stuff, to give you an idea of its dependancies)


Software - Windows specific (whichever of Vista or XP are required)
  • Still- and moving-image rendering systems such as Maya/RenderMan, Adobe Photoshop, Adobe After Effects, etc.


Gaming
  • I've never really played 3D games before, since I only have 64MB of Intel video (that 82845G I mentioned briefly before), which I was never able to "get going" under my distro, Arch Linux (glxinfo has always reported no direct rendering, and I've never really bothered to try to make it say yes), but I want to get into the latest 3D games and be able to play them without jittering, but like I said before, medium or medium-low quality to everyone else is okay quality to me (notwithstanding hardware requirements).


Stuff I'm not sure about
  • Should I, say, get 1 or 2 1TB SATA2 disks for data storage, a 16GB or 32GB SSD for my main OS (Arch Linux), a smaller SATA2 disk (eg 250GB) for misc. OS data (not my main OS), and finally an IDE disk I already have for OSes that don't "do" SATA? The SSD sounds like a smart concept, but since /home and the package cache (what would likely benefit the most from the use of the SSD anyway) would be stored on one of the 1TB SATA HDDs (for reliability) I don't really see the benefit in using an SSD. What should I do? With an SSD, am I looking at both increased application speed/performance/responsiveness, lowered bootup / application startup time, or both?
  • The CPU vendor/model. Should I go Intel or AMD? I was told by a computer store that AMD + Linux is worse than Intel + Linux. Is this true, or simply a ploy to make me buy the more expensive Intel processor? Regardless of vendor, I think I should go quad-core, so that said, what MHz should I try and reach for (remember, my bank is easily breakable =P)?
  • The graphics card vendor/model. Like the CPU, I don't know if I should go ATi. I've had a very, very bad experience with an ATi card recently; ultimately, I was left in textmode, albeit at my own error (I managed to get the idea that blacklisting intel_agp from the module list modprobed on boot would be a good idea - I mean, why not disable all unused modules? :p) but it was the fault of the ATi card. It really was (RV505 isn't supported; had to recompile X and everything; X didn't work properly due to ld.so preload issues; tried to overwrite X build with distro packages; thought I broke something; etc)! However, the point is that card or no card, I have a bad taste in my mouth associated with ATi, but am willing to give them a go provided I can be guaranteed a no-hassle setup/installation (within the as-is limitations that Linux constrains everything/everyone to, of course). I do know that ATi's RV770 chipset line look promising... very promising...
  • The mobo. This is the big blank. I just don't know what's good/optimal and what isn't. I know I need IDE support, but I only need a single channel as two IDE HDDs will be fine: one for OS data, and one for user data that will (probably) ultimately end up on my SATA[2] user data drive. Or one with a few partitions on it for each (which will most likely be what happens, considering I have a 250GB IDE disk I can migrate to my 1TB disk when I get the latter). Once again considering the GPU, I think I should get a board with CrossFire support.
  • If I were to go nVIDIA, Would getting a 9800GX2 - which only has two video outputs - along with eg an 8600GT be a worse idea than getting, say, two 8800GT cards and SLIing those together to get 4 video outputs along with dual link for the 30" LCD?
  • Ever since I recieved an old "multimedia PC" from the early-mid 90s which had an (ISA) SB16 in it, I immediately liked my SB16, the SoundBlaster line, and Creative... because myself and the SB16 share a common interest: bass boost. So, fast forward to today, where I've listened to my P4's onboard, bassboost-less audio for the first time in... uhh... months, and have discovered that my poor SB16 is really, uh, garbage quality. So, in my quest for good quality audio with bass boost, I've settled on the Creative X-Fi Xtreme Audio, which has an audio breakout box (which is automatically a new shiny gadget to add to the desk and look awesome with :D), however I've heard that this card has terrible Linux support... because it doesn't work with ALSA. I have, however, heard that it works fine with OSS, so what's the problem there? OSS is reported to have good Creative X-Fi support. I don't really care (but in a nice way) what audio framework I use, provided it works, gives me okay quality, and doesn't hit me with "*BAM*. Sorry, cannot run this." in areas that'll really prevent me from exploring possibilities that may be critical to my life work. What should I do here?


Finer-grained rough hardware ideas
  • A quad-core CPU, to handle all the stuff I want to be able to do.
  • Like the X-Fi, the Logitech Z-5500 includes an "audio accessory" I can add to the desk, which even includes a backlit LCD and everything... but really, is this audio controller worth it? It doesn't even have a headphone jack that I can see, so I wouldn't even be able to apply the audio effects the controller can produce through headphones - and I'll actually have headphones plugged in most of the time anyway, and unplug them to listen to music in a movie, or when I want to share a video or a piece of music with someone but don't want to be constrained to headphones.



Draft computer layout
This was provided thanks to my friend; he's recommended a dual-socket server board which I can stuff two quad-core Xeons into, supports 64GB RAM, has more network ports than I can shake a fist at, SATA, etc. It also has IDE and a buzzer. Items colored red indicate choices I disagree with.


That would make a mighty fine server system, and a temendously reliable workstation - which is definately a plus - but at $7000, it's $2k over my price limit.

Beyond the G15 keyboard, MX Air mouse and PC-V2110B case, I'm flexible - I just want something that works well, packs a gigantic punch, and doesn't fail. However, if you know of another keyboard with an LCD in it, another mouse which can operate like a Wiimote, or a case that looks like the PC-V2110B, please do tell me ;)

-dav7
 
Before I start I should say that I have no experience in the high end realm or with building a system such as the one you desire.

If you're a fan of Mac OS's, maybe you should look into OSx86 and try to choose hardware that is supported by Apple's OS X.

You seem to be set on the Lian Li case, but $390 is excessive and unjustifiable IMO.

You should avoid CrossFire and SLI if you want better stability and compatibility. A single 4870 or a GTX 260/280 might be better choices. I don't know if workstation cards such as nVidia Quadro or ATI FireGL are worth the extra money, but people seem to buy them. I think they're just regular cards with special BIOS and hardware locks to allow you to run special workstation drivers. I could be totally wrong though. Maybe workstation cards with workstation drivers work well in SLI or Crossfire.

I don't think $569 is worth it for a 147GB SAS drive. You'd probably be just as happy with a 300GB VelociRaptor for under $300.

1200W is excessive. CORSAIR CMPSU-1000HX 1000W for $269 should be perfect.

$1200 for a 21" monitor at 1680 x 1050 seems silly. That resolution cannot properly display 1080p Blu-ray content either. How about NEC Display Solutions LCD2490WUXi-BK for $1,099.99 + shipping
 
Goddamn. That's gotta be the longest post here in the forum. :D

Oh and you might want to put at the very top of your post: "I AM IN AUSTRALIA" in big bold caps and font. Unfortunately not everyone is willing/capable of reading such a long post. And unfortunately, not many people relaize that Australia is NOT the U.S. :(

Anyway, just so you know, once you go past $2000 or so, you get serious diminishing returns. A $6000 PC will outperform a $2000 PC but not by much. Maybe 5% or so.

CPU:
In terms of sheer performance, which is one of your criteria, Intel is simply the best choice. However, historically Linux support for new Intel chipsets have been a little bit lagging. But I haven't heard/read of any major incompatiblity problems with Intel chipsets at the moment. CPU wise, I recommend getting the Intel Q9450. It's the right balance of price, performance and power usage:
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 CPU - $330

GPU:
Definitely ATI now. The HD4850/HD4870/HD4870X2 cards are some of the best bang for your buck cards out there. In addition, Linux support for those cards is very mature and just as good as Windows support.
ATI Radeon HD 4850 Linux Performance
Radeon HD 4870 Linux Performance

Oh and SLI only supports one monitor. At least with Crossfire you have support for at least two monitors, if not more.

Mobo:
I recommend these motherboards:
DFI Lanparty DK X38-T2R Intel X38 Motherboard - $180
Asus P5E Deluxe Intel X48 Motherboard - $220
Gigabyte GA-X48-DS4 Intel X48 Motherboard - $225

Storage:
SSD hasn't shown a large enough performance increase to warrant the extra costs IMO. Mechanical hard drives are still the best in performance. Judging from your requirements and your budget, you're a prime candidate for this drive:
Western Digital VelociRaptor WD3000GLFS 300GB 10000 RPM SATA 3.0Gb/s Hard Drive - $300

Fastest consumer-grade mechanical drive you can get now. Do you want any redundancy in your storage, i.e. RAID5?

Though I'm curious, what OSese are you using that don't support SATA?

I'll go a bit more in-depth later.
 
Oh one more question:
Does that $5000 budget include the 30" monitor plus two 22" monitors that you want?
 
dhc014: OS X legally requires you own a Mac. I do own - in the sense that finders keepers - a Powermac 5500, but I picked that up from what was effectively a "junk area", so I think that's pushing the rule a little bit. I do very much like the idea of OSx86 however!

Okay, well, maybe $390 is a bit much, but I like that case. And being made of aluminium, it looks like it'll just sit there and... not disintegrate. For a while, anyway.

And about CrossFire and SLI... I'm still figuring these out, so can't really comment on these technologies or the Quadro or FireGL technologies, except to say that the Quadro Plex is between $20k and $40k, and it's what animation companies use, so maybe there's something there. I'm not sure. What's the diff between, say, a 9800GX2 and the GTX280?

Ok, right. I thought 147GB was kinda on the lean side too. 300GB is more like it, although I'm not exactly sure why I'd want SAS anyway.

Likewise, I thought 1200W was a bit much... do I even need 1kW? I want to leave this PC on overnight...

And that 21" display is $1.2k because it's 8-bit, not 6-bit. It can actually, physically, display 1,677,216 colors, and doesn't dither them to a 262,144 color panel.

Danny Bui: Maybe this is the longest post, haha :p

Done.

Wow, interesting. I'll keep that in mind, although I'm sure you mean just for the system unit?

Okay, a C2Q is on the theoretical menu. What about this update I'm hearing stuff about, where Intel's going to replace the CPU socket and actually knock out the northbridge or southbridge...?! :eek:

ATi! Well, okey dokey then... I've heard "4870X2" - should I be interested in this, which is basically a dual-link card? A 30" LCD is going to need a dual link capable card... or did I miss the boat by an ocean or two?

SLI = one display. Wow, wasn't expecting that. CrossFire++!

The latter two have actually been on some menus in the past for me, so that's interesting... I'll give these some more thought then.

SSD = out then.

I don't know anything at all about RAID, and have never bothered to learn about it. If I were to get a server-grade HDD tho, which is rated for 1.8 million hours (200 years), I shouldn't need to worry about data, should I?

Syllable, Haiku, BeOS, QNX, VMS, and plan9. Probably more - I'm kind of a history junkie that way :p

Yes, the $5k budget needs to account for my LCD upgrade, TBs of new disk space and the new computer itself. So this is pushing it a little...

-dav7
 
Yes I mean $2000 for just the main PC itself, without the monitor or large storage options included.

A PSU will only draw the amount of power that the PC needs. So if the PC only needs 400W, then that's all that the PSU will draw/provide.

Nehalem is Intel's new CPU architecture. It will have an integrated Memory Controller Hub, similar to AMD CPUs and will use two new sockets. One socket is aimed at the performance market and the other is geared towards the mainstream market. Though the mainstream isn't due till Q2 2009 IIRC. Because of the integrated memory controller, the northbridge is effectively removed or at the very least reduced. From current previews, Nehalem CPUs are at least 20% faster than current Intel C2Ds.

You missed the boat by an ocean. The 4870X2 is essentaially two GPUs (video card CPUS) on one PCB or video card that uses an onboard Crossfire connector. So far, a single HD4870X2 has been shown to have impressive performance and is just perfect for gaming on a 24" monitor and larger. If you can get the HD4870X2 when it's released in mid August, no need to use a Crossfire setup.

Oh and most mid to high end cards have dual-link DVI which you need for the 30" monitor.

Even server grade drives can die. Sure they have an extremely lower chance of death but they still can die. But meh, don't worry about it. Just thought you'd want a little redudancy.

Anyway, here's a preliminary build:
Main PC:
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 CPU - $330
2 x Corsair TWIN2X4096-6400C5 2 x 2GB DDR2 800 RAM - $174 ($87 each)
Gigabyte GA-X48-DS4 Intel X48 Motherboard - $225
2 x VisionTek 900244 Radeon HD 4870 512MB PCI-E Video Card - $570($285 each)
Western Digital VelociRaptor WD3000GLFS 300GB 10000 RPM SATA 3.0Gb/s Hard Drive - $300
Corsair 1000HX Modular PSU - $230
Xigmatek HDT-S1283 120mm Rifle HSF - $37 & Retention Bracket - $7
---
Total: $1873 Plus tax and shipping

BTW, do you know of any good Australia online stores similar to newegg that we could use for price and parts availablity reference? It would help us help you a bit better since I'm pretty sure you guys don't get the same parts or the same prices. IN other words, where are you going to be ordering the parts from?
 
Right. $2k is kinda pushing it me thinks, but let's give it a go anyway. :p

Well, so then in the PSU arena I need to find a unit that will give me what I think I will need in future then, so if I add a new power-eater, I can actually run it..?

Wow, fun. Will there be a quad-core equivalent of the Nehalem architecture, and if there is, would it outdo a Q9450? If so, when Nehalem comes out, what do you think my chances of selling the CPU/board I'd possibly get now (say on ebay or similar sites such as gumtree), and if so, how much for?

Ok, I was just wondering that since "dual link" = two cards, I might need to CrossFire two cards together. But since the 4870X2 is the same in terms of linkedness as a 9800GX2, I'm saved configuring that. Very good. And I can add another 6 to 12 months from now (if they still exist by then - maybe I should be saying "1 to 3 months"!).

See last paragraph...?

Well, I don't have much redundancy now, if you don't count the 2 or 3 "right, gots a new HDD/laptop/whatever... copy everything I'm working on over to it" *copies over 50% of HDD* I've done in the past :p

That looks pretty good. But then again, that's a *desktop*. Should I really consider desktop "quality" or server quality? :\

BTW, check out http://www.neoseeker.com/forums/17/t1201769-major-hardware-upgrade-advice-needed/#0 and http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/253956-31-major-hardware-upgrade-advice-needed#t1834460 - these are basically mirrors of this post, but I'm getting slightly different responses from there. And the first link references 3 online stores from AU that I might be able to choose from - and I'll include another, http://computeronline.com.au.

-dav7
 
The Corsair 1000W PSU is in fact more than enough for whatever you decide to add. In fact, for the build above, you only need a good 550W PSU. So you do have a ton of headroom for future upgrades.

Actually the first Nehalem CPUs will be nothing but quad-cores. And I have already said that the Nehalem CPUs are at least 20% faster than current Intel Core 2 Duo CPUs, which includes the Q9450. You could still probably sell the CPU, mobo and RAM (Nehalem only uses DDR3 RAM BTW) when Nehalem launches in September (according to current rumors). But do note that a Nehalem build will be expensive as hell. We're talking $1000 for just the mothebroard and CPU. You might be able to squeeze in DDR3 RAM if you're extremely lucky. Still pretty damn expensive for Americans. So I'd imagine it would be even more expensive for you in Australia.

I should clarify: RAID is not backup. It's just a way to keep your data up, running and available if a drive dies. It's not a replacement for backups. If you want to know about RAID, here's a good article on it:
http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/2007/06/11/understanding_raid/1

For you, desktop quality is just fine. In addition, desktop quality is almost as a good as server quality. For 95% of users out there, desktop quality is just fine. In addition, your budget really doesn't allow for server grade or workstation class parts. At least server grade or workstation parts that are worth a damn.

Some of those recommendations are sound (like avoiding the dual CPU and other server parts) while some are just plain dumb (The Q9550, 16GB RAM, and EP45-EXTREME recommendation)

Have you found which 30" monitor and 22" monitors you're gonna get?
 
Okay, awesome. The PSU, notwithstanding asplosions, should be good for the longest then.

...Ouch... meepmeep. Maybe I can wait a few months for the platform to settle down :D

Yeah, RAID is for redundancy; I know that much. Still, I'm not a "backup guy", and probably won't be for a while, although with [external] eSATA [ports] I can just grab 500GB (and in the future, 1TB) eSATA disks every 6 months for pittance and do regular, incremental backups onto those. So that no-backup thing may change - especially as I'm probably going to be getting some data I sure won't want to lose in the future!

Okay, that said, server grade hardware is guaranteed not to fail. And isn't 8 cores a good idea?... CPU power and all... sure, so I won't be running massively SMP applications, but I'll be able to run more than one type of demanding app at once - eg, one or two VirtualBox instances can have 3 CPU cores, Blender can have one (or two, if it supports two), and I've got two or three cores left for handing out to Firefox, the kernel, etc. The result: a heavily loaded but amazingly responsive system - exactly what I'm looking for.

I know which 30" display I'm getting - it was in my original post:
I'm a visual thinker, so a lot of visual real estate and good display quality is definately a big plus, so I've had my eye on a 22"-30"-22" configuration (I was thinking perhaps the HP LP3065 for the center 30"er, since it's an 8bpp display).

I'll note that 8bpp displays can actually display 1677216 (16.7M) colors, and don't dither to a 262144 (256k) color panel.

I'll admit I'm terrible at laying out info in a way that is "easily scannable" though - it's either "read it all or ask questions" with me (at least at the moment anyway) :p

-dav7
 
Server grade hardware is not guaranteed not to fail. Server grade hardware is guaranteed to have an extreme low rate of failure. True, 8 cores is a good idea for you. I see that in the other threads Skulltrail was mentioned a lot. Totally forgot about Skulltrail. But lets see if your budget allows for it:

If you go with that HP monitor, that cuts out close to $2000 AUD out of your budget:
HP LP3065 30" Monitor - $1949 AUD

So that leaves $3000 AUD for the main system, storage and two 22" monitors. Take off an additional $550 AUD for the two 22" monitors (which seems to be the going price for a decent 22" monitor in Australia) and you're now down to roughly $2500 AUD for the rig and storage.

From the other threads, it seems like you want the Seagate 7200.11 1TB drive. Good choice BTW. Using one myself and I like it. For you two of those Seagate 1TB drives will run about $400 AUD:
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 ST31000340AS 1TB 7200 RPM SATA 3.0Gb/s Hard Drive - $200 AUD

So that leaves about $2100 AUD for the rig itself. And that is not enough for a dual-CPU solution like Skulltrail judging from the prices you have to pay. It looks like you are charged about 15% more on hardware than Americans.

BTW I'm only using Mwave as a point of reference since I know of it's US counterpart and it does have better prices than any Aussie site listed so far.
 
Just for reference, here's a rig that I built using Aussie sites:
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 CPU - $378 AUD
Asus P5E Intel X38 Motherboard - $236 AUD
2 x Kingston KVR800D2N5K2/4G 2 x 2GB DDR2 800 RAM - $198 AUD ($99 AUD each)
2 x GeCube Radeon HD 4870 512MB PCI-E Video Card - $616 AUD ($308 AUD each)
Western Digital VelociRaptor WD3000GLFS 300GB 10000 RPM SATA 3.0Gb/s Hard Drive - $350 AUD
Corsair 750TX PSU - $180 AUD
Xigmatek HDT-S1283 120mm Rifle HSF - $50 AUD
---
Total: $2008 AUD Plus tax and shipping
 
Alright, so with server stuff, all I'm getting is a longer operational life, guarantee, and higher price, then?

I'm learning a lot quickly (for me at least), and therefore have a few things evened out. I am definitely getting that LP3065, two 22" or 24" 'side-displays', a 7200.11 SATA2 HDD or two, a G15 keyboard, MX Air mouse, and possibly the X-Fi and Z-5500 for the audio side of things. And I definately want 8 or more GB of RAM, and 4 or 8 cores.

I'd do 3 30" LCDs, but that would eat up a lot of $, and I'd have to start worrying about insurance :eek:

That leaves the system type and graphics cards up for debate.

Let's... let's let up on the budget's upper limit a bit. If I were to ask you to heighten the budget to fit a system that really would perform well for my needs, and even include a bit of future-proofness - but only by as little as possible - what would you recommend?

Additionally, what should I aim for in terms of CPU?

This cross-forum post in a similar thread references AMD hardware:
bball4ever39 said:
If I built a brand new computer right now.. It would be a nice quad socket AMD opteron setup. Get 16+ GB of ram in there, and as many HD 4870 x2's as would fit on the board.

That sounds like a good gaming/rendering solution, but for my usage requirements - overall, including running various OSes and trying out the latest different types of software and stuff - would it be a smart move? I mean in terms of an AMD CPU/board versus an Intel-based one. Stuffing whatever board I get full of 4870X2s sounds good though (excluding, of course, the slot where I want to shove an X-Fi).

Hm, we have software virtualization, and can run Windows and Linux at once... maybe someone should make a board with magic in it that can seat an AMD and an Intel CPU at once... sure, it'd be $5-$7k, but I'm sure it'd be a novel idea... I'd probably buy it 10 years after release, when it was a commodity, and it was $600 :p

-dav7
 
Yup, thats what you get with server-grade hardware. But like I'm telling you, consumer grade hardware is pretty good already.

Even if you upped your budget a little, you're already at the point of diminishing returns for consumer grade hardware. The setup I recommended above is more than enough for your needs. If your budget was a bit bigger, I'll probably recommend the same build above but with a larger PSU (Corsair 1000HX). The motherboard I recommended already does include a bit of future-proofness with the its PCI-E 2.0 slots as well as all the expansion ports you need. No matter what CPU, RAM, and motherboard I recommend, none of it will be compatible with Intel's new Nehalem hardware coming out soon.

Oh and FYI, Skulltrail doesn't have enough of a future-proofness since all of its PCI-E x16 slots are PCI-E 1.1, not PCI-E 2.0 like the Asus motherboard recommended above. PCI-E 2.0 might be useful in the future.

CPU wise, go for an Intel quad-core CPU. Just about any Intel quad-core CPU will fit your needs quite nicely. AMD's quad-core CPUs are slower than their Intel counterparts nor do they overclock well.

Don't bother with the quad-socket Operton setup. Most of those motherboards only have one PCI-Ex16 slots and don't have support for quad-core Opteron CPUs IIRC. Not a good idea performance-wise as stated above.

EDIT:
Oh and to clear up some info in your crosspost
- Crossfire does support up to 4 GPUs, just like SLI. Note that I said GPUs. So two HD4870X2 (two GPUs on one card) or 4 x HD4870 (1 GPU on one card) in Crossfire is the max limit for Crossfire.
- I said that all of the first Nehalem CPUs to be released will be quad-cores. I did not say that the Nehalem architecture will be completely all quad-cores. There are dual-core Nehalem CPUs being released in Q2 2009. There will also be a server only Nehalem octa-core CPU being released in Q2 2009.
 
Danny Bui: Okay, I have an idea. This is the best I can think of.

Since the Nehalem is a brand-new chipset, it's Version One Point Oh. 1.0 is always bug-ridden to some extent and always has issues. Yes, NDA'd developers have been beta-testing boards and Nehalem chips, but nothing beats a release to market in finding a stack of bugs. I will not be surprised when reports pop up everywhere about bugs in the chipset. As if having a dislike for software instability wouldn't be enough, having a PC that could crash because it's "v1.0" would just be too much. In pseudo-math, "v1.0 + huge pricetag < 20% performance increase". I'll get one of these later on, thank you.

So a board needs to be figured out that will handle the Q9550, predicting the Q9550's price drop in a few weeks. This should be easy as pie - for you guys anyway.

And what about this: I get a 4870X2, and a FireGL card. Best of both worlds - a CrossFire'd 4870 for gaming, and a card Maya will see and render via. And... 4 outputs!

Out of interest, do server or desktop boards exist that have PCI-E 2.0, CrossFire (do I need to worry if the board has CrossFire if I get a 4870X2?), and one with... dual CPU sockets that will take a Q9550? I understand that the Mac Pro uses dual Q5500s, but that's on a rebranded, modified server board, and the unmodified version probably doesn't have PCI-E 2.0, CrossFire (if required), etc...?

Now, with the 4870X2/FireGL idea - and I can see no reason why that wouldn't work - we have a problem. The FireGL line is geared toward high performance scheduled rendering, not updating 92365985283645872389742658724365982734 pixels in a single second :p so, I don't really want to connect my 30" display to it, I want my 30" LCD on the fastest card I have in terms of realtime performance, and a smaller display on the FireGL. Is this a good idea? Should one of the 22" or 24" displays I use have an 8bpp panel for optimal performance with the FireGL... or should I just settle with juggling connections between my 30" and the FireGL/4870X2 depending on whether I want to check the detail of something or play games...? I really am at a loss here. Unless something could be worked out or a fun card switching solution was found, I can imagine that the cable going to the 22" and 30" panels I'd continually be swapping would likely end up needing regular replacement, and that's not saying anything for the poor video card sockets.

I understand if nobody has any idea about this, but when a graphics card is rendering a scene, does it switch its video pipes (ie, the video ports) off? It'd make no sense if it does, but if it does, this may introduce issues, since I would lose one of my displays when rendering stuff, causing me to lose interest in rendering things. Not that I would be doing much else anyway, but I hate displays frequently turning on and off - it's just one of those "oddnesses" of mine... censoring what I don't want to see on TV is a nightmare, because the TV has to be continually turned on and off. I try not to watch shows that I have to censor... but I have no choice but to juggle the power button whenever the after-midnight ads come on ;)

tiraides: Well, you asked for it... :p

In a nutshell, I have aspergers / high-functioning autism (they're the same, although the medical industry wouldn't want you to believe that).

For those of you who don't know, Aspergers basically means the brain develops incorrectly wired, causing some areas to overdevelop while leaving other areas still in the rudimentary stages of growth.

I'm one of those people you'd call "late diagnosed" - the fact that my brain didn't exactly form properly wasn't figured out until '06, when I got a copy of the May article of Time magazine which had an article in it on Autism and discovered that I had a lot of the symptoms listed there. Now my nutritionally switched on mother has me on Chlorella and Zeolite - the latter of which is actually illegal to promote publicly in Australia - not surprisingly, considering the effect it's had on me. I won't go any further however, and if a moderator wants to edit this in any way, I understand.

Untreated, Aspergers can result in sufferers ranging from the idiot savant who can't talk properly but can predict 30 chess moves in advance to those who can sell ice to an Eskimo using just speech but sit down at a broken computer and stare at the display mindlessly.

Personally, I'm absolutely terrible at face-to-face communication; the real-time factor has often left me for dead in too many situations for me to be able to count, and a plethora of things in my brain that are just not working correctly don't make this any easier for me - for example, my "verbal" input area isn't connected to my verbal output area, and therefore things I might take in such as role models, ways of speaking, and so on, never make it to the verbal output part of my brain's resource section, and therefore I never appear as if I learn anything useful about verbal speaking and interaction... sometimes I might realize something is actually wrong, alot of the time I don't. I've just started to get humongously rudimentary comprehension of rudeness, arrogance, and the like - that part of my brain has just switched on, and is comparatively probably 1 or 2 years old, I'd expect. Up until now - and it can still actually happen - my mum will often take offense at something I didn't even realize I said, or the way I said something (my tone of voice is also not something I know how to correctly "set" for optimal results in a communicatory setting)... it can be hard, and it's not my mum's fault.

Even with textual communication, that's also hard for me to get just right unless I'm in the safety of the computer room, behind a computer screen where I'm not going to be disturbed and I can close the browser or other method of communication if things get too much... and even then, it can be hard for me to get my point across at times. However, I find computing, ideas, animated visual media and similar concepts (provided they're animated, I'm absolutely terrible with still media) second-nature to my thinking (I hope to be a pilot some day) so, to sum up, this computer is where I'm going to be starting in the areas I think I can handle/manage. Since computing is the only field I have a lot of practical, real-world experience with, it is, for the moment, the best I can afford to have an interest in.

So I need a real powerhouse - something that doesn't restrict me in any way - and works with me, not the other way around where I have to work within the limitations of the hardware I have. I hope to get through courses of some kind or other - possibly creative arts, I'm not sure - but the chances are they will require I have a computer capable of running Windows Vista and MS Office, and this PC will definitely not be able to foot that bill. Once through university I will probably have a lot more opportunities available to me, but for now, my possibilities are very limited, and the Australian Government has no plan to help people like me, in my age group - it's only targeted for people between 6 and 12, and I'm 5 years over the upper limit, sadly.

Back to hardware, I also need a computer that is a graphics rendering workstation so I can explore realtime and scheduled rendering, and lastly a PC that can handle gaming, so I can explore that field and make intelligent decisions regarding what future games could be like - you could consider me a futurist, except all the awesome ideas I get get tossed onto the gigantic pile that is the future hardware/software platform I hope to build :)

Next up, I also need a LOT of diskspace, since I have duplicates of my triplicates, but not in a good way - my disks have backups of backups because I've never been able to get a disk big enough disk to handle all of my data so I can sort it all out, and likewise not enough screen space to open 20 windows at once - which I need: I tried using Midnight Commander when X had broken, and actually managed to get my huge home folder into respective directories, but in terms of actual file management I failed terribly - nothing is where I'd put it. As a visual thinker I need to be able to open as many windows as is required to sort everything out, because such an activity is very visual, and graphical. To be honest with you, MC would be fine if one could add/remove nested vertical and/or horizontal panes...

-dav7
 
Back
Top