Lost Planet 2 Benchmark Released

I

IRSmurf

2[H]4U
Joined
Apr 1, 2007
Messages
2,312
Presenting the latest metric for gaming performance: Lost Planet 2 Benchmark

I bet Kyle's going to have a [H]-on for this benchmark. It uses "real world gameplay," meaning instead of being on a track it is played by AI. This bench kicked my computer's ass.


(Yes, this screenshot was grabbed during my benchmark using FRAPS.)

Get the 1GB download here: http://nzone.com/object/nzone_lostplanet2_downloads.html

If you choose to post your results please include a screenshot of the results (behind a text link), your resolution, AA Level, DX11 Level, CPU info, GPU info (including driver version) and RAM info.

Run the bench with whatever settings best suit your system and share! This isn't an e-peen competition, this is to compare hardware performance and ensure our systems are pumping out all the performance they should.

For reasonably high end rigs, to best compare with other posters, please use these settings:
Display Mode: Full Screen
VSync: Off
Motion Blur: On
Shadow Detail: High
Texture Detail: High
Rendering Level: High
DX11 Level: High or Medium (If running in DX11)
If any of these settings are changed, please make sure to log them in your post!

PS: Native resolution, 0xAA and DX11: Medium make a great base line!

Blacklash said:
http://www.nvidia.com/object/nvidia-multigpu-SLI-profile-update-v5-driver.html
Click to expand...
If you're running SLI, you must download the 8/16/2010 SLI profile update!
 
Last edited:
CPU: i7 920 @ 4GHz
RAM: 3G DDR3 @ 1600MHz (8-8-8-24)
GPU: SLI GTX 480 stock clocked, GeForce GPU driver v258.96, NVIDIA 3D Vision driver v258.96
(These benchmarks were performed before downloading the SLI profile update... so all of these results, even the Surround results, were generated with one GTX 480's processing power)

2D
Bench Settings: 2D, 1680x1050, 4xMSAA, DX11: High
Test A: Results (57.7 fps)

Bench Settings: 2D, 1680x1050, 0xAA, DX11: Medium
Test A: Results (69.2 fps)

Bench Settings: 2D Surround, 5040x1050, 0xAA, DX11: Medium
Test A: Results (33.1 fps)

3D
Bench Settings: 3D, 1680x1050, 4xMSAA, DX11: High
Test A: Results (23.5 fps)

Bench Settings: 3D, 1680x1050, 0xAA, DX11: Medium
Test A: Results (32.0 fps)

Bench Settings: 3D Surround, 5040x1050, 0xAA, DX11: Medium
Test A: Results (14.6 fps)
 
Last edited:
CPU: i7 930 @ Stock
RAM: 6GB DDR3 1600
GPU: ATi Radeon HD 5870 1GB

Bench Settings:1680x1050, 4xMSAA, DX11: High

Test A: Results (31.2 fps)
 
Last edited:
once I get my stuff in the mail I'll be testing this for sure.

hd5850
amd phenom x4
4gb 1600 ddr3 ram
1920x1080
 
Test 1: 49 FPS at 1920x1080 all on high, 32AA
Test 2: 39 FPS at 1920x1080 all on high, 32AA

Test ran on my GTX 480 with my i7 950 at stock speeds, on DX11
 
IRSmurf said:
CPU: i7 920 @ 4GHz
RAM: 3G DDR3 @ 1600MHz (8-8-8-24)
GPU: SLI GTX 480 stock clocked, GeForce GPU driver v258.96, NVIDIA 3D Vision driver v258.96

Bench Settings: 2D, 1680x1050, 4xMSAA, DX11: High
Test A: Results (57.7 fps)

Bench Settings: 2D, 1680x1050, 0xAA, DX11: Medium
Test A: Results (69.2 fps)

Bench Settings: 2D Surround, 5040x1050, 0xAA, DX11: Medium
Test A: Results (33.1 fps)

Bench Settings: 3D, 1680x1050, 4xMSAA, DX11: High
Test A: Results (23.5 fps)

Bench Settings: 3D, 1680x1050, 0xAA, DX11: Medium
Test A: Results (32.0 fps)

Bench Settings: 3D Surround, 5040x1050, 0xAA, DX11: Medium
Test A: Results (14.6 fps)
Click to expand...

the game supports the SLI ???????????
terrible, 2way 480 14.6 FPS
 
rig in sig DX9.0c (obviously)
Resolution 1680*1050
Default settings of
Vsync off
motion blur on
shadow detail high
texture detail high

Test A
rank B 55.8 FPS
Test B
rank B 37.6FPS

2xMSAA
Test A
Rank B 49.5FPS
Test B
Rank B 37.1FPS
 
Last edited:
In DX9, my 5850 walks all over everything except the 5870 and GTX 480. But in DX11, even a GTX 460 is faster than my 5850. Based on the visuals, I'll be playing in DX9 and getting 80 FPS. It doesn't look good enough in DX11 to cut my framerate by almost 75%.
 
Looks pretty sweet to me.

Rig in sig, though CPU is at stock ATM. I ran it at my native res. of 1920x1200. Default settings.

I averaged 40.3FPS with all 3 tests.

I will set the CPU OC again and see if it improves any. Guess this benchmark just made up my mind on a second 5870.

P.S.

42.6 @ 3.93Ghz.
 
Last edited:
I've already posted my results in the thread i made, but since it's been buried I'll post them here. Test was done at 1920*1200 with 4xAA/16xAF with every in-game setting at high.

Test A:
[


Test B



Even though the framerates are mostly in the 30- 40 range, it still felt pretty smooth. Hopefully that won't change once I'm actually playing it and not watching. Loved the first one and can't wait to play this.
 
Alienware M11x R1
CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 @ 1.73GHz
RAM: 4GB DDR3 @ 1066MHz
GPU: NVIDIA GT335m, GeForce GPU driver v197.72, stock clocks

Native Resolution (1366x768)
Bench Settings: 1366x768, 0xAA, DX9, High
Test A: Results (22.3 fps)

Bench Settings: 1366x768, 0xAA, DX9, Medium
Test A: Results (30.5 fps)

Bench Settings: 1366x768, 0xAA, DX9, Low
Test A: Results (40.6 fps)

Bench Settings: 1366x768, 0xAA, DX9, NLN
Test A: Results (48.2 fps)

Bench Settings: 1366x768, 0xAA, DX9, NLN, Motion Blur Off
Test A: Results (52.5 fps)

Low Resolution (1024x768)
Bench Settings: 1024x768, 0xAA, DX9, High
Test A: Results (24.6 fps)

Bench Settings: 1024x768, 0xAA, DX9, Medium
Test A: Results (34.5 fps)

Bench Settings: 1024x768, 0xAA, DX9, Low
Test A: Results (41.8 fps)

Bench Settings: 1024x768, 0xAA, DX9, NLN, Motion Blur Off
Test A: Results (51.7 fps)
 
firas said:
test B DX9 @ highest settings with a Toshiba Qosmio Laptop edit: 1366x768 with the stock drivers that came with it.
Click to expand...
Toshiba Qosmio
CPU: Intel Core i7 620M (dual core) @ 2.66GHz
RAM: DDR3 @ 1333MHz
GPU: NVIDIA GT330m

Bench Settings: 1366x768, 0xAA, DX9, High
Test B: Results (12.0 fps)

piscian18 said:
billtaco said:
the game supports the SLI ???????????
terrible, 2way 480 14.6 FPS
Click to expand...

Bench Settings: 3D Surround, 5040x1050, 0xAA, DX11: Medium
Test A: Results (14.6 fps)

thats 3d surround at massive res bro.
Click to expand...

Correct. 3D = 2 frames, so it's the equivalent of running 10080x1050 @ 14.6 fps.

Still not playable. When I get home, I'll try 3840x800 (3x1280x800) and 4320x900 (3x1440x900) at 0xAA and DX 11: Medium.
 
Last edited:
Is there something wrong with the drivers or does the game look really good? A pair of GTX 480 should be destroying this.
 
SicKlown42012 said:
I've already posted my results in the thread i made, but since it's been buried I'll post them here. Test was done at 1920*1200 with 4xAA/16xAF with every in-game setting at high.
Click to expand...
yeah IRSmurf never even acknowledged your thread and kept right on trucking...
 
anonmoniker said:
Is there something wrong with the drivers or does the game look really good? A pair of GTX 480 should be destroying this.
Click to expand...

Someone commented in a previous LP2 benchmark thread the game did not look good.

I have to disagree and say Lost Planet 2 looks VERY good. It looks better than Crysis (one) and I'd say it looks even better than Just Cause 2. The player models, enemies, and environments are phenomenal in 4xMSAA.

A friend of mine told me this game looks as good as the expectations he had Mafia II. (Which looks good, but completely failed to deliver the phenomenal PC superiority we dreamed of after reading its recommended specs.)
 
littleviolin.jpg

cannondale06 said:
yeah IRSmurf never even acknowledged your thread and kept right on trucking...
Click to expand...
I acknowledge there was another thread that didn't ask people to post results or request specific information with the results, it simply said there was a benchmark. The OP got a D for effort if his intentions were to create a benchmark results thread.

See: http://hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=1526223

I don't post to win or to put my name on big threads. I post to maximize the usefulness of the collected data. If it's not in the first post, no one will read it.
 
Last edited:
just did it on a dell studio 15

Intel Core i5 520M
ATi 4570 mobile
4GB ram DDR3 ram
500GB 7200 rpm HDD


1080*1920 default settings for DX9.0c

Test A
8.26 fps
Test B
7.1 fps

Rank D

640*480 (scaled to panel height)
Test A
21.1 fps
Test B
30fps (WTF?)

Rank C
 
1680x1050, max (inc dx11), 4xAA, Test A - 32.4fps.
LP2DX112010-08-1823-04-04-97.jpg


4gb mem
cat 10.7a
 
Last edited:
IRSmurf said:
Would you mind posting your:
GPU model, including driver version if you can be bothered
CPU clocks, if overclocked
Amount of RAM
Resolution (Native doesn't equate to anything if we don't know the model of your monitor)
Click to expand...
most of that is in his sig
 
Blacklash said:
Been looking at results @ Anand and Xtremesystems too. Man ATi cards get beat down under DX11 with this bench. DX9 is perfectly fine though. If you want to run SLi with it grab the profile from nVidia.

http://www.nvidia.com/object/nvidia-multigpu-SLI-profile-update-v5-driver.html
Click to expand...

Thanks for the update. I'll use the SLI profile update tonight and look for performance increases. I'll be impressed if I was pulling all this performance on just one card's processing power.
 
YeuEmMaiMai said:
did you ever think that just maybe this game is optimized to run on Nvidia's hardware?
Click to expand...

Obvious butthurt. That doesn't change what he said. It's optimized for NVIDIA. It runs faster on NVIDIA. So do most other games. (Either optimized for NVIDIA or just better performing on NVIDIA.) Slimy? Yes. Best performing? Still, yes.
 
Yeah, i just switched from a 5870 to a 480, and my FPS in this particular bench doubled.
 
IRSmurf said:
Blacklash said:
Been looking at results @ Anand and Xtremesystems too. Man ATi cards get beat down under DX11 with this bench. DX9 is perfectly fine though. If you want to run SLi with it grab the profile from nVidia.

http://www.nvidia.com/object/nvidia-multigpu-SLI-profile-update-v5-driver.html
Click to expand...

Thanks for the update. I'll use the SLI profile update tonight and look for performance increases. I'll be impressed if I was pulling all this performance on just one card's processing power.
Click to expand...

My FPS just doubled. 100% scaling. Seriously. Good stuff!

Old: 57.7 fps Results
New: 110.4 fps Results
 
IRSmurf said:
Obvious butthurt. That doesn't change what he said. It's optimized for NVIDIA. It runs faster on NVIDIA. So do most other games. (Either optimized for NVIDIA or just better performing on NVIDIA.) Slimy? Yes. Best performing? Still, yes.
Click to expand...

obvious mentally challenged comment here lol thanks for the beyond obvious statement lol.....
 
IRSmurf said:
My FPS just doubled. 100% scaling. Seriously. Good stuff!

Old: 57.7 fps Results
New: 110.4 fps Results
Click to expand...

Ya' some folks on nVNews are loving the SLi profile update too :)

http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=2303120&postcount=5

http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=2303177&postcount=6

As far as the ATi vs nVidia thing goes if were buying today and looking to run DX11 maxed with AA @ 1920x I'd buy GTX 460 1Gb SLi and manually OC them or look for a deal on 470s.
 
Last edited:
Nice scaling on the 480 SLI IRSmurf. I'm hoping to get another GTX 480 before the end of the year.

With my rig at 1920x1080 and everything on high, I got:
- Test A: 56.7FPS
- Test B: 49.4FPS
 
I couldnt get the benchmark to run on either test 1 or test 2 in DX11 mode as it would give me an error and make me close the application. In DX9 mode it fine with an average of 84.2 fps.
 
I had to disable Crossfire to get DX11 to run. DX9 ran just fine in crossfire. I was suprised to see in DX9, huge cpu usage in test B. It used about 85% of all 6 cores on my machine.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top