lolfail9001
[H]ard|Gawd
- Joined
- May 31, 2016
- Messages
- 1,496
And even then, there is a chance that they keep it to CannonLake-U/Y, because it does make sense on SoCs above all (not to mention, CannonLake is mobile-only de facto).
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And even then, there is a chance that they keep it to CannonLake-U/Y, because it does make sense on SoCs above all (not to mention, CannonLake is mobile-only de facto).
And even then, there is a chance that they keep it to CannonLake-U/Y, because it does make sense on SoCs above all (not to mention, CannonLake is mobile-only de facto).
Now you're going to need a source for FIVR on Skylake Xeon.CNL is also coming to servers and that one has FIVR
The Kaby Lake lineup from Intel. Not that it should really be news anymore
X299 chipset for Skylake-E also confirmed.
Skylake X is almost certain to use the Kaby Lake's 14nm.Isn't it likely that Skylake-X may end up really being the same as Kaby-X? Would Intel really make Skylake-X on the old non optimized 14nm process?
Retail 7700K.
I wish motherboard manufacturers would give more comprehensive updates in their description for a given BIOS version. They'll have ME firmware and other optimizations in them which aren't disclosed to the general public. I can sometimes wring the info out of them but it's worse than pulling teeth.
So why even call it Skylake then if it is really Kaby LaKe?Skylake X is almost certain to use the Kaby Lake's 14nm.
Kaby-X is simply rumored to be a Kaby quad core on HEDT platform, while Skylake-X is the same old LCC die Xeon rejects.
So why even call it Skylake then if it is really Kaby LaKe?