I'm not saying that the iPhone OS covers up all the remaining cost. I'm just saying it wasn't even mentioned in the components that cost money breakdown.
Neither do other mobile companies.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm not saying that the iPhone OS covers up all the remaining cost. I'm just saying it wasn't even mentioned in the components that cost money breakdown.
There is no $1000 iPhone. Doesn't exist.Note that the $200 price tag only applies to locked AT&T phones, everyone else is paying $1000.00 for a 3GS.
That's a really shallow comparison. Which iPod touch has an A4 CPU, for example?Oh really?
There is no $1000 iPhone. Doesn't exist.
That's a really shallow comparison. Which iPod touch has an A4 CPU, for example?
The iPhone 3GS in all forms uses the ARM A-8, correct. But the iPad uses Apple's A4 SoC chip. They are different in many ways. The iPad's RAM is also on the CPU's die, which (theoretically) will improve performance. And the GPUs, while similar, also are not the same.The iPhone 3GS, actually. The iPad uses the same GPU as the iPod Touch and 3GS. The CPU itself is a Cortex A-8 clocked at 1ghz. The iPhone 3GS also has a Cortex A-8, just clocked at 600mhz (underclocked, actually - the CPU is rated for 800mhz). My Droid is currently running an A8 at 1.2ghz, and the Nexus One's Snapdragon ships at 1ghz. It even has the same amount of RAM as the iPhone 3GS.
People saying the iPad is simply a supersized iPod Touch are dead on. Aside from a bigger battery and a faster clocked CPU (that only competes with smartphones and no where near tablet C2D CULV speed), it has the same hardware and same software.
Seriously? Not even an intelligent comparison.
The consoles often sell for less than they are worth and even at a loss since the driving money makers are the games and accessories....which are useless without a console. See how that works? Different business model. Don't even mention the App Store or whatever. The 360 sold at a loss for a substantial amount of time as well I believe.
The iPad's RAM is also on the CPU's die, which (theoretically) will improve performance.
And the GPUs, while similar, also are not the same.
So, you're conceding that the iPad is not a giant iPod Touch?And Apple's brand of SoC isn't going to make it any faster, revolutionary, or magical. The iPad's hardware isn't any better than any other high end smartphone, and it can't compete with some of the new smartphones coming out this summer. And yet, Apple is trying to have it compete with netbooks with Atom processors and real GPUs? Even a year old netbook is going to stomp the iPad into the ground when it comes to performance.
So, you're conceding that the iPad is not a giant iPod Touch?
Shame, I almost felt my time was spent well.Hahahaha, no.
After build and assembly, the manufacturer expects to make 40% gross margin (this is what covers all the people, the buildings, etc). This does not include the profits of the people who are selling. If we assume that the main seller makes 20% of the $500, that brings it down to ~$400 to apple, then take off the 40% of that for apples gross margin and $240 for an assembled iPad. Therefore, by what you said steve...apple isn't making as much as they want too.
Actually, it's 4 iPhones running Eyefinity.So, you're conceding that the iPad is not a giant iPod Touch?
Actually, it's 4 iPhones running Eyefinity.
In other news the HP Slate has $150 in hardware and is going to sell for $550. What idiot is going to buy that
From someone who is a former hardware vender, most PC hardware gets only about 15-20% Markup over cost. Thats about average. 50% markup is very high for electronics.
Apple crap sold at 50%+ Markup
Apple tax at work. This is all old had by now.
From someone who is a former hardware vender, most PC hardware gets only about 15-20% Markup over cost. Thats about average. 50% markup is very high for electronics.
As for console comparison's, most consoles are sold at a LOSS when released. Sometimes by hundreds of $$. The first game console to ever be sold for a profit on release was the Wii. They get there money back on game licensing, and are able to slip production cost's enough to turn a slight profit some years later. I think Sony only started earning profit once it went to the Slim.
So most PC/Electronics get 20% markup
Game consoles sold at a loss
Apple crap sold at 50%+ Markup
Apple tax at work. This is all old had by now.
15-20% markup? maybe 5-10 years ago. Now thanks to places like newegg, and NCIX your lucky to get 1-2%
I'm not an Apple fan, but if someone sees a perceived value in something then who is the product complete shit?
I'll be honest. I'd like to have something bigger than my phone, but smaller than a laptop for when I'm sitting on the toilet trying to take a huge after dinner dump.
Apple has a near infinite fan base so they're multiplier is not as large as I imagined. They can pump out sales like crazy.
I think it's more accurate to say they have a small, but extremely devoted, fan base that will buy one (or more) of everything they produce.
If you bought an iPad earlier this week, you should probably avoid reading this article unless you want a bad case of buyers remorse. Everyone else...feel free to laugh.
OK, Steve, go ahead and ban me, I don't care, but this is just an absolutely moronic summary. No product ever launched sells for the cost of its parts. R&D, marketing, costs of manufacture, taxes, wages of employees, market forces, not to mention profits, all factor into the retail price of a product.
$200 of profit per sale, x 700,000 units. $140,000,000 in PROFIT.