- Joined
- May 18, 1997
- Messages
- 56,694
"Vega" has landed: hear about some of its best features and learn why it's the GPU for you from Ubisoft, Bethesda, gamers and more.
Check out the video.
Check out the video.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Their passion is all talk atm in the GPU area til they can produce the hardware.Raja with a beard!? Say it ain't so
I'm excited for this. I hope that the spirit of ATI and passion for pushing the envelope continues to grow.
I like the idea of the "Pack" to keep them out of miners' hands for the initial launch, pretty smart on their part.
Now where the hell and when the hell can I buy it!?
Golden age of gaming. I didn't have as great a gaming experience boost till the TNT2.I had to stop the video when it went something like 'it is like putting on a pair of glasses for the first time'...
I mean if it was going from an s3 virge to a voodoo1 in mechwarrior 2 I'd say yeah, but c'mon
I had to stop the video when it went something like 'it is like putting on a pair of glasses for the first time'...
I mean if it was going from an s3 virge to a voodoo1 in mechwarrior 2 I'd say yeah, but c'mon
They are almost trying too hard at this point. It's like they are trying to get as many sales as humanly possible just off of hype & marketing alone. I am dying over here waiting to see the cards tested & reviewed. Let's see the truth about Vega!
They are almost trying too hard at this point. It's like they are trying to get as many sales as humanly possible just off of hype & marketing alone. I am dying over here waiting to see the cards tested & reviewed. Let's see the truth about Vega!
Rajah knows that if he is going to compete with Nvidia is going to be with Navi.
No loyalty among Thieves I seeI liked when they riffed on the "way its meant to be played" at the end of the video. Shots Fired as a long standing nvidia owner it'd be nice to see some competition at the top end again (I hope)
I'll admit I didn't watch the propaganda video but are any actual performance numbers available yet?
I have it and it's a great monitor. Got it for about a hundred off list at microcenter - i think it was a mistake on the website as it lasted less than a day. I would warn about dead pixels though. I'm glad I went tot he store and tested it there at the q/a room witn my own laptop. The first monitor had two zones of dead pixels. The second monitor looked great and i took it home. I later found a small line of two or three daed pixels inthe top middle - totally ignoble luckily. Otherwise great color and response timesThat Samsung monitor looks interesting
I am not sure if most of us will live long enough to wait for Navi. Hell knows we waited too much for Vega.
If die size is any hint of performance, the next NVIDIA gen will have an even bigger gaming performance gap over AMD.
That does not means that AMD will lose money, because AMD owns the mining market and every single GPU they produce will be sold.
Here is another performance indicator for RX Vega 64:
![]()
Is it me, or is there hardly any Vega advantage over their previous R9 Fury X?
Fury X to Vega:
FireStrike Extreme went from 7700 to 9700 graphics score?
FireString Ultimate went from 4000 to 4800 graphics score?
Unigine Heaven went from 57fps to 64fps?
What exactly was the point of releasing this card?
I can't tell if it's just poorly made or intentionally deceptive. This really is more of a pictogram, or piece of clip art, than any sort of meaningful presentation of data.Regardless of which your preferred brand is, this chart is a hot mess.
I can't tell if it's just poorly made or intentionally deceptive. This really is more of a pictogram, or piece of clip art, than any sort of meaningful presentation of data.
Regardless of which your preferred brand is, this chart is a hot mess.
I can't tell if it's just poorly made or intentionally deceptive. This really is more of a pictogram, or piece of clip art, than any sort of meaningful presentation of data.
It is totally deceptive. I looked at the left and the numbers are low to high from left to right. Not the case on the right side of the chart.
If I hadn't looked at the numbers themselves I would have assumed that Vega was faster in everything instead of in some things.
Also, why no scores for some of the cards in certain games? Is it because the numbers didn't fit the narrative?
The graph isn't ranking FPS, it's just showing how many titles each card manages to get above 48 FPS minimum (the right-side graph), or for which the minimum FPS is less than 48 FPS. The ordering of the GPU marks isn't by FPS, but like this in each of the graphs: GTX 980 Ti, GTX 1080, Fury X, RX Vega 64.
Each of the cards has a placement for each of the games in one of the two graphs. If a card isn't listed for a game on one graph, it's because it's listed on the other graph. If the card has a minimum FPS of less than 48, it will be on the left-side graph. If its minimum FPS is more than 48, it will be shown on the right-side graph.