Intel Drafts Model Data Privacy Bill

Discussion in '[H]ard|OCP Front Page News' started by AlphaAtlas, Nov 8, 2018.

  1. AlphaAtlas

    AlphaAtlas Gawd Staff Member

    Messages:
    1,014
    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2018
    Amid a number of recent security and privacy scandals, tech-related privacy issues are getting more attention than usual. Intel itself doesn't mine as much data as Google, Facebook, Amazon and others do, but they do sell the hardware to do it, hence they have a stake in the issue. Intel told Reuters that the privacy concerns "lead to 'pushback' on electronic health records and education data systems," which is bad for business. In light of that, they've drafted a "model designed to inform policymakers and spur discussion on personal data privacy." The legislation would protect companies from fines and lawsuits "if they attest to the U.S. Federal Trade Commission annually that they take strong measures to protect consumer data." Fines would be capped at $1 billion, but the companies would not necessarily be obligated to notify customers of data breaches. Intel created a dedicated site for the bill, and is currently looking for a sponsor in Congress.

    Federal and state officials could still force companies to change their data practices and even pay restitution under the proposal, which Intel wrote and began talking to Congress members about this week in an unusual step for a corporation. But the protection from civil actions would constitute a major win for Silicon Valley tech companies that would come at the cost of being more forthright about how they process user data. Repeat offenders could lose protection, and executives who falsely certify their compliance could face criminal prosecution, according to the proposed legislation provided by the company. David Hoffman, Intel’s global privacy officer, told Reuters on Tuesday that executives’ fear of imprisonment would drive "the best privacy protection you can get."
     
  2. thenapalm

    thenapalm Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    367
    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2001
    Nope. You hold the data? You're responsible for its security.
     
    mynamehere and c3k like this.
  3. alxlwson

    alxlwson You Know Where I Live

    Messages:
    5,720
    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2013
    HFS...don't have to report the data breach?!
     
    Crackinjahcs likes this.
  4. BSmith

    BSmith [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,220
    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2017
    Politics,....bah!
     
  5. Spidey329

    Spidey329 [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    8,949
    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2003
    Lol ... That's a sham. Capped fines allow companies to weigh the savings of lax security versus the revenue potential in advance. If I can potentially make $2bil doing something I shouldn't and the risk is only a max of $1bil, where's the deterrent?

    Protecting companies from litigation if they simply declare they're secure? I'm sure Equifax's musical director would have declared to the best of her knowledge. Companies won't knowingly declare they're not secure.

    And not obligated to tell customers of breaches? No thanks, this is about as one-sided of a proposal as they could put fourth without just scribbling "f you and your data, dolla' dolla' holla' ya'll" on a napkin.
     
    jfreund, Crackinjahcs and AlphaQup like this.
  6. the-one1

    the-one1 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,947
    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2003
    Is it April Fool's already?
     
  7. viper1152012

    viper1152012 Gawd

    Messages:
    965
    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2012
  8. umeng2002

    umeng2002 Gawd

    Messages:
    809
    Joined:
    May 23, 2008
    Software companies brought it on themselves.
     
  9. katanaD

    katanaD [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,790
    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2016

    so.. they can make a "statement" we are trying.. and that then protects them from lawsuits..

    HOW convenient.. for them..

    (n)