Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
4GB should be the minimum...I currently have 6GB and I do a lot of gaming...with memory being so cheap nowadays it's easy to load up
....yep. I'm running 8Gb of Mushkin in my home system, and just bought an 8Gb kit of GSkill for a new i5 build I'm doing. Got it on sale from the Egg for well under $50.00 shipped.Actually, 8gb is really cheap nowadays. 8gb kits (2x4gb) often goes for between $25 and $40 nowadays.
I got 16GB and love it! Considering how cheap memory is these days it totally makes sense to have as most as you can get.
It makes about as much sense getting 16Gb for the average person as it does picking a forum handle of sir poop alot.
4GB is enough for most.
I have 12GB because its cheap, but even as a enthusiast I don't see much use for more than 6GB unless you are doing a RAM disk. 5 years it'll all change --- but windows 7 runs fine with even 2GB for the average person. Vista liked 4GB better. WindowsXP was fine with 1GB for the casual user and 2GB for most people.
It makes about as much sense getting 16Gb for the average person as it does picking a forum handle of sir poop alot.
4GB is enough for most.
I have 12GB because its cheap, but even as a enthusiast I don't see much use for more than 6GB unless you are doing a RAM disk. 5 years it'll all change --- but windows 7 runs fine with even 2GB for the average person. Vista liked 4GB better. WindowsXP was fine with 1GB for the casual user and 2GB for most people.
I put 16GB in just because I got sick of wondering how much better my last system would perform with 8GB instead of 4GB. Looking back I really should have gone with 8GB on the 2008 system. I don't know how much benefit I'm getting from 16GB right now, but I know that 4GB wasn't really enough for most of the Photoshop/3D/video stuff I was doing on the previous system.
But aside from performance, it just feels cool having 16GB and having that much I can spare myself all the accumulated worry over the life of the system wondering if I have enough RAM.
Yeah it seems my upgrade cycles has slowed down.
My current board - I7-920 @ 4.0ghz with 12GB of RAM is now about 3 years old and within about 10 or 15% as fast as anything currently being used by the most cutting edge fanatics...There is no real point in upgrading for gaming for a long time to come, and my machine is plenty fast for anything else I do. 12GB of RAM is vast overkill for probably the next 5 years at least. If I can just keep my upgraditis in check I'll save lots of money for a while. Those 1366 boards and $200 I7-920 processors from Microcenter were the cat's meow it seems! Mine has tripple PCI-E slots and so I've got a lot of life left in the video card arena too --- should I need to multicard at some point. I've never owned a computer that seems to have so much life expectation remaining on three year old hardware! Three year old hardware in the pentium 100 era, would have put you about 500% faster when you upgraded your machine to a p2 450mhz.
Going to run a relatively large RAMDisk =D
Have you found running a ramdisk helpful, or more of a novelty? What kind of uses have you put it to?
There was an article on Tom's [I think] which tested various RAM amounts and there was a definite improvement in going 8GB or higher if you're a gamer and have a videocard with 1GB or more on it. I don't remember the specifics but it had something to do with the virtual graphics memory set aside by the system so 8GB is probably the minimum gamer amount. There was 1 game with an hi-res texture addon which showed the best was 12 GB but it was the only case which needed that much. Who knows? Maybe [hopefully] next gen games will need it too![]()
Maxing out a sandy bridge system is anything but cheap. 8GB desktop modules are still rare and expensive.I'd say, get as much as you can afford. Ram is so cheap as of late that its extremely easy and cost effective to max out your board