• Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
    Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.

Graphics: Xbox 360 vs PS3

CleanSlate said:
There's virtually no difference in graphics quality.
Click to expand...

um , yeah , ok,

have you even looked at the comparison?

i have, and there is a pretty big difference


virtually no difference, who is this guy kidding?

xbox360
ps3vs360055.jpg


ps3
ps3vs360056.jpg
 
bobrownik said:
um , yeah , ok,

have you even looked at the comparison?

i have, and there is a pretty big difference


virtually no difference, who is this guy kidding?
Click to expand...

Why do you still post here? We already know you love Xbox, we don't need you chiming in every other post to tell us Sony sucks. Thanks.

Anyways, Gamespot did a semi-valid comparison, but what did you expect? The 360 has been out for a full year. Its got great graphics. The PS3 is young, and it's definately got potential. In fact, if you aren't a programmer, I don't see how any of your arguments are valid on which console will have the better graphics. You can look up and throw out numbers all you want, but both systems will have games that will amaze you. I don't see why anybody has to hate on a console so much.
 
Valcrist77 said:
Why do you still post here?
Click to expand...

i post here becuse Bush haven't made forums illegal yet ,
and i like to bring up what other people try to cover up ,

not my fault you don't like the truth
 
360 details look A LOT better. and the light illumination is 1000% better than in the ps3.
 
What does this thread have to do with video cards??? and how did it get to 7 pages without being locked???
 
Valcrist77 said:
Why do you still post here? We already know you love Xbox, we don't need you chiming in every other post to tell us Sony sucks. Thanks.

Anyways, Gamespot did a semi-valid comparison, but what did you expect? The 360 has been out for a full year. Its got great graphics. The PS3 is young, and it's definately got potential. In fact, if you aren't a programmer, I don't see how any of your arguments are valid on which console will have the better graphics. You can look up and throw out numbers all you want, but both systems will have games that will amaze you. I don't see why anybody has to hate on a console so much.
Click to expand...

You know, when the images are placed side by side like that, how can you defend the PS3?

The fact that they're ports, which means the graphics should at least be similar, really hurts the PS3 in this regard. Yes, obviously there's untapped potential in the PS3, but you can see clear signs of aliasing in those shots. Regardless of the game structure, the engine is applying a terrible AA algorithm (if at all).

With the recent news of older PS2 games not running well on the PS3, it's just another blow for Sony's new product.

Anyone that says the PS3 sucks because it's got terrible graphics need to wait a year. As of now, the Xbox destroys the new console, but who knows what's going to happen in a few months.

But as of now, anyone that purchases a PS3 over the Xbox 360 for it's graphical capabilities, is a F@NBOY. Disregarding game titles (which IMO are more important than graphics) buying a PS3 now is like buying an AM2 system.

It's quite sad, actually, as the majority of memorable games I've played were on the PS1 or PS2.
 
bobrownik said:
yup rsx blows,

the only way i would buy a ps3 is if it came with a free blowjob and a $600 mail in rebate

um , yeah , ok,

have you even looked at the comparison?

i have, and there is a pretty big difference


virtually no difference, who is this guy kidding?



i post here becuse Bush haven't made forums illegal yet ,
and i like to bring up what other people try to cover up ,

not my fault you don't like the truth
Click to expand...

No we don't like people who think they know everything, and sound like a dick while they spout
 
Arcygenical said:
You know, when the images are placed side by side like that, how can you defend the PS3?

The fact that they're ports, which means the graphics should at least be similar, really hurts the PS3 in this regard. Yes, obviously there's untapped potential in the PS3, but you can see clear signs of aliasing in those shots. Regardless of the game structure, the engine is applying a terrible AA algorithm (if at all).

With the recent news of older PS2 games not running well on the PS3, it's just another blow for Sony's new product.

Anyone that says the PS3 sucks because it's got terrible graphics need to wait a year. As of now, the Xbox destroys the new console, but who knows what's going to happen in a few months.

But as of now, anyone that purchases a PS3 over the Xbox 360 for it's graphical capabilities, is a F@NBOY. Disregarding game titles (which IMO are more important than graphics) buying a PS3 now is like buying an AM2 system.

It's quite sad, actually, as the majority of memorable games I've played were on the PS1 or PS2.
Click to expand...

No one is defending the PS3, nor does anyone have to. If someone dislikes the PS3, then refrain from buying it.

That aside, like I said, theres no doubt that right now, the Xbox has a great lead, and Sony's management is getting way too cocky. What Sony needs to do is stop making claims, and start backing up thrid party developers. Their mindset is stuck on their machine magically winning the "war" by itself, partly evident by the way their try to push the whole media center thing with it. Sony makes great products, but just doesn't follow through with whats needed to make them truly great. The PSP I can let go because they haven't done handheld gaming before, but I really do not want to see them fail the PS3.
All that being said, I have no idea what's going to happen. The PS2 launched with some rather unimpressive games itself, and in just a year, great games were coming out. Why anyone wouldn't want Sony to repeat this success is beyond me.

I'm looking forward to some great games coming out to this system. But for now, its not anything too amazing.
 
Who ever says there's a big difference is flat lying to either us or us and themselves. Clearly the only difference is the way the graphics cards handle the light reflections and saturation of the light. The textures look exactly the same minus the light differences... So, who are you kidding?

To be honest I could care less who is the best. Consoles are for people who can't reformat a hard drive without a manual and three calls to tech support.

~Adam
 
CleanSlate said:
Who ever says there's a big difference is flat lying to either us or us and themselves. Clearly the only difference is the way the graphics cards handle the light reflections and saturation of the light. The textures look exactly the same minus the light differences... So, who are you kidding?
Click to expand...

It's very obvious that the PS3 shot posted above has lower res textures. How can you not notice that?
 
its pretty sad that sony makes all teh claims but arent willing to put up.

When the xbox came out it completely destroyed the ps2 in terms of graphics abilities.

Luckily the ps2 had great games by then. But now sony has barely any good games out and its grpahics potnetial are still unknown.
 
yeah first was nintendo then sony now maybe xbox 360, it's interesting.
wait a minute!:( isn't the xbox = ms:( :) oh no!!!!:(
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top