Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
does it need another thread
but yea I'm not believin NUTTIN till the official word or better previews are out
[*img]http://cdn.overclock.net/4/4e/600x437px-LL-4ede5d73_kepler4.png[/img]
Interesting because 8x MSAA is not an option in bf3.
Another fake slide, another day. I want real benchmarks.
Same here. Performance rumored will be impressive if true but i'm sick of the fake slides.
Override AA does not work in bf3 with the last set of drivers I used before selling 580s, that was 285.79? I think. Further, using override AA in a dx11 title that includes all of the IQ options that bf3 is the height of stupidity, and very unlikely.
I look forward to the [H] review of these cards. If the rumors are true the card will certainly be impressive but this source doesn't look legitimate at all.
Same here. Performance rumored will be impressive if true but i'm sick of the fake slides.
Override AA does not work in bf3 with the last set of drivers I used before selling 580s, that was 285.79? I think. Further, using override AA in a dx11 title that includes all of the IQ options that bf3 is the height of stupidity, and very unlikely.
I look forward to the [H] review of these cards. If the rumors are true the card will certainly be impressive but this source doesn't look legitimate at all.
How exactly is it impressive though? It appears merely even to the 7970, and it's late. We've been used to Nvidia having a 15-20% advantage on AMD the last generations, so I'd say the rumored performance is actually rather disappointing.
Looking good to me if most of the 680 could reach THIS clock.
That's supposed to be the default clock, using the new turbo feature.
That's supposed to be the default clock, using the new turbo feature.
What ever happened to the performance that could match 3 GTX 580 from the sameratine video at GDC? If this has 3 times as many rendering pipes as the 580s then why is its performance so low? I mean a 200% increase in the number of pipes and yet were seeing only a 25% performance increase here. Not to mention the that their road map stated that kepler was supposed to be 2x faster than Firmi, and then the next gen was supposed to be 8x faster than firmi.
http://www.maximumpc.com/article/home/nvidia_unveils_gpu_roadmap
I know this is for the CUDA performance scale, but even still the CUDA performance should also reflect on the GFX performance should it not?
Edit: Ok after reading more into the article the CUDA performance is supposed to be 16 faster with Maxwell and the GFX performance is supposed to be 3x faster on Maxwell not Kepler, but still the 200% pipe line increase seems underwhelming on this chart
What ever happened to the performance that could match 3 GTX 580 from the sameratine video at GDC? If this has 3 times as many rendering pipes as the 580s then why is its performance so low? I mean a 200% increase in the number of pipes and yet were seeing only a 25% performance increase here. Not to mention the that their road map stated that kepler was supposed to be 2x faster than Firmi, and then the next gen was supposed to be 8x faster than firmi.
http://www.maximumpc.com/article/home/nvidia_unveils_gpu_roadmap
I know this is for the CUDA performance scale, but even still the CUDA performance should also reflect on the GFX performance should it not?
Edit: Ok after reading more into the article the CUDA performance is supposed to be 16 faster with Maxwell and the GFX performance is supposed to be 3x faster on Maxwell not Kepler, but still the 200% pipe line increase seems underwhelming on this chart
If it can match or beat the 7970 while also using less power, that would be quite a change from previous generations where Nvidia needed a bigger, more power-hungry chip to beat them. I think 10% faster at stock speeds is still possible, so they'd be right where they normally are.
Why do people post fake slides? What's the point? to sabotage the product prior to release or create hype?
http://news.softpedia.com/newsImage...n-AMD-Radeon-HD-7970-in-New-Benchmarks-6.jpg/
Here's that slide that doesn't cover up the 7970s results on Battlefield 3.