cptnjarhead
Crossfit Fast Walk Champion Runnerup
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2010
- Messages
- 1,669
You seemed pretty defensive on the subject. If it didn't bother you why did you go out of your way to make me feel bad about criticizing your use of words?
But you just ignored my explanation on why your critique is too harsh.
Yes it was. You could even say it was deliberate nitpicking. As was his critique of the video. That was part of the point.
It was not my intention to be defensive, or make you feel bad, but it was your intention to "nitpick" my explanation. My criticism of the video was not intentional, it was my initial reaction. Even if they live in the vault, it looked like it had been open for a long time, and the female looked like she walked out of a beauty salon, he was clean shaven, they just look out of place. Its not harsh, its what i see. Then i start to look for other problems, instead of trying to enjoy the film. They did a lot of things right, but making people look dirty, hungry and desperate does not require a big budget, and thats what bothers me, its just lazy. Now, if they would have shown a pristine settlement, compound or something like the institute, just before the two actors, then i could see them looking that way, but every thing was desolate and decaying right up until you see them. There are a lot of big-budget films that i have never finished because of details just like that. Call me a snob, or harsh, but its no different than many on this site who criticize hardware.