gigaxtreme1
2[H]4U
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2002
- Messages
- 3,577
Too precious.
https://www.amd.com/en/campaigns/threadripper-exchange
https://www.amd.com/en/campaigns/threadripper-exchange
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Makes sense. Instead of holding back computing with lower core counts even longer amd is offering to finally advance it with more computing power.
Yes by exchanging a limited collectible for a gaming processor while they won't make a gaming graphics card...because they love gamers...
if you buy a 16 core cpu for gaming you need to give your a head a shake.
also this has literally nothing at all to do with gaming.
fuck, the word gaming isn't even found on that amd page.
for a flagship 16-core AMD Ryzen™ Threadripper™ 1950X processor built for the gamers and creators who need a processor that can do it all.
except for here:
You mean except for the very paragraph talking about the exchange? Other than there right?![]()
It's almost like the context says "gamers AND creaters".
Holy shit. Context.
Yeah, and screw Intel! They won't make gamer GPUs either! For that matter, screw Nvidia! They won't make high-end CPUs for gamers!Yes, holy shit context, they mentioned gamers in there specifically. The same gamers they won't make high end graphics cards for... I am not seeing your point here?
Yeah, and screw Intel! They won't make gamer GPUs either! For that matter, screw Nvidia! They won't make high-end CPUs for gamers!
The difference being that Intel doesnt currently make discrete GPUs, nor does Nvidia make CPUs. AMD on the other hand makes both. I just find it ironic they would actively describe threadripper as a CPU for gamers considering their stance in the GPU market.
AMD said "gamers and creators," the operative word being and, the obvious jab at Intel being that on their product stack you are stuck with a processor that's only good for one or the other.(Disclaimer: I know this is absolutely ridiculous, but it's too funny to me not to post.)
A company does not need to make high performance versions of all their products just because they make high performance versions of one of their products. That'd be like expecting Boeing to make super-sonic passenger jets because they make supersonic military jets...or expecting Honda to make turbo-charged lawnmowers because they make turbo-charged cars.The difference being that Intel doesnt currently make discrete GPUs, nor does Nvidia make CPUs. AMD on the other hand makes both. I just find it ironic they would actively describe threadripper as a CPU for gamers considering their stance in the GPU market.
Yeah, and screw Intel! They won't make gamer GPUs either! For that matter, screw Nvidia! They won't make high-end CPUs for gamers!
(Disclaimer: I know this is absolutely ridiculous, but it's too funny to me not to post.)
I'd personally take AMD's trade offer, but then if I were ever going to have entered into that contest for an i7-8086k, it wouldn't have been for the collector's value...![]()
What if you game at 4K?if you buy a 16 core cpu for gaming you need to give your a head a shake.
also this has literally nothing at all to do with gaming.
fuck, the word gaming isn't even found on that amd page.
Then you're gpu boundWhat if you game at 4K?
I was thinking of the DC projects it could do.Then you're gpu bound
Unless you stream encode and game at the same time.
Then give er
if you buy a 16 core cpu for gaming you need to give your a head a shake.
also this has literally nothing at all to do with gaming.
fuck, the word gaming isn't even found on that amd page.