Hey all
Ok, In the past I always went AMD because of performance and lower temps. However, I'm way overdue for an upgrade.
Current specs:
AMD Athlon XP 2600+
128MB Geforce 6600GT
1GB Corsair XMS PC3200
I primarily need a gaming PC and of all the canned benchmarks I've seen, it seems the E6600 is the better choice. However I haven't yet found a real world gaming test that compares the E6600 and 4800+. From what I have seen though the E6600 seems to be able to keep pace or out perform an FX-62 which honestly confuses the hell out of me but the canned benchmarks could be the culprit although the E6600 does feature a 4MB L2 cache over AMD's 2MB L2 cache.
Also, it is the socket 939 4800+ I was looking at which is closer in price to the E6600 not the AM2 version which is around $700 (lolz). What I really want is a fast processor for current games like Battlefield 2, Call of Duty 2, Counter-strike: Source etc. but will also fair well once UT2K7 is out.
The other key part I was looking at was the videocard: a X1900 XT, 7800/7900 GTX, or X1950 XTX
the X1900 XT seems to be the best value in terms of price/performance. However, the X1950 XT is only $100 more and is on par with the 7950 GX2. The only reason I was considering the 7900/7800 GTX is [H] seems to have had difficult times with crossfire in the past...
The final option would be to wait for quad cores... But I'd really rather not wait and even if I save the money there is no gaurantees I will be able to afford it or that games will even support more than 2 cores... though I'm certain they will.
So now comes the fun part... what's everyones opinion?
So far I'm leaning toward the X1950 XTX with the E6600.
Current specs:
AMD Athlon XP 2600+
128MB Geforce 6600GT
1GB Corsair XMS PC3200
I primarily need a gaming PC and of all the canned benchmarks I've seen, it seems the E6600 is the better choice. However I haven't yet found a real world gaming test that compares the E6600 and 4800+. From what I have seen though the E6600 seems to be able to keep pace or out perform an FX-62 which honestly confuses the hell out of me but the canned benchmarks could be the culprit although the E6600 does feature a 4MB L2 cache over AMD's 2MB L2 cache.
Also, it is the socket 939 4800+ I was looking at which is closer in price to the E6600 not the AM2 version which is around $700 (lolz). What I really want is a fast processor for current games like Battlefield 2, Call of Duty 2, Counter-strike: Source etc. but will also fair well once UT2K7 is out.
The other key part I was looking at was the videocard: a X1900 XT, 7800/7900 GTX, or X1950 XTX
the X1900 XT seems to be the best value in terms of price/performance. However, the X1950 XT is only $100 more and is on par with the 7950 GX2. The only reason I was considering the 7900/7800 GTX is [H] seems to have had difficult times with crossfire in the past...
The final option would be to wait for quad cores... But I'd really rather not wait and even if I save the money there is no gaurantees I will be able to afford it or that games will even support more than 2 cores... though I'm certain they will.
So now comes the fun part... what's everyones opinion?
So far I'm leaning toward the X1950 XTX with the E6600.