klowngoblin
[H]ard|Gawd
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2001
- Messages
- 1,087
pretty big diffrence here, ive noticed that 32K is WAY faster than 64K for stripe size
64K
32K
64K
32K
![[H]ard|Forum](/styles/hardforum/xenforo/logo_dark.png){kind=logo}
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Diffrence in performance 32K and 64K Stripe
- Thread starter klowngoblin
- Start date
burningrave101
[H]F Junkie
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2003
- Messages
- 11,825
Stripe size performance normally depends on how large of files your working with as to which is faster. For normal desktop usage the smallest size your RAID controller supports will usually yield the best performance.
klowngoblin
[H]ard|Gawd
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2001
- Messages
- 1,087
i do dvd encoding so i need it at 32K, most files on there are over 500MB
That looks like one piss poor driver causing results like that. Also, that CPU usage is REALLY high. Way to get ninja-1337 scores in a synthetic test though. Also, that burst rate looks pretty weak too - I can get 135MB/sec burst out of RAID-0 on ICH5R with two Samsung SP1213C's.