• Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
    Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.

Diffrence in performance 32K and 64K Stripe

klowngoblin

[H]ard|Gawd
Joined
Oct 28, 2001
Messages
1,087
pretty big diffrence here, ive noticed that 32K is WAY faster than 64K for stripe size

64K
SeagateDual80GBSATA.jpg


32K
Seagate80x2GBRaid032K.jpg
 
Stripe size performance normally depends on how large of files your working with as to which is faster. For normal desktop usage the smallest size your RAID controller supports will usually yield the best performance.
 
Onboard RAID controller? ... limited to the bandwidth of the PCI bus?
 
That looks like one piss poor driver causing results like that. Also, that CPU usage is REALLY high. Way to get ninja-1337 scores in a synthetic test though. Also, that burst rate looks pretty weak too - I can get 135MB/sec burst out of RAID-0 on ICH5R with two Samsung SP1213C's.
 
Back
Top