Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
GotNoRice said:A lot of people are ditching their old CRT's for LCD's, and so you can probably go on ebay or your local craigslist and pick a 21" up for under $100. Thats if you don't mind getting a used monitor but often times you can get a higher model such as a trinitron and those still cost $$$ new.
yea, ditching a power hungry, heat-making, bulky, blurry, geometrically incorrect, heavy, glarry, flickering CRT sounds like a horrible idea. the guy was just making a suggestion and if you have unbiased info you can offer, then by all means help him out cause that's what posting here should be about.Greenwit said:Yeah, they are "ditching" their CRTs for another technology that gives you a fixed resolution, retinal burning brightness, gray blacks, dead pixels, backlighting, and motion blur/ghosting. Good gawd, who wouldn't "ditch" their CRT for all that goodness. Lemmings!!!!! LOL!![]()
LunchboX3904 said:yea, ditching a power hungry, heat-making, bulky, blurry, geometrically incorrect, heavy, glarry, flickering CRT sounds like a horrible idea. the guy was just making a suggestion and if you have unbiased info you can offer, then by all means help him out cause that's what posting here should be about.
Stu55, I'd say stick to a 19" CRT. it'll easily be the best bang for the buck. I had a 19" Samsung 997DF and didn't really enjoy it, but NEC's are really good and not that much more.
![]()
A CRT geometrically perfect? Sure...Greenwit said:My NEC FE2111 doesn't flicker, it isn't glarry (too ironic, given the retinal burning brightness of big screen LCDs), and it *is* geometrically perfect. Yes, it is heavy. And maybe you like to take your CRT (when you owned one) for walks around the block, but, believe it or not, when I sit my CRT on my desktop, there it stays. Unbelieveable but true. It does make more heat than an LCD and it does use *slightly* more power (132W v. 90W for the 2001fp). If that is your reason for selecting a monitor that is fixed in resolution, cannot keep up with fast games, is susceptible to backlighting and pixel failure, is susceptible to interpolation artifacts at lower resolution, cannot display true black, looks absolutely sh*tty playing Doom3, then I am happy for you. I am the one being unbiased and you're the one with the anti-CRT vacuous talking points.![]()
crt's fuck up your eyes. lcd's dont. so thereGreenwit said:Yeah, they are "ditching" their CRTs for another technology that gives you a fixed resolution, retinal burning brightness, gray blacks, dead pixels, backlighting, and motion blur/ghosting. Good gawd, who wouldn't "ditch" their CRT for all that goodness. Lemmings!!!!! LOL!![]()
Well then i'm pretty screwed then eh? I have been using one foreverryanrule said:crt's fuck up your eyes. lcd's dont. so there
Roger said:A CRT geometrically perfect? Sure...
No CRT has perfect geometry. That's kind of like saying "my LCD has perfect blacks". Flat faced CRTs always have some problems with curved/warped corners and linearity. Vertical geometric distortions are corectable most of the time but horizontal ones are often a problem. Horizontal lines at the top and bottom of the screen usually bow inwards. Combined with the refractive index of the front glass it makes the screen appear concave although the actual surface is slightly convex. I have a Mitsubishi 930SB and it's good but far from perfect geometry wise.Greenwit said:We aren't talking about about the old curved screen CRTs of the past. Mine is flat-surfaced and the test patterns I run through it show no geometric problems. With LCDs you have geometric problems whenever you can't run native resolution. Like newer games which push your hardware to the limit. Me? I just bump down the resolution. You can do the same.....but with geometric distortion and interpolation artifacts. I just love those oval golf balls in TW2005 when you play anything but 1600 lines of resolution. They are way too kewl.BTW, I should point out that I owned both a 2001fp and NEC FE2111 simultaneously....and returned the Dell.
Roger said:No CRT has perfect geometry. That's kind of like saying "my LCD has perfect blacks". Flat faced CRTs always have some problems with curved/warped corners and linearity. Vertical geometric distortions are corectable most of the time but horizontal ones are often a problem. Horizontal lines at the top and bottom of the screen usually bow inwards. Combined with the refractive index of the front glass it makes the screen appear concave although the actual surface is slightly convex. I have a Mitsubishi 930SB and it's good but far from perfect geometry wise.
Sorry but no CRT has perfect geometry. It's just the way it is. It may be good, it may be even very good but no perfect. That's the point I'm trying to make. In years of expirience of testing and reviewing monitors I've never came across a CRT that is perfect geometry wise and I've tested monitors that are more expensive and just better than the FE2111. It may not be noticeable unless you look for it but the same could be said about backlight leakage on LCDs and that doesn't mean it's perfect.Greenwit said:Sorry but mine has perfect geometry. The geometric test patterns I've DL'd from NECs website provides a number of patterns including edge alignment along the limits of the screen, diagonal lines and circles. Really, you just have to give up the argument cause it just ain't true. Whatever distortions that occurred when I got the monitor are fixable through the various convergence and alignment adjustments you can make. And even if you were to spot a miniscule misalignment you could only see it through test patterns.
Roger said:Sorry but no CRT has perfect geometry. It's just the way it is. It may be good, it may be even very good but no perfect. That's the point I'm trying to make. In years of expirience of testing and reviewing monitors I've never came across a CRT that is perfect geometry wise and I've tested monitors that are more expensive and just better than the FE2111. It may not be noticeable unless you look for it but the same could be said about backlight leakage on LCDs and that doesn't mean it's perfect.
Alrighty then, my LCD has no backlight issues at all, no blurring whatsoever has perfect blacks and has the same viewing angles as a CRT. Using your logic, you can't say I'm wrong since you haven't seen my monitorGreenwit said:You are wrong. Mine is perfect. It has been calibrated and tested. The only thing you have said that makes sense (you make no sense arguing about the geometry of my monitor when you haven't seen it) is that it possible to not see geometric defects unless you look for them. If you cannot see a flaw then it doesn't belong in the CRT bashing talking points of LCD fans. Backlighting on the other hand is NOT fixable.....not practically speaking, short of opening up the monitor itself or returning it. I've seen some gawd awful screenies of backlighting in corners from 2005fpw owners that you can't help but notice. Geometry IS fixable.
That's the only point I was trying to make. Just because you have to look for something to notice it doesn't make it perfect. Same with blurring and backlight issues on LCDs. Many LCDs blur very little and you can see the backlight only if you turn off all the lights in the room and look at the screen at a distance of 5 inches or something. That still doesn't mean they're perfect. None of them are.oqvist said:As for geometry the LCD is slightly better but there is such little difference you will only see it if you look at it.
Roger said:Alrighty then, my LCD has no backlight issues at all, no blurring whatsoever has perfect blacks and has the same viewing angles as a CRT. Using your logic, you can't say I'm wrong since you haven't seen my monitorYou can say what you want but no CRT has perfect geometry. That is a fact. I bet your CRT has no damper wires either since you can't see them
![]()
You've never seen someone returning a CRT because of bad geometry? I have to say I have, lots of time. That's besides the point, though. I was not saying geometry problems on CRTs are worse than backlight issues on LCDs. I meant that no LCD has perfect backlight just like no CRT has perfect geometry. If you can see it when you look for it, it's not really perfect now is it? Either way, I'm tired of this kind of discussions. Why does everything have to turn into silly CRT vs LCD wars here? I have both and enjoy in advantages of both technologies and it's funny to see the CRT and LCD fans trying to convince each other that their monitor is superior at everything.Greenwit said:Nonsensical argument. People don't return CRTs for adjustable geometry. They do return them for backlighting and blurring. Why? Because they are bugged by these things and they cannot fix them! This is too easy, try again.![]()
Roger said:You've never seen someone returning a CRT because of bad geometry? I have to say I have, lots of time. That's besides the point, though. I was not saying geometry problems on CRTs are worse than backlight issues on LCDs. I meant that no LCD has perfect backlight just like no CRT has perfect geometry. If you can see it when you look for it, it's not really perfect now is it? Either way, I'm tired of this kind of discussions. Why does everything have to turn into silly CRT vs LCD wars here? I have both and enjoy in advantages of both technologies and it's funny to see the CRT and LCD fans trying to convince each other that their monitor is superior at everything.