Creative Labs Sound BlasterX AE-5

Discussion in 'Computer Audio' started by CrimsonKnight13, Jun 13, 2017.

  1. CrimsonKnight13

    CrimsonKnight13 [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    6,770
    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2008
    mhl1.jpg

    • 122DB DNR SABRE-CLASS DAC FOR UP TO 32-BIT/384KHZ HIGH-RES LOSSLESS AUDIO
    • BUILT-IN RGB CONTROLLER WITH 16 MILLION COLORS AURORA REACTIVE LIGHTING
    SCOUT RADAR LETS YOU PINPOINT YOUR ENEMY ON A RADAR DISPLAY ON YOUR SMARTPHONE OR TABLET
    • DISCRETE AMP FOR PRISTINE INDIVIDUAL HEADPHONE CHANNEL AMPLIFICATION WITH A DUAL-AMP DESIGN. ULTRA-LOW 1Ω OUTPUT IMPEDANCE FOR STUDIO-GRADE HEADPHONES AND IN-EAR MONITORS
    • BLASTERX ACOUSTIC ENGINE WITH INDUSTRY-LEADING AUDIO PROCESSING FOR IMMERSIVE 7.1 SURROUND SOUND, BASS BOOST AND CLEARER VOCALS

    Advertisement: http://view.ed4.net/v/20JBRYT/TTAJW/J6E6LNE/XH5XAG/

    Press Release: http://www.creative.com/corporate/pressroom/?id=13549

    Product Page: https://us.creative.com/p/sound-cards/sound-blasterx-ae-5

    It's retailing at $149.99 for pre-order. For anyone with the Sound Blaster Z series, I'm not sure if the upgrade is worth it or not.
     
    Last edited: Jun 13, 2017
  2. Bandalo

    Bandalo 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,146
    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2010
    That's what my sound solution was missing.....RGB LEDs! Thankfully SOME great manufacturer stepped up and provided a solution.
     
  3. GotNoRice

    GotNoRice [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    9,969
    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2001
    Even the Z series wasn't really an upgrade over what came before (X-Fi Titanium series). They have to continuously "re-invent the wheel" by creating new features that simply replace old features that did the exact same thing. X-Fi series had CMSS-3D for positional audio, Z series had SBX Pro Studio, now this series has "BLASTERX ACOUSTIC ENGINE". In the same way that SBX Pro Studio wasn't any better than CMSS-3D (worse in some ways), will this "BLASTERX ACOUSTIC ENGINE" be any better than either of the others? As far as the lights go, gimmicks make me sad :(
     
  4. thesmokingman

    thesmokingman 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    3,578
    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2008
    Omg, RGB!!! That's what I've always wanted in my soundcard!
     
  5. michalrz

    michalrz 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,269
    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2012
    Great now the RGB circuit (dimmable light?) can add yet additional source of whine.
    But yeah the low output impedance is decent. Objective2 has around 0.5.
    Of course the omg 122 db power is only mentioned for the DAC and not for the actual output.
    They will never learn to stop the bullshit and people will never learn to quit buying into bullshit.
     
  6. Tup3x

    Tup3x [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,580
    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2011
    If the real world price with VAT is not utterly ridiculous... I might upgrade.

    Can someone explain why the 1 ohm output impedance is a good thing? Sensitive headphones don't blast your ears into oblivion? Currently that's a big problem with Zx... Headphone out and even line out are unusable without volume pot. My HD 595s are just way too loud.

    I hope that they would make a cheaper version without all that useless led crap. For those who care about sound. I don't want a light blaster.
     
    Last edited: Jun 13, 2017
  7. djoye

    djoye 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,463
    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2004
    Not touching another Creative product until it's a sound card with HDMI output, I'll even settle for one that requires a display attached since my receiver takes care of that.

    I would pay extra for an HDMI expansion card if I could be guaranteed the old EAX support plus whatever new tech they have as long as it supports the full range of sampling rates; Nvidia GPUs don't support 88.2 kHz so playing SACD rips over HDMI through WASAPI doesn't work.

    P.S. I have one of those HDAV 1.3 X-Fi cards in the attic, not sure if it works correctly anymore. Want something with new tech.
     
  8. WhoBeDaPlaya

    WhoBeDaPlaya [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,900
    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2002
    I might get some of these .... when they're clearing them out for $49 at Fry's :p
    Sticking with my varrious modded X-Fis for now (XtremeMusic, XtremeGamer, Ti, Ti Fatal1ty)
     
  9. Ocellaris

    Ocellaris Ginger Ale, an alcoholic's best friend.

    Messages:
    17,583
    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2008
    I liked my Z however I just found it too damn loud. I could only use between 0 and 24 in Windows before it was blowing out my ears. The range was so small I would often open new apps and the sound was crazy loud compared to the last app. The Z had no way to adjust the headphone amplification level. I stopped using the card because of this, really frustrating. If I adjusted the sound levels on a per app basis, I would just forget about it and then blow out my ears when I opened a new game that I hadn't adjusted down yet... I woukd totally buy this if the amp output level can be adjusted in the software.

    Update: Page 13 of the PDF makes it look like the level is adjustable this time. Ordering the card now, booyah!
     
    Last edited: Jun 14, 2017
  10. Tup3x

    Tup3x [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,580
    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2011
    Hey, that pretty good range... I can only use between 0 and 4 % if I don't use the ACM. With ACM I can do 10% when ACM is at 66% (it lowers the volume even at 100%). And I'm talking about line out, not the headphone out.
     
    Last edited: Jun 14, 2017
  11. Nenu

    Nenu Pick your own.....you deserve it.

    Messages:
    17,048
    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2007
    It looks like they want us to mistake DNR (Dynamic Range) for SNR (Signal to Noise Ratio).
    The raw Dynamic Range can be lost in the noise floor so means little without full specs of the circuits output signal.
    The DNR is of the DAC chip only not the circuit its used in, they havent given information about the product they make.
    The SNR isnt specified. It is the important figure.
    More info on DNR vs SNR http://www.prosoundweb.com/channels/av/the_differences_between_dynamic_range_signal-to-noise_ratio/
    "A system with wide dynamic range may have poor signal-to-noise due to the way that it is operated. Dynamic range can be used to describe the performance that is possible to achieve with a system or device, whereas signal-to-noise ratio might be used to describe what is actually achieved in practice.
    ...
    In designing systems, we choose individual components that have wide dynamic range, and then calibrate and operate the system for the maximum signal-to-noise ratio that we can achieve."

    The product page doesnt say which DAC chip they are using, its probably the Sabre32 9016 Ultra.
    Not bad for low cost devices but not the second coming.
    They know that EMI and electrical noise inside a PC precludes the use of a better DAC chip because its benefit wont be heard.
    fyi

    An external DAC with a better chip will give you more detail and more robust connections, but multichannel versions tend to cost a fair bit and will need to use HDMI audio in for uncompressed multichannel.
    If you dont care about serious detail this new card is worth a look.
    Being PCIe is convenient, no need to mess with HDMI and potential audio delays.

    I found a page with more info
    http://e3expo.vporoom.com/2017-06-1...-Sound-Card-with-Worlds-Best-PC-Headphone-Amp
    It uses the Sabre32 9016K2m Ultra DAC.

    It is a step up for general PC audio quality with internal cards.
    I'm interested to know if it can resolve the detail of 192KHz or 384KHz audio, listening tests using a good hifi system are needed.
     
  12. thedeuce53

    thedeuce53 n00bie

    Messages:
    1
    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2017
    Okay, I'm sure this is a dumb question, but what is a better audio solution for gaming and movie watching: this new card, or the X7 external amp? Thanks in advance.
     
  13. ashmelev75

    ashmelev75 [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,446
    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2007
    Get an HDMI receiver and forget about the sound card nonsense for good. There's no good reason to buy this card or X7 amp.

    I've been using this one for a long time: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00V5VJ3TM/
     
  14. GotNoRice

    GotNoRice [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    9,969
    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2001
    What exactly do you need it to do? How do you intend to use it? It's been over 10 years since soundcards had an actual impact on the games themselves (EAX Hardware audio acceleration for example, which XP was the last to support). There are other features however that you might find useful. You can use features on the card to take a multi-channel source and down-mix it to stereo, or you can take a stereo source and up-mix it to multi-channel. Both can be convenient depending on the setup you are running.

    I would not go with the X7, but I don't personally like combo devices like that. If you are going to get an external DAC or a headphone amplifier, there are better choices available. A good route to go (assuming you use headphones) would be to get a creative soundcard for it's gaming features (can be a lower-end model, since you just want the features, not for it to have a good DAC or headphone amp of it's own), run optical output from there to an external DAC, and then have that connected to a separate dedicated headphone amplifier.

    HDMI into a receiver can be useful if your goal is a multi-channel speaker setup using actual speakers (not computer speakers), as HDMI allows for lossless digital multi-channel audio. That's not really what you want if you are going to primarily use headphones though, as you can easily get better DACs and headphone amplifiers compared to what is built-in to most receivers.
     
  15. RogueTadhg

    RogueTadhg Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    486
    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2011
    The sarcasm was palpable. Simply beautiful.
     
    Bandalo likes this.
  16. NamelessPFG

    NamelessPFG Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    156
    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2016
    I still don't see myself replacing my X-Fi Titanium HD with this thing. Creative killed hardware OpenAL support with Sound Core3D, and thus killed my interest in all their later products. The software OpenAL implementation, even with the claims of EAX and EFX, just doesn't sound right at all compared to proper X-Fi hardware, to say nothing of how THX/SBX Pro Surround has nothing on CMSS-3D Headphone (which, in turn, doesn't quite touch Aureal A3D).

    Also, I'm not really sold on this RGB LED meme that's been making its way through the PC industry as of late. Putting it on a sound card isn't going to change that.

    Headphone amp? Anyone serious about that gets a dedicated external amp anyway, and that goes double for electrostatics since they require specialized, high-voltage amplifiers.

    There's only two sound cards I know of with HDMI output: the Auzentech X-Fi HomeTheater HD, and the Xonar HDAV, which obviously isn't an X-Fi. Which is it?

    Alas, both are indeed limited to the old HDMI 1.3 standard.
     
    GotNoRice likes this.
  17. rtangwai

    rtangwai [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,195
    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2007
    I totally agree - that damn bright red-only LED on my Zr ruins the blue lighting of my setup.

    Everything else on my rig (GPU, RAM, fans, etc.) are blue lit or have multiple colours, but Creative *HAD* to go only red.

    The LED is so bright it actually shines a red spot thru my case window onto the floor, acting as a constant reminder to me how I screwed up the ambiance of my case.

    Been seriously thinking about cutting one of the leads of the red LED and wiring in a blue one - the LED circuit has no other function so as long as I put something in with the same voltage I should be fine (most blue LEDs require higher voltage but I found one that is reasonable). By cutting one lead only it would be easier to wire back in if I ever sell the card.
     
  18. Bandalo

    Bandalo 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,146
    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2010
    I clipped the LED on my old "Z", pulled the bright red EMI shield off and painted it blue. I liked the card, but it was a bit much in my mostly black/blue case.

    Since then I've tossed the card and got an external Soundblaster DAC/amp. Runs off USB, works great for music & games. The positional audio in games is better than the Z, IMO. And the drivers are far less intrusive.
     
  19. Stanley Pain

    Stanley Pain 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,251
    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2001
    Every time someone mentions A3D I shed a tear. I will never, EVER forget playing Half-Life w/ A3D enabled. That intro tram ride was nothing short of incredible. Scary how nothing in the last decade or two hasn't even come close to doing what A3D did.
     
    Ocellaris likes this.
  20. TypeO

    TypeO [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    6,266
    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2000
    I had a Z but thought it sounded terrible. Really wasn't fair as I was comparing it to my Schiit setup. I did compare it to my other rig with the STX in it and liked the STX much better.
     
  21. GotNoRice

    GotNoRice [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    9,969
    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2001
    It wasn't really "fair" because the Z is the worst card of the whole Z lineup, with the worst DAC. Really intended for those who wanted a gaming card but didn't really care what DAC the card had.

    Of course, that opens up a great possibility. I assume you are using the Schiit via USB? You could run digital output from your Z into your Schiit, make use of all features on the Z while making use of the DAC in the Schiit. No reason that digital from your Z would sound any worse than USB, and if you use Optical S/PDIF, there are actually reasons why it could sound better than USB.
     
  22. TypeO

    TypeO [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    6,266
    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2000
    I buy a lot of stuff just to see it/check it out. It was cheap so I thought I would try it. I sold it later on. I realized I simply had too much audio stuff and sold what I wasn't using. Yes, I'm going USB on the Gungnir into balanced monitors and then also into the Cavalli Liquid Carbon for headphones. I just need to stop. :) I do have eyes on some new headphones but not sure yet. Would like to hear a pair of Ethers.
     
  23. Tup3x

    Tup3x [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,580
    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2011
    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

     
    Last edited: Jun 16, 2017