Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LOL. They don't like any date they hear so they just pick one out of thin air.We have heard many suggestions about when Intel will launch its Core 2 Duo processors, but none of the suggested dates seemed to make sense to us. The only time frame that has been officially confirmed by Intel is when it expects to ship to its OEM customers.
pxc said:LOL. They don't like any date they hear so they just pick one out of thin air.![]()
chrisf6969 said:ATI & Nvidia's chipsets may need more time to mature.
But Intel's 975 has been available for months and only needed a VRM update.
Then I'm sure Intel's 965 has been in the works and tested for months already.
Plus Conroe is FSB/socket compatible with all of the other dual core/processor supporting chipsets. IE: 865, 875, 945, 955, 975 all they need is a VRM (board revision) and BIOS update to make them work. Who knows someone might even release a budget 865 motherboard that takes DDR/AGP for someone with an aging P4, but low budget.
The original first leaks of Conroe benchmarks over a month ago were on a Dell motherboard (with no overclocking options). So I'm sure Dell has had plenty of time to test out their designs.
They think just b/c they didn't get their hands on Conroe samples yet that noone else has.
$BangforThe$ said:Could be true ! I have heard from reliable sources in the forums that Conroe may not launch till Dec. Oh well.
Poncho this question is for you. I heard the new ATI chipset will do T1 . Well conroe run at T1???.
chrisf6969 said:Do you want to pass that crack pipe you're smoking!! LOL @ Dec.
I will bet you $75,000 that it launches SEVERAL MONTHS before Dec.
IE: July/Aug.
Ghent915 said:The problem is, there is a difference between LAUNCH, and AVAILABILITY.
The pricesheets list the chips as coming availible July 23.
HOWEVER, if Dell/Compaq/Gateway/Yo momma buy up every chip availible to use in their machines, we the DIY'ers get stuck having to wait until there are chips availible to be sold to us. Those companies Most Favored Buyer (or whatever it's called) status works against us.
Needless to say, we COULD get the short end of the stick, if Intel doesn't try and do right by us (make a huge surplus, release it to the big companies to let them go ahead and build their machines, then come July 23, release the chip for sale to us via the 'egg and ZZF).
Just MY $0.03 (adjusted for inflation).
-Ghent
chrisf6969 said:Yeah, but he was saying "not launched until Dec." - which I think he was smoking crack.
I'll admit that they MIGHT be in limited supply in the retail market for just the CPU's. I fully expect Dell, HP, etc will suck up a lot of the supply.
Unfortunately, us DIY'rs & OC'rs are a small portion of the overall market, and there could be a price premium initially b/c of short supply on the retail side.
edit: this post was already typed before I saw your "it was sarcasm".![]()
Oh, in that case.... "OMFG you newb, I heard AMD is going to totally pwn Intel b/c Core2 is going to be delayed until like Dec. 2008!! " LOL
Ghent915 said:The problem is, there is a difference between LAUNCH, and AVAILABILITY.
The pricesheets list the chips as coming availible July 23.
HOWEVER, if Dell/Compaq/Gateway/Yo momma buy up every chip availible to use in their machines, we the DIY'ers get stuck having to wait until there are chips availible to be sold to us. Those companies Most Favored Buyer (or whatever it's called) status works against us.
Needless to say, we COULD get the short end of the stick, if Intel doesn't try and do right by us (make a huge surplus, release it to the big companies to let them go ahead and build their machines, then come July 23, release the chip for sale to us via the 'egg and ZZF).
Just MY $0.03 (adjusted for inflation).
-Ghent
visaris said:I'm sure Conroe will make it's July 23rd launch date. The article even seems to confirm this date. The only thing that this article brings into question is what will happen on this date.
Is July 32rd going to be a "launch" for the Conroe like the AM2 launch with CPUs, systems, and MBs available from retailers on launch day? Or, is the July 23rd date the day that Intel will start shipping Conroe to OEMs and retailers? There is about a month difference between the two...
July 23rd isn't too far off, and if we don't receive news that Intel has started shipping Conroes in the next couple of weeks, I think it pretty much confirms that July 23rd is when Conroes will start shipping from Intel, and not the date when parts will be available to consumers.
chrisf6969 said:Yeah, but he was saying "not launched until Dec." - which I think he was smoking crack.
I'll admit that they MIGHT be in limited supply in the retail market for just the CPU's. I fully expect Dell, HP, etc will suck up a lot of the supply.
Unfortunately, us DIY'rs & OC'rs are a small portion of the overall market, and there could be a price premium initially b/c of short supply on the retail side.
edit: this post was already typed before I saw your "it was sarcasm".![]()
Oh, in that case.... "OMFG you newb, I heard AMD is going to totally pwn Intel b/c Core2 is going to be delayed until like Dec. 2008!! " LOL
lacklin said:The release date has always been and is July 23rd.
Donnie27 said:That's the problem though, these OEMs are getting shipments right now. Just like some of them had Woodcrest last month. DO you really think SGI just now figured out that they're going to drop Opteron and use Woodcrest in the last couple of days?
duby229 said:Then give us a link to prove it. I dont doubt you, but like others have said, I havent heard anything about Intel beginning shipments yet either.
The reason why I posted this link to begin with was becouse it brings up a valid question.
Intel To Ship Next MP Processor in 3Q
By Kristen Kenedy, CRN
7:03 PM EDT Fri. Jun. 09, 2006
Intel said Friday it will move up the ship date for Tulsa, its next CPU for multiprocessor servers, to the third quarter.
Donnie27 said:Breaking News
Dewd, I already gave links to the date of the price cuts and Paul Otellini saying Stock would be for sale on the announcement date.
Other links.
Legit Reviews
Intel Confirms Conroe Shipping at 2.93GHz For Launch
Late yesterday I was sent an e-mail from Intel letting us know that they have two Extreme Edition Conroe processors coming out this year. The first will be clocked at 2.93GHz and later it will be replaced by a 3.2GHz version. Intel says the Kentsfield is still on track for Q1'07, which is good news for all if Intel can keep that mark.
http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=31316
TG Daily
Sources previously indicated that especially Merom may see an October or possibly November launch. Conroe recently was also rumored to be slipping into October. Otellini indicated that Intel is gearing up for mass production of its Core architecture at this time; if Intel will be able to keep its Q3 promise, the company may be shipping Woodcrests, Conroes and Meroms for revenue as early as in June or July of this year.
Hexus
Woodcrest
Intel is getting set to release Woodcrest, a new server processor, on June 26, Skaugen announced Friday. Woodcrest will be a major boost to Intel's server division when it comes to performance, and Intel believes it will retake the lead in this new metric of performance per watt, he said. AMD, however, is unwilling to concede that point just yet, although its competitive marketing no longer cites the pure-performance benchmarks that have carried it through the last two years.
duby229 said:The only thing I see in those links you posted was speculation on the fact that Intel will start shipping in june or july, and that launch is expected in October. The links you provided are even worse then the one I provided.
Yraen said:Where it started is where it ends.
Conroe is not late after all.
Donnie27 said:Prepare to leap ahead in July.
savantu said:Owned .
I wonder if he has the balls to admit he was wrong.
Dubby , be a man and if Conroe launches and it is general available, performs as expected post a thread starting with " Guys I'm sorry for all my BS regarding Conroe ..."![]()
He won't have to because Conroe will not be available on launch day. Why don't you read the link you think "owned" dubby.savantu said:Dubby , be a man and if Conroe launches and it is general available, performs as expected post a thread starting with " Guys I'm sorry for all my BS regarding Conroe ..."![]()
Sorry guys, but if Conroe ships at the end of July, you will not see them until August.We were contacted by an Intel rep who told us, in no uncertain terms, that our story was wrong. Conroe is still on course to ship at the end of July.
visaris said:He won't have to because Conroe will not be available on launch day. Why don't you read the link you think "owned" dubby.
http://www.bit-tech.net/news/2006/06/10/conroe_not_late/
Sorry guys, but if Conroe ships at the end of July, you will not see them until August.
----
Standard disclaimer: I have no inside information and can only speculate based on the information in the linked article. If the article is wrong, so am I; don't flame me for what the article says.
How can directly quoting an article without changing a single word be considered "distorting information" or "pull[ing] stuff out of [my] bottom."? Simple answer: it can't.savantu said:Better shut up instead of distorting information : [. . .] Secondly you simply distort what the link says : Conroe ships in July = Conroe will be launched in July. [. . .] But as a blind man with an agenda you pull stuff out of your bottom.
I don't appreciate you insulting me for what someone else's article says. Your anger and flames are misplaced; you need to take a break and cool off. What is even more frustrating is that you decide to totally ignore the last part of my post and flame me anyways.visaris said:Standard disclaimer: I have no inside information and can only speculate based on the information in the linked article. If the article is wrong, so am I; don't flame me for what the article says.
visaris said:How can directly quoting an article without changing a single word be considered "distorting information" or "pull[ing] stuff out of [my] bottom."? Simple answer: it can't.
I didn't distort anything. I took a direct quote from an article and I didn't change a single word.
I don't appreciate you insulting me for what someone else's article says. Your anger and flames are misplaced; you need to take a break and cool off. What is even more frustrating is that you decide to totally ignore the last part of my post and flame me anyways.You know why you are in my sig, don't you?
savantu said:Owned .
I wonder if he has the balls to admit he was wrong.
Dubby , be a man and if Conroe launches and it is general available, performs as expected post a thread starting with " Guys I'm sorry for all my BS regarding Conroe ..."![]()
http://www.bit-tech.net/news/2006/06/10/conroe_not_late/savantu said:Huh ? What's with the: "Sorry guys, but if Conroe ships at the end of July, you will not see them until August."
If Conroe starts shipping from Intel's factory to OEMs and retailers on July 23rd, general availability of Conroe for consumers will not come about until August. This is not speculation, this is fact. This is based on simple laws of physics that state that is takes time to move something from one place to another. UPS, FedEx, and commercial shippers do not move at the speed of light.We were contacted by an Intel rep who told us, in no uncertain terms, that our story was wrong. Conroe is still on course to ship at the end of July.
Oh really? How about the following quote; It sounds pretty condescending and insulting to me:savantu said:Nobody is insulting you
----savantu said:Better shut up instead of distorting information : [. . .] Secondly you simply distort what the link says : Conroe ships in July = Conroe will be launched in July. [. . .] But as a blind man with an agenda you pull stuff out of your bottom. [. . .] I thought you're smarter than that.
I didn't bash Intel at all. I quoted an article, and then I stated a fact. Just because you don't like the fact doesn't mean I bashed Intel.savantu said:Just telling you to "hold your horses" with regard to the mindless bashing of Intel in Intel's Forum
That works for me.savantu said:As for you your sig , frankly , I couldn't care less.![]()