conroe reaches 4ghz

Status
Not open for further replies.
Leon2ky said:
4Ghz on Vapo, truley this helps the general public :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

but just imagine how big your e-penis will be after you have a 4ghz conroe.
 
Leon2ky said:
4Ghz on Vapo, truley this helps the general public :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

No, but Coolater's is doing 3.2 to 3.4GHz on air is :) To do better, that means the AMD chips will need Vapo to beat it LOL!
 
Jpitzo said:
but just imagine how big your e-penis will be after you have a 4ghz conroe.
Click to expand...


I'd imagine you'd have to walk around with it slung over an e-shopping cart ;)
 
Leon2ky said:
4Ghz on Vapo, truley this helps the general public :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

You are truly some sort of dunce. Benchmarks like this, vapo or not, give an indication of future performance of the chip.

I know it's cool with the youngsters to be cynical about everything these days, but your comments are meaningless.
 
I hate people who hate on benchmarkers. Go drink some bleach or play in traffic.
 
jvrobert said:
You are truly some sort of dunce. Benchmarks like this, vapo or not, give an indication of future performance of the chip.

I know it's cool with the youngsters to be cynical about everything these days, but your comments are meaningless.
Click to expand...


Just ignore that guy, hes prolly notin more than a friggin fan-----boy... :p
 
jvrobert said:
You are truly some sort of dunce. Benchmarks like this, vapo or not, give an indication of future performance of the chip.

I know it's cool with the youngsters to be cynical about everything these days, but your comments are meaningless.
Click to expand...

Right because the Pentium 4 can do 6Ghz-7Ghz on Vapo but it really shows its hardcore future performance :eek:

Also, Fugger had to disable a core to get it to do 4Ghz, which makes it worth NOTHING.
 
$BangforThe$ said:
I like this vapor ware it seems to run on a M/B much better than the K9 (K8L) vapor ware.
Click to expand...

K8L isn't Vaporware, it doesn't exactly exsist yet and it's not like anyone has ES model of it. Wanna talk about Vaporware, let's talk about this 5Ghz P4's Intel promised everyone.
 
Leon2ky said:
K8L isn't Vaporware, it doesn't exactly exsist yet and it's not like anyone has ES model of it. Wanna talk about Vaporware, let's talk about this 5Ghz P4's Intel promised everyone.
Click to expand...

Give these guys the new stepping and they will probably show you a Conroe running @ 5ghz.
 
$BangforThe$ said:
Did I just here a A K9 Fan-Boy running around here WooF WooF WoOf - Ar- ar -ar ar
Click to expand...
Cut the fan boy shit out okay? I'm sick of you intel guys giving people shit for having an AMD processor, then when intel shows something off you go "ZOMG THE END OF AMD!" SHUT THE HELL UP. Look at this in a practical POV for once!

#1. Pentium 4's can do 6Ghz (or at least 5Ghz easy) on Vapo
#2. How many people do you think actually CARE about that?
#3. 4Ghz for Conroe, big damn deal, Disabled core makes it not worth it.
#4. K9 was dropped, K8L is what's suppose to be the new series from AMD we know about it and we KNEW from the start it wouldn't show up till 2007.
#5. Don't give me shit just because I'm have an opinion and actually know what I'm talking about.
 
Leon2ky said:
Cut the fan boy shit out okay? I'm sick of you intel guys giving people shit for having an AMD processor, then when intel shows something off you go "ZOMG THE END OF AMD!" SHUT THE HELL UP. Look at this in a practical POV for once!

#1. Pentium 4's can do 6Ghz (or at least 5Ghz easy) on Vapo
#2. How many people do you think actually CARE about that?
#3. 4Ghz for Conroe, big damn deal, Disabled core makes it not worth it.
#4. K9 was dropped, K8L is what's suppose to be the new series from AMD we know about it and we KNEW from the start it wouldn't show up till 2007.
#5. Don't give me shit just because I'm have an opinion and actually know what I'm talking about.
Click to expand...


LOl, amd boi getting upset about conroe kicking ass, the truth hurts huh? :)
Also Conroes clock 3.4+ on air anyway, which is still extremly fast. It wont be long before 4 Ghz is reached with both cores running. If this was an AMD cpu all you !!!!!!s would be running around and celebrating as well...
And are you smoking dope? 4ghz single core conroe still kills most dual core cpus...so what do you mean by "not worth it". Seriously, stop trying to down talk the CPU just becuase its not amd...
 
I can't even get on the XS forums right now, I think it's me though, having problems with DNS or something like that.
 
cupholder2.0 said:
LOl, amd boi getting upset about conroe kicking ass, the truth hurts huh? :)
Also Conroes clock 3.4+ on air anyway, which is still extremly fast. It wont be long before 4 Ghz is reached with both cores running. If this was an AMD cpu all you !!!!!!s would be running around and celebrating as well...
And are you smoking dope? 4ghz single core conroe still kills most dual core cpus...
Click to expand...

You guys make me sick, you honestly do. What did I say? Cut the fan boy shit out, learn some damned manners won't you?

Where did I say Conroe wasn't supperior than anything AMD is pushing out ATM? Where, please someone point this out to me! 3.4Ghz, fantastic that makes more sense! 4Ghz single core, #1. Not Bench Stable, #2. SINGLE CORE, you don't pay an extra $100 for a dual core processor only to have 1 core functional. And FYI, by calling someone a fan boy (and btw I'M NOT) you instantly lose so many people's respect.
 
Leon2ky said:
Cut the fan boy shit out okay? I'm sick of you intel guys giving people shit for having an AMD processor, then when intel shows something off you go "ZOMG THE END OF AMD!" SHUT THE HELL UP. Look at this in a practical POV for once!

#1. Pentium 4's can do 6Ghz (or at least 5Ghz easy) on Vapo
#2. How many people do you think actually CARE about that?
#3. 4Ghz for Conroe, big damn deal, Disabled core makes it not worth it.
#4. K9 was dropped, K8L is what's suppose to be the new series from AMD we know about it and we KNEW from the start it wouldn't show up till 2007.
#5. Don't give me shit just because I'm have an opinion and actually know what I'm talking about.
Click to expand...

WHo cares about what Intel said . I only care what intel has done CONROE ra! ra! ra!

Were's K9 or K10 I looked every were can't find it . More BS from AMD.

This Conroe does great Benchmarks for vapor ware . I bet the real deal is even more terrifying.

When K9(K8L) comes out in 09 maybe it will offer a little competition not likely tho.
 
Well, I do agree it doesn't really count if you have to disable one core. I'd rather have a 3.33 dual core Conroe than a 4.0 single core.

Also - Intel could have probably very easily sold 5Ghz P4s, it's not too uncommon for P4 9xx CPUs to be able to hit 5Ghz on very good air, and very common with good water.
 
tys90 said:
I can't even get on the XS forums right now, I think it's me though, having problems with DNS or something like that.
Click to expand...

No its not just you . They are getting bombarded with hits.
 
$BangforThe$ said:
How cares about what Intel said . I only care what intel has done CONROE ra! ra! ra!

Were's K9 or K10 I looked every were can't find it . More BS from AMD.

This Conroe does great Benchmarks for vapor ware . I bet the real deal is even more terrifying.

When K9(K8L) comes out in 09 maybe it will offer a little competition not likely tho.
Click to expand...

Listen up fan boy.

- K9 was never promised to anyone
- K8L is suppose to premier Q1-2 2007, and I don't recall anyone saying any different.
- You'd be absolutely retarded to think that AMD is sitting idly by while Intel tries to make this come back.
- Conroe isn't vapoware, it's obviously coming out soon
- K8L isn't vaporware, it isn't anything yet all we know is what we're told and really no one's saying it'll beat anything.
- If you think K8L won't at least be on par with Conroe, you must not have any idea how businesses work.
- Intel has promised more than AMD has, infact I don't recall AMD breaking any of their promises.
 
Leon2ky said:
Cut the fan boy shit out okay? I'm sick of you intel guys giving people shit for having an AMD processor, then when intel shows something off you go "ZOMG THE END OF AMD!" SHUT THE HELL UP. Look at this in a practical POV for once!

#1. Pentium 4's can do 6Ghz (or at least 5Ghz easy) on Vapo
#2. How many people do you think actually CARE about that?
#3. 4Ghz for Conroe, big damn deal, Disabled core makes it not worth it.
#4. K9 was dropped, K8L is what's suppose to be the new series from AMD we know about it and we KNEW from the start it wouldn't show up till 2007.
#5. Don't give me shit just because I'm have an opinion and actually know what I'm talking about.
Click to expand...

So what exactly is there about the first three out your five points that doesn't make you sound like typical AMD f-a-n-b-o-y...??? :rolleyes:
It's all about the benches. Just to remind you, all WR PI results prior to Conroe, were held by AMD CPU's on Vapo, LN, or DI. Sure their pointless, but never the less entertaining. Every non-f-a-n-b-o-y with the craving for best performance and a little extra cash WILL switch to Conroe in the coming weeks. Later on, when K8L comes out, and if it offers 20~30% improvement over Conroe, I'm sure they'll switch to AMD. It's just the way it goes.
So put your pants back on, and look at your own comment before calling others f-a-n-b-o-y-s.... :cool:

Mike
 
Leon2ky said:
Cut the fan boy shit out okay? I'm sick of you intel guys giving people shit for having an AMD processor, then when intel shows something off you go "ZOMG THE END OF AMD!" SHUT THE HELL UP. Look at this in a practical POV for once!

#1. Pentium 4's can do 6Ghz (or at least 5Ghz easy) on Vapo
#2. How many people do you think actually CARE about that?
#3. 4Ghz for Conroe, big damn deal, Disabled core makes it not worth it.
#4. K9 was dropped, K8L is what's suppose to be the new series from AMD we know about it and we KNEW from the start it wouldn't show up till 2007.
#5. Don't give me shit just because I'm have an opinion and actually know what I'm talking about.
Click to expand...

And you AMD fan-boys have been so kind over the last 3 years LOL LOL
 
mzs_biteme said:
So what exactly is there about the first three out your five points that doesn't make you sound like typical AMD f-a-n-b-o-y...??? :rolleyes:
It's all about the benches. Just to remind you, all WR PI results prior to Conroe, were held by AMD CPU's on Vapo, LN, or DI. Sure their pointless, but never the less entertaining. Every non-f-a-n-b-o-y with the craving for best performance and a little extra cash WILL switch to Conroe in the coming weeks. Later on, when K8L comes out, and if it offers 20~30% improvement over Conroe, I'm sure they'll switch to AMD. It's just the way it goes.
So put your pants back on, and look at your own comment before calling others f-a-n-b-o-y-s.... :cool:

Mike
Click to expand...
You guys started taking shots first, don't give me that "oh well you said this and that" crap, I'm stating the obvious. 4Ghz Conroe means really shit to anyone else, I don't care about PI world records, I want something that works for EVERYTHING even if I'm not going to do it, which BTW Conroe has been shown to fall back behind AMD in particular activities and on the server end, that really matters.

Which btw, I've never agreed with anyone calling anyone a fan boy, I think the whole fan boy non-sense is retarded just like the people who throw shit without even thinking.
 
Leon2ky said:
Listen up fan boy.

- K9 was never promised to anyone
- K8L is suppose to premier Q1-2 2007, and I don't recall anyone saying any different.
- You'd be absolutely retarded to think that AMD is sitting idly by while Intel tries to make this come back.
- Conroe isn't vapoware, it's obviously coming out soon
- K8L isn't vaporware, it isn't anything yet all we know is what we're told and really no one's saying it'll beat anything.
- If you think K8L won't at least be on par with Conroe, you must not have any idea how businesses work.
- Intel has promised more than AMD has, infact I don't recall AMD breaking any of their promises.
Click to expand...

I hate to bust your bubble but there isn't a real Santa Claws. AMD will be lucky to get K8 65nm out by 2nd qt of 07. Let alone K9(K8L)
 
$BangforThe$ said:
I hate to bust your bubble but there isn't a real Santa Claws. AMD will be lucky to get K8 65nm out by 2nd qt of 07. Let alone K9(K8L)
Click to expand...
Who are you to make that call? What you suddenly held under NDA and can't tell people "Guess what AMD's falling behind". AMD said 65nm would be around by Mid-Late 2006, they aren't Intel they don't have 1/2 the amount of development staff or overall resources to dedicate. You don't need to be calling people fan boys just because they know what they're talking about.

$BangforThe$ said:
Who fired the first shots.
Click to expand...

Once again, stating the obvious, just because I said that doesn't make me a fan boy, I actually congratulated the guy at XS who got the 7.2Ghz WR, but it still wasn't practical, and getting 4Ghz on an ES Chip? Still, not practical you're missing my entire argument.

Done with this topic before I get myself in actual trouble, for anyone who's a subscriber please refer to this thread: http://www.hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=1057284
 
You state AMD wont sit idle on the side while Intel takes the lead - sure, they are developing something, but to claim it will be on par with intel - sorry, where is this "fact" coming from?

Intel didnt sit on the side lines while AMD was ahead, they tried making new chips to beat it and simply failed

AMD could end up in the very same boat - trying to develop something new - doesnt mean they will do it righ the first time....

Your comments do seem to strongly support AMD more so then showing praise towards intel.

"Claiming" that AMD will have a comparible CPU and they are not sitting idle.
That 4GHZ means nothing - sure, maybe not to you, but obviously to some people, as stated above - if someone is into benchmarking - a single core 4ghz is something to go for.



It is true an ES chip, but at least it is provding some idea of how fast these chips will go, considering the lowest end will start @ 1.66ghz? I would love to know how high those could clock to.
 
LOL Dumba$$ !!!!!!. I don't think you realize how far behind AMD is compared to Intel. Gl hf with 65nm, cause Intel will be on 45nm by the time AMD gets there. 1 core that can process 1 mb pi in <14 seconds still beats the shit out of a PD 955XE at 7ghz, and any FX series processor (what was the record for AMD Pi? like 20 seconds?). SIngle core still makes it worth it, 4mb cache is more than enough for one core. Go jack off to your Semperon and leave us alone.
 
StealthyFish said:
LOL Dumba$$ !!!!!!. I don't think you realize how far behind AMD is compared to Intel. Gl hf with 65nm, cause Intel will be on 45nm by the time AMD gets there. 1 core that can process 1 mb pi in <14 seconds still beats the shit out of a PD 955XE at 7ghz, and any FX series processor (what was the record for AMD Pi? like 20 seconds?). SIngle core still makes it worth it, 4mb cache is more than enough for one core. Go jack off to your Semperon and leave us alone.
Click to expand...

You are a prime example of what happens when stupid people are allowed rights.

A Friend said:
intel fans are like slaves, after being beaten so badly the past three years and finally having a bit of freedom they're going to lash out at their oppressors as long as they possibly can.
Click to expand...
 
bah...screw the partisanship. any way you slice it, Conroe is going to be an overclocking beast, and one hell of a gamer.
 
there's going to be a mod in here cleaning up the mess soon! :eek:

4Ghz on single core is still interesting b/c they are going to release a single cpu Celeron based off this core. So disabling a core would be interesting, to maybe give an idea, though I'm sure Intel will castrate 3/4 of the cache to make sure it doesn't compete too well.

And single core performance is important to gaming, look at the gaming benchmarks, an FX-57 beats an FX-60 in many games. At least it did until ATI & Nvidia added some dual core tweaks to their drivers.
 
Leon2ky said:
Who are you to make that call? What you suddenly held under NDA and can't tell people "Guess what AMD's falling behind". AMD said 65nm would be around by Mid-Late 2006, they aren't Intel they don't have 1/2 the amount of development staff or overall resources to dedicate. You don't need to be calling people fan boys just because they know what they're talking about.



Once again, stating the obvious, just because I said that doesn't make me a fan boy, I actually congratulated the guy at XS who got the 7.2Ghz WR, but it still wasn't practical, and getting 4Ghz on an ES Chip? Still, not practical you're missing my entire argument.

Done with this topic before I get myself in actual trouble, for anyone who's a subscriber please refer to this thread: http://www.hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=1057284
Click to expand...


Wow, I could be described as an AMD fan, but just wow, being a fan doesn't mean you should be blindly ignorant. I'm likely to switch to a Conroe soon from my X2 3800+ @ 2.5ghz in a Q-Pack if I can, what is stupid is not believing the truth and lashing out at those who are just reporting facts and stating THEIR opinions.
 
lol it's taken intel a few years to create something about 20% faster per clock. Unless AMD's R&D has been sitting on their asses eating twinkies all this time, I'm sure they have something in development too.

All I can say for the intel loud mouth, is it's about time they produced something not fit for a paperweight, but we'll see how long before AMD responds.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top