As we all know this will be the first CoD game not to come to PC. But are we really missing out? Including the MoH series, which is about the same thing, we've had nearly ten of these games, all covering almost the same thing. Frankly the first few were fun, but after so many games, the non-realistic shoot-em up WWII fps game doesn't really impress me anymore. BIA 3 might be good as it look like they're trying to take the realism tack, but that's beside the point.
First, we can be relatively certain that CoD 3 will be just like the last million games in it's niche genre, with the possibility of a clumsy gimmick to mix things up. On the other hand, one obvious, possible redemption for this game could have been amazing cinematic graphics. Unfortunately these seem pretty week. As one call tell from these http://games.bytesector.com/xbox360/fps/cod3/previews/preview115.php screens, the game looks almost a step back for CoD II, and I'd hardly be surprised to learn that it was running on the Quake 3 engine. The textures are horrid, the normal mapping looks like plastic, and it just looks unimpressive. What happend to the power of the 360? Why does this look worse than COD2? I think this game's gonna flop. Anyone else?
First, we can be relatively certain that CoD 3 will be just like the last million games in it's niche genre, with the possibility of a clumsy gimmick to mix things up. On the other hand, one obvious, possible redemption for this game could have been amazing cinematic graphics. Unfortunately these seem pretty week. As one call tell from these http://games.bytesector.com/xbox360/fps/cod3/previews/preview115.php screens, the game looks almost a step back for CoD II, and I'd hardly be surprised to learn that it was running on the Quake 3 engine. The textures are horrid, the normal mapping looks like plastic, and it just looks unimpressive. What happend to the power of the 360? Why does this look worse than COD2? I think this game's gonna flop. Anyone else?