big beta 8103

None here. I believe they may be vapor-ware WUs.
But then again I'm not a beta user either.

Edit: Belay that. I see via HFM where that was just added. Still no results however.
 
I found this to be very interesting and informative...

by kasson » Thu Feb 14, 2013 1:27 pm

We're releasing a new bigWU project to beta, 8103. This is essentially a clone of 8102 (based on what we're seeing in 8102, we've identified some more conditions to explore) and thus has identical points & deadlines.

The projects in our 810X series have to do with how influenza virus gets into cells. This is something we do a lot of work on, both because influenza is an important disease and because the process of cell entry by influenza virus is a model to study other viruses as well as things like nerve impulse transmission. Thus the most direct applications are to infectious disease, but we hope to address diseases such as Alzheimer's (where some of the drugs specifically target certain kinds of nerve impulse transmission). There has been a lot of exciting experimental work in this field to come out recently, and our experimental colleagues are encouraging us to do more simulations. Unfortunately, the simulations take time (and we need a lot of simulations). That's where you come in...thanks to the consistent help of bigWU donors over time, we are starting to see some interesting results. We're following those up and hope they pan out.

Thanks for testing!
Click to expand...
 
About this post in the beta-forum-section in the FoldingForum I asked my question!


But - who has configured his bigadv-client to "beta" ??? ;)
 
All of mine are running -bigbeta and have been for the duration, and I have not seen an 8103 yet.
 
DAMN IT! Quit posting if you don't have one! I get so excited to see the results, then keep getting let down...:p
 
Post

(That's for you musky :))

Haven't seen one either on my two bigbeta rigs.
 
Hey! I was able to capture Bigfoot and a Chupacabra, yet I can't get me a 8103. :p
 
How does the 10:31 TPF compare to 8102/8101 on that rig?
And have you updated WU list on HFM?
 
This is the first one, and TPF is the same as for 8102 as I can recall!

Edit: I checked to Benchmark Clients (HFM.NET) and this came up, so something better with 8102.

Name: G34 Opteron 6272 2.4GHz 675Watt
Path: T:\
Number of Frames Observed: 300

Min. Time / Frame : 00:10:04 - 543 855,5 PPD
Avg. Time / Frame : 00:10:16 - 528 041,0 PPD
 
I have just received one as well on my OC'd 6166HE rig.
And yes the PPD/TPF is very similar to 8102.
If you update the WU list from Stanford it will show properly for 8103. Mine does.
 
Nice to see good ppd from new units. Now I just need to get some.

I wonder if *ahem* I can find a way to get a streak of these going.
 
I just got one as well - looking at 11 minutes and change on 4x 6172 for ~450k ppd.
 
Wow...... wow. I found a quadracorn :D On the 6180SE rig, 10:15 TPF for about 530K.
 
16,5 minutes TFP on dual [email protected] GHz after 44% complete, around 260k PPD expected. In short, roughly same as 8102's...

Which run of the project are your folding guys ?

Mine is Run 1, I think I saw some Run 0 also on some HFM.net screen caps ?

Since all the - very few - 8102's I folded were labelled Run 0, I was wondering if more Run -> more WUs than 8102's -> more PPD goodness ? ;)
 
Core32 said:
Dude!
You need to OC those chips. I'm getting TPF of 9:51 now with the 6166HE rig. :eek:
Click to expand...

Code: 
[root@ancalagon /]# clockspeed 
Running, please wait...
Refclock: 222.014 MHz
Clockspeed: 2775.181 MHz

It is a Gi board and the 6180SE chips do not like it compared to the GL board they where in.
 
402blownstroker said:
It is a Gi board and the 6180SE chips do not like it compared to the GL board they where in.
Click to expand...

Hmmm. Even so that clock makes my 6166 number look like a lie. :eek:
I'll check it again tonight to see if I read it wrong.
Is it folding only?
 
402blownstroker said:
Code: 
[root@ancalagon /]# clockspeed 
Running, please wait...
Refclock: 222.014 MHz
Clockspeed: 2775.181 MHz

It is a Gi board and the 6180SE chips do not like it compared to the GL board they where in.
Click to expand...



That was what my 6180SE chips would do on my Gi board before the power problem
 
I'm seeing quite a few of these 8301's now - processing 4 of them currently.

I like these things - just got one on one of my 4P's and qd reports: 530247.56 ppd
 
Last edited:
My Sr2 just got one too.

our team's ppd should show a nice bump
 
Nicolas_orleans said:
Which run of the project are your folding guys ?

Mine is Run 1, I think I saw some Run 0 also on some HFM.net screen caps ?

Since all the - very few - 8102's I folded were labelled Run 0, I was wondering if more Run -> more WUs than 8102's -> more PPD goodness ? ;)
Click to expand...

Thanks guys for the data, it's confirmed Runs 0 and 1 are available for 8103. Any of you could confirm whether 8102 was Run 0 only ?
 
Just got one of 8103 on my 4p (3x6172 + 1x6128) with total of 40 cores in use.
TPF right now with 38% done is 12 min 35sec . Downloaded new projects from Stanford for HFM but still no data yet.

Some info:

Code: 
Project ID: 8103
 Core: GRO-A5
 Credit: 22607
 Frames: 100


 Name: SM6172_3
 Path: \\x.x.x.x\fah\
 Number of Frames Observed: 49

 Min. Time / Frame : 00:12:01 - 416,999.9 PPD
 Avg. Time / Frame : 00:12:25 - 397,012.7 PPD
 Cur. Time / Frame : 00:12:36 - 388,783.3 PPD
 R3F. Time / Frame : 00:12:33 - 390,728.7 PPD
 All  Time / Frame : 00:12:25 - 395,998.8 PPD
 Eff. Time / Frame : 00:12:32 - 391,380.8 PPD
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top