- Joined
- Jun 27, 2001
- Messages
- 15,814
I think EA is trying to pull a SONY hehe... anyway, i have always hated EA and think they have ruined huge chunks of the gaming industry and killed some really great titles... oh well...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Robot Saviour said:EA needs to accept full money returns on open copies. Not adding this information to the outside of the packaging is just asking for a lawsuit.
Just because other companies may use it doesn't mean its acceptable. That's like saying murder is OK because other people do it.Gimme Yo Shoes said:Its also in Swat4 (patch 1.1) and plenty of other titles so I guess EA is the worst developer out there and we should boycott all of Massive's partners?
RadCliffeX said:This would be the reason i stopped buying EA games Two BF's ago
bring it back, demand your money in return.Deadpool2k said:The point is this revelation is revealed after the fact you have BOUGHT IT! Sure been nice to know beforehand.
a couple of weeks ago i posted a thread about this topic (massive in-game advertising network), hence I am not surprised.The King of Pants said:Ha! last time I posted on this topic, people came out of the woodwork to tell me i was paranoid and that publishers would never impliment in game ads that were so invasive they'd drive away even the most hardcore fan.
I. Told. You. So.
WhyYouLoveMe said:This is the 1st BF game to have in-game ads. Find another reason.
Was it the shoddy, rushed coding that makes titan mode virtually unplayable when the titans are moving? Or how about the little breakdance mech's do when they're feelin' funkay? Tell me, what's their excuse for releasing a game in this condition? Far better publishers like Activision simply delay their games when they're not ready, instead of rushing them out for maximum profit. See: Enemy Territory: Quake Wars.
Was it the ridiculous concept of in-game advertising, when we have already payed $50 for the game? Keep in mind, EA has given no indication whatsoever that the extra money they generate from placing ads in the maps will go toward improving the game in any way. Past ethics of this company surely indicate every cent will go towards lining the pockets of fat, bald, rich white suits. Isn't EA rich enough? Do they really need the extra income?
Our how about the revelation that Battlefield 2142 comes packaged with spyware? Let's turn to www.dictionary.com to figure out exactly what spyware is:
any software that covertly gathers information about a user while he/she navigates the Internet and transmits the information to an individual or company that uses it for marketing or other purposes
Is it software? Check.
Is it covert? They didn't even plan on telling you until after they had your $50. Check.
Is it gathering information while we use the internet? Check.
Is it transmitting that information to a company for marketing purposes? Check.
And I haven't even gotten to my favorite part yet. You'll notice at the bottom of that lovely piece of paper they insert into the game box (and I needn't remind you, there's no indication of anything written on that piece of paper anywhere before you buy the game), there's a sentence that reads the following, written in capital letters:
IF YOU DO NOT WANT IGA TO COLLECT, USE, STORE OR TRANSMIT THE DATA DESCRIBED IN THIS SECTION, DO NOT INSTALL OR PLAY ON ANY SOFTWARE THAT IS USED TO CONNECT TO THE INTERNET.
Has it sunk in yet?
EA is insulting you.
EA requests that you simply not use their product in the way it was most certainly intended to use if you don't like the spyware (yes, spyware) they place on your PC without warning prior to buying the game.
But they thank you for your $50.
I mean, certainly playing the game offline against computer-controlled AI will provide an experience worth paying $50 for, right? It's the same experience that you were expecting before, except it doesn't use bandwidth!
Absolutely insulting.
zetachi said:LMAO now so many people will complain that EA will patch the game to take out the ads and that will srew the game up more then it probably already is... so then the put a=out a patch to patch the patch and......well next year they come out with BF 3000 and soak everyone for $50 more .
zetachi said:so let me get this straight. You design a game that takes place in 2142.. and you throw in ads from 2006.
I think you greatly overestimate your power. Millions of sheep are going to run out and buy the next BF game, 'cause it's so awesome, d00d3....Riddlinkidstoner said:Yeah I still can't believe this crap, several threads later from several other forums. They underestimate the playerbase that reads forums and how many people will not buy their product, especially on the EA forums themselves.
drizzt81 said:I think you greatly overestimate your power. Millions of sheep are going to run out and buy the next BF game, 'cause it's so awesome, d00d3....
Seriously, I can guarantee you that this game will be a 'smash hit' or whatever they call it these days.
Standpoint said:What if you only surf the net for Porn?
Would I have naked chicks on billboards in the game?
Satyrist said:Here is a thread that discusses possible methods of blocking said adware.
http://www.totalbf2142.com/forums/showthread.php?t=4490
Riddlinkidstoner said:Dunno, for all we know patch 1.4 had some spyware in it
dotK said:I would be all in favor of the ads if they only played on EA sponsored servers and was EA's way of paying for the servers or the game was free (or like $10).
I'd probably say it would be OK if EA put out A LOT of new content on a regular basis to justify looking at them, lots of new maps, some new guns, and some new vehicles.
Booby McNipples said:Crap. I was planning on buying it too but not anymore. I know it doesn't really matter in the whole scheme of things but hey, that's 50 bucks less for the cheating bastards.
I'll tell you one thing I can do though, and that's to let my un-informed friends know about this and I can guarantee they won't be buying it either.
I'm really bummed now. I totally love this series.
[FX]Roman said:Who cares... If you are angry about paying for something that shows you ads, then you must have never been to a movie theater.
... Unless you were able to suck it up then... Why not now?
... Overlooking all the other points.
this is what i would like for in game adverstising. make it real.swatbat said:Maybe. The only time I really wouldn't mind ads in a game was if it added to the game. They could add in like billboards in a game like splinter cell or maybe posters for movies or whatever in subways in the game. Something like that makes sence. Maybe have like real stores in a GTA type game(ie you eat at BugerKing in a GTA game to get your health back). Or maybe Ford pays rockstar to put the ford gt in the game as like the fastest car(make it the high end sports car) if the time period is right.
As far as the spyware goes(and I consider it spyware) this is out of the question. I don't install free programs that come with software that does this. There is no way I'm going to pay something for the right to use it.
QuimZ said:I've never had a problem returning or exchanging pretty much anything, you just have to get fuckin evil on them if they don't give you the time of day.