chaikovski2002
2[H]4U
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2003
- Messages
- 2,276
What is the best cutoff frequency for logitech Z-680's on audigy2zs to hear that awesome oomph?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
OCZSpeedJunky said:I typically always put my subs with the "port", if it;s ported, or the "driver" in a sealed unit, facing a corner. With the corner setup, every wall surface the low frequencies reflect off of will add generally +3 decibals of sound. This usually increases the entire bass frequency, not just the higher end, but all of it. And raising the speaker off the floor will actually "tighten" the sound of the unit, but won't do much as far as the volume is concerned. As far as an actual "cutoff" frequncy, most systems with sat's are designed so the sub will handle anything from 80hz on down, so typically you want to set the sub between 40 to 80 hz. From 50 to 80 hz range, you will get alot more bass guitar, etc. blended in with the bass, I personally, set mine at 40 - 42hz to limit some of the over bearing bass guitar some audio recordings have. Only problem with this is that by setting it at say 42hz, that means all sound from 43hz to 80 hz is almost missing, as most sat's produce sound from 80hz on up too 20K hz. Try starting your cutoff frequency at 80hz, then bring it down till you find a happy medium that you like. I find that setting my sub at 42hz, I get good "ooomph" without a ton of muddy bass guitar. Try that and go from there. Also, make sure to use an EQ, this will help greatly for your lowend.
Incase I missed it, what are you using for a soundcard?? Wondering as some come with EQ's, and some don't. LMK and I'll check back later.
OCZ
I'm having trouble with this statement. Firstly, any reflection of a sound wave results in a loss of intensity (especially high frequencies) due to absorption of the surface (refer to absorption coefficients). I believe that a three decibel increase would entail that each surface becomes a 100% efficient transducer, which can never be the case. The sum of the room's resonances may add harmonic content, raising overall SPL at the listening position by some small degree (psychoacoustically reinforcing the fundamental), but each reflective surface certainly cannot reinforce the fundamental (harmonically or otherwise) by 3dB! By this logic, a room with four walls would reinforce low frequencies by 12dB, which is more than double the original loudness!OCZSpeedJunky said:With the corner setup, every wall surface the low frequencies reflect off of will add generally +3 decibals of sound.
phide said:I'm having trouble with this statement. Firstly, any reflection of a sound wave results in a loss of intensity (especially high frequencies) due to absorption of the surface (refer to absorption coefficients). I believe that a three decibel increase would entail that each surface becomes a 100% efficient transducer, which can never be the case. The sum of the room's resonances may add harmonic content, raising overall SPL at the listening position by some small degree (psychoacoustically reinforcing the fundamental), but each reflective surface certainly cannot reinforce the fundamental (harmonically or otherwise) by 3dB! By this logic, a room with four walls would reinforce low frequencies by 12dB, which is more than double the original loudness!
120Hz is the typical reference crossover point and is recommended. A good subwoofer will be neither boomy nor overpowering at this crossover point.
phide said:Shoot 'em over. Always interested in a bit of audio readins'.
It just seems that 3dB would be a highly exaggerated, attypical figure. The length of low frequency wavelengths wouldn't explain how propogation of the fundamental would be reinforced by such a large margin by a wall of studs of sheetrock. Even factoring in the contribution of the walls in the tramsmission of acoustical energy (in which low frequency waveforms tend to contribute a great deal), 3dB seems massive. Psychoacoustically, I could see a large increase due to whole-octave and sub-octave harmonics reinforcing the fundamental.
But, like I said, throw up some links or what have you to the literature and I'll read through them, for I am never one to turn down an education.
ironforge said:Here is the quick version.
Move the sub around until you find where it sounds "loudest". Then play some music, etc and just adjust the crossover until it sounds good. I wouldn't break out the calculus book for what you are trying to do.
texuspete00 said:Alright dude. Claps to you already!
Honestly though thanks for the links.![]()
Omegaslast said:well it doesnt matter anyways because the Z680s crossover CANNOT BE SET LOWER than 120hz
phide said:http://img224.imageshack.us/img224/3499/cutoffjk0.jpg
Point is leave it at 120. Don't put it any higher than 120, and if you put it any lower then you will be lacking sound. Just get better speakers if you want something other than a 120 Hz crossover.mdameron said:Dude, tweak it all you want in that little Creative console... the crossover is physically set up not to go below 120hz on the actual amp. Amp crossover is higher in the chain of command than the signal sent to it. Whatever the signal, it's not going below 120... you CAN make it cut off HIGHER than 120.
mdameron said:Dude, tweak it all you want in that little Creative console... the crossover is physically set up not to go below 120hz on the actual amp. Amp crossover is higher in the chain of command than the signal sent to it. Whatever the signal, it's not going below 120... you CAN make it cut off HIGHER than 120.
Please. Consider the audio chain, consider the fact that I've used the Logitech Z-680s along with an Audigy 2ZS previously, and then reconsider your opinions of me.Omegaslast said:phide isnt the OP, hes just someone that doesnt know what "built in crossover" means when it comes to subwoofers..
phide said:Please. Consider the audio chain, consider the fact that I've used the Logitech Z-680s along with an Audigy 2ZS previously, and then reconsider your opinions of me.
There is a hint I can give you, as you may find it necessary: the crossover acts on the input.
OCZSpeedJunky said:You may want to rethink this post. My sub has a built in Active 200hz crossover, and yes, using software, I have the cutoff set much lower than that. I can see exactly how you are looking at this, so you may want to think about your comment, and possibly do a bit more reading. Just some advice. Also, whether the system has an active or passive crossover will make a difference.
OCZ
Fryguy8 said:If you have a 200hz lowpass crossover, and you set a 100hz lowpass crossover, except for some minimally effected frequency response differences in the 200+ range, you have the same thing as a 100hz crossover.
It's not "bypassing" the crossover.
Chernobyl1 said:You are feeding discrete channels to the amplifier, the amplifier doesnt mix the channels together (unless you are using a pseudo surround mode), it amplifies the signals and sends them to the speakers.
The crossover for the Z680's sub will reject frequencies above its cutoff (120Hz in this case).
The satellites wont respond (at volume) to frequencies below the cones lowest operating frequency which is likely to be somewhere around 100Hz. They may also have a high pass filter to prevent frequencies below around 120Hz getting to the cones. Either way, the effect is the same.
You wont know exactly what they will respond to until you test them.
If you set the Audigy crossover so the sub gets 100Hz and below , the satellites will need to be able to respond to frequencies from 100Hz up or there will be a hole in the sound.
Try and see what sound you prefer.
phide said:One thing to keep in mind when you're discussing cutoffs is that they aren't brick walls. In fact, "cutoff" is a bit of a misnomer, because what is actually occuring is "rolloff" (in our case, a high pass filter). The typical rolloff is second order, which means that rolloff is 12dB per octave, unless it's adjustable. So, with the filter set at 120Hz, 120Hz will be -3dB, 240Hz will be -15dB and 480Hz will be -27dB. -3dB at 120Hz is important, as the summing of two signals at identical voltages will cause a signal gain of 3dB. So, there are no hard "gaps" in the output, only bands of varying amplitude.
I would peg the Z-680 satellites at somewhere around 85-90Hz at -3dB, which isn't horrid. I still wouldn't advise that anyone actually dick around with the bass cutoff in the drivers, but it can be done, with varying degrees of results.
Omegaslast said:i understand gaps in sound, and im willing to bet the z680s satellites dont quite reach down to 100hz without dropping off an outrageous amount of decibels...
but lets say they reached well down to 80hz or something
you set the crossover on the audigy 2 to 100hz, im pretty sure that high pass filter will not *allow* the 100hz-120hz to even go to the satellites, so you basically have that entire range missing.
which brings up the point, sure you can send 100hz and below signals to the sub and "bypass" the built in crossover, but you still arent covering 100-120hz, which means you gotta leave it at 120hz anyways.