Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
New trailer showing off destruction: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XbAl5NIFRGQ
Today's great news:
-No in-game VOIP
-One character name per account/game
-No Battlerecorder for competitions
-They are "trying" to provide full joystick support
-You can only create squads in Battlelog, in game you can basically only switch squads.. but talking amongst the new squad probably won't have VOIP.
Can't find that anywhere on the blog. Mind linking?
Well now, things have gone from bad to worst and it looks like we are in for a BFBC2 repeat. I bought after playing the beta BFBC2 and regretted it, cancelled my preorder after playing the beta for MoH (2010), afterward bought it for discount and found that it was still bad and now the BF3 beta has come and gone. While showing promise it was buggy enough to kill enjoyment, the lag on Caspian alone made me sick (like motion sick) and now this interview. Starting to feel like I should cancel my preorder until they have the game fixed 3-4 months down the line and then buy it at a discount like they did for BFBC2.
In the end, everyone who has played a Battlefield game from the release date knows it takes DICE a couple months at least to polish up all the issues. Its been that way for almost the entire series and I doubt it will be any different with BF3.
So? Does that make it OK or acceptable?
Pathetic excuse.
Today's great news:
-No in-game VOIP
-One character name per account/game
-No Battlerecorder for competitions
-They are "trying" to provide full joystick support
-You can only create squads in Battlelog, in game you can basically only switch squads.. but talking amongst the new squad probably won't have VOIP.
http://pc.gamespy.com/pc/battlefield-3/1199753p1.html
Pretty much everything Dethred said is true.
AND on top of it, now commo rose might not make it in for launch even though K.M. Troedsson said it would.
It is about expectations.
BF games have not historically had smooth launches. Yet if you had a favorable impression of the previous games, it doesn't make sense to dismiss BF3 for potentially having the same issues.
If on the other hand you did hate the previous games, than I'm not sure why you would be interested in BF3 in the first place.
It also depends when they started playing BF2 also.
If they didn't start playing BF2 day one, then it's expected for them not to play BF3 day one.
Some people are just optimistically cautious and others are confident in DICE will deliver.
Just because they say it not a day one purchase, doesn't mean BF3 is lesser to them. They wasn't going to buy day one anyway, no matter how good the game is.
Could be a money issue or they aren't comfortable with buying a product with flaws.
They'll all come around when the game is $25, and would perceive themselves as geniuses for waiting until all the bugs were fixed.
The day one buyers would have already logged 200+ hours and unlocked everything, so be ready to spoil their experience when they do arrive.
http://pc.gamespy.com/pc/battlefield-3/1199753p1.html
Pretty much everything Dethred said is true.
AND on top of it, now commo rose might not make it in for launch even though K.M. Troedsson said it would.
If you want to avoid early problems and wait for a game to mature, I think that is a fair and valid approach, and the individuals choice.
But it seems to me some people may actually be more along the lines of completely dismissing the game based on a potential buggy release. Yet if you liked the previous BF games despite this and still gave them a try, it doesn't seem to make much sense to me to outright dismiss BF3 for that reason.
For instance BC2 might be the "smoother" experience when BF3 is launched, but BC2 did not arrive that way. Expecting BF3 to end up being a much worse game because of this would be highly pessimistic given past history.
On a side note, what would be funny though is if their back end gets overloaded early on, and people start complaining that an in game browser would magically solve this issue somehow. Because in game browsers are of course immune to these issues![]()
Come on GS, this is DICE we're talking about.GameSpy: When Bad Company 2 came out there were lots of issues with the server browser for the first few days. Do you think your beta testing will ensure that everything will work well on Day 1? Are you confident of a perfect launch?
No, everything he said is most certainly not true.
There's a big difference between features that are completely missing/broken and ones that may simply not be there at launch, which he conveniently didn't mention.
I said PRETTY MUCH everything, and uhhhh, yes, it is.
When I play the game on October 25th there will be:
-No in-game VOIP
-No battlerecorder
-One soldier per account
-A decent chance there isn't proper joystick support
-A decent chance there is no commo rose
Missing = not being there at launch
Unless there's a new definition of "missing" in the English dictionary.
When I play the game on October 25th there will be:
-No in-game VOIP
-No battlerecorder
-One soldier per account
-A decent chance there isn't proper joystick support
-A decent chance there is no commo rose
which is absolutely astounding considering that some reports are claiming 12 million people playing simultaneously across the platforms.
Are people still paying attention to zh1nt0?
Today's great news:
-You can only create squads in Battlelog, in game you can basically only switch squads.. but talking amongst the new squad probably won't have VOIP.
Wait....what?! Does that mean the retail client is still going to have the same shitty in-game squad management system?
post deleted -Oldie
My biggest complaint about one char per is that my son wants to play, and I don't want him screwing my K/D ratio.Holy fucking failblog, one characrter per game? ugh. I don't mind no in game VOIP, I use TS, Vent or Mumble. Joystick support is a big deal for the Jet whores not so much for Heli users. Squad management ? argh, so much for beta it was more like a demo of things to come.
Yeah I'll be still buying it (I guess) lol it's just reading these blogs and reports makes me cringe inside
My biggest complaint about one char per is that my son wants to play, and I don't want him screwing my K/D ratio.
Yeah, we were discussing it a few pages back, I loaded up origin and clicked the chat button and told the rep I was interested in canceling and explained that reason was because Amazon had the game for $42 dollar and the rep canceled it without any issue AND gave me a code for 20% off any future Origin purchases.
The only drawbacks to the Amazon order, at least that I can see, is that you don't get the unlock package (I think it is called the physical warfare pack) and you wont get the game until 10am Pacific instead of Midnight.
Don't get me wrong, my K/D isn't fantastic... I'm happy with maintaining ~1:1. I just don't want it to get worse!Quite, the opposite for me. When i'm visiting my brother, my nephew makes sure i log into my account so i dont mess up his k/d ratio in BC2.Thats old age for you, my quake twitch skills have diminished with age and maintaining a 2nd mortgage (my wife)
this makes me sad:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hspYel3WPjQ
Guided Shell (Tank) really? WTF! Whats next guided bullets from your gun?
Do you see why this game isn't a true BF game.....gimmicky shit like BC2
Im curious though, if you order from Amazon do you get the bonus maps as well for pre ordering?
edit
nm looks like it does, nice deal
why cant I play the beta anymore?