Nazo
2[H]4U
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2002
- Messages
- 3,672
Zap said:Weren't the FX5900XT and the FX5700U priced similar, with the 5700U having higher core/RAM speeds yet the 5900XT outperforming it?
Truth be told, I wasn't paying attention at that time. It is only more recently that I've finally decided it's well past time for me to upgrade past this old peice of junk. Like I said though, it might be possible to market based on a higher clock rate alone. Heck, intel does it. Lol, my current CPU is running ~ 2.4GHz and it can run circles around my grandmother's 2.4GHz P4. Really it could BEFORE I overclocked it this much. But most of you won't be surprised by this, this is old news really. (Just making a point.)
There's one problem though. That was a high model of the better card. This is the low end model. I'm sure that a 6800 Ultra will beat the crap out of 6600GT, but this is the crippled version of the 6800. The only major advantage I could find just based on the numbers was the memory bus. The 6600GT has a higher clocked core and memory. WIthout knowing more about that core itself, it's impossible to say for sure just by these numbers. It is newer, but, it was explicitely made to be low end for the "mainstream" user as they put it. I do believe that the memory must be better on the 6800 GT with that higher bandwidth bus though. The 6600GT does have GDDR3 memory though, so that makes it even harder to say. Lol, I'm confused to be honest. Just how can you tell short of actual benchmarks and real game tests (NOT doom 3 darn it.) I just keep hoping we'll find someone who knows more specifically about these things who could tell us a bit more about what to expect when comparing the two.