• Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
    Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.

Any worthwhile difference? 9600XT vs. 6600

S

shkmiami

n00b
Joined
Aug 27, 2004
Messages
25
Hi, I am wondering if it is worth it to upgrade to a Chaintech 6600 256MB AGP (for $145 at zipzoomfly.com) from my ATI AIW 9600XT. I am planning to play FarCry, Doom III, and Riddick pretty soon and I really don't want to the pay $200 for the 6600 GT version. I don't want to play it at 1600X1200. Just 1024x780 is fine for me with AA and AN enabled at highest settings.
So I guess this is a two part question:

1) Is it worth $145 to go from a 9600XT to a 6600? I mean is there enough performance difference to warrant the $145 upgrade?

2) Is paying the price difference between the 6600 and a 6600GT version (which in this case is approx $55) worth paying for?

I would really appreciate your answers.
 
I'd recommend going with a 6600 GT. The performance increase between the 9600XT and the 6600 might not be worth it. Of course, if you're willing to upgrade again in six months to a year, then go with either.
 
I'd say it's comparable to an upgrade from the 96xt to a 9700 np. Meaning your better off finding a used 9700 for less then $100 on ebay. I wouldn't drop $150 on the 6600, as it's seriously handicapped compared to the 6600gt
 
bountyhunter said:
I'd say it's comparable to an upgrade from the 96xt to a 9700 np. Meaning your better off finding a used 9700 for less then $100 on ebay. I wouldn't drop $150 on the 6600, as it's seriously handicapped compared to the 6600gt
Click to expand...

Wow, that's a big bitch slap against the 6600. I had naturally thought that the newest generation mid-range card would show a significant improvement over a last generation's mid-range card. Is the 6600 so gimped that is comparable to a last gen card?
 
no the 9700np is a pretty strong card and so is the 6600. i think the 6600 would be quite a bit better than the 9700, but the 6600gt which really uses newer technology, gddr3, is a huge jump from the 9600xt, which btw is not that bad
 
Honestly, the reason I don't want to spend the $200 for a 6600GT is because I missed out on that huge BestBuy sale two months ago for the vanilla 6800 for $200 AR which also included an OEM FarCry and a retail Half-Life 2. From what I read, some lucky bastards acutally got them for $180AR when using the Rewards Program card. Missing that sale really pisses me off and the only way I'll buy a 6600GT is if it is better than a 6800.
 
That seems a bit like cutting off your nose to spite your face, as the old saying goes. Whatever works for you though :)
 
Personally I would suggest going for the 6600 GT, but if you insist on the 6600 here is one reason to reconsider:

http://graphics.tomshardware.com/graphic/20041222/index.html

Although the 6600 128 MB version was used not ther 256 MB version, I doubt ther would be much difference. On on game you want to play, Farcry, the difference in framerate is nearly 30 FPS, quite a difference. I would suggest upgrading nonetheless. The 6 series just use newer shadeing models, engines, etc, that the older generation of cards such as the 9600 XT lack. You should notice a difference either way, but please seriously consider the 6600 GT.
 
^ I didn't know that was the case....if so I'd say then go ahead and get it. You should be able to find it cheaper, though.......
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top