Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
article said:while reducing the price of its GeForce GT 220 and GTX 460 768MB graphics cards
Too bad it's the 768MB ones. I want the Giger to drop.
Yeah, I don't know what the hell Nvidia is doing. It's like they completely forgot that the 1GB cards even exist. As the HD 5850 can be had for $260 out the door, and as little as $210 after MIR, it's time for Nvidia to act (before the awesome GTX 460 1GB launch momentum is completely lost to obscurity).
I'm glad I bought my 1GB card at release for $230 - right now, they're a terrible value, but at the same time the 768MB cards are just too memory-starved for some people to bite.
Too bad it's the 768MB ones. I want the Giger to drop.
Yeah, I don't know what the hell Nvidia is doing. It's like they completely forgot that the 1GB cards even exist. As the HD 5850 can be had for $260 out the door, and as little as $210 after MIR, it's time for Nvidia to act (before the awesome GTX 460 1GB launch momentum is completely lost to obscurity).
I'm glad I bought my 1GB card at release for $230 - right now, they're a terrible value, but at the same time the 768MB cards are just too memory-starved for some people to bite.
I'm sorry, but please show me a game/settings where the 460 w/o SLI that the 1GB card can run a playable frame rate on that the 768GB can not.
The timeline has been press event on Oct. 12 and launch on Oct. 21 for awhile now. I haven't seen anything indicate otherwise yet.
Sure thing:
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/Axle/GeForce_GTX_460_768_MB/27.html
See that setting 1650x1080 with 4xAA? It's arguably playable on the GTX 460 1GB! And if that's not fast enough for you, you have options: either overclock the card to 800 MHz (pretty easy and very high success rate), or drop the AA to 2x.
The 768MB card is screwed no matter what you try. You just can't run the 768MB card in some games with all the eye candy the GTX 460 GPU is capable of powering. And don't even think about 1920 with that anemic memory - the 1GB card can take it, but the 768MB can't.
If you don't play demanding games or you don't care about AA, the GTX 460 768MB is a decent purchase. But it will not perform well in future games, as there are already games on the market that can saturate it's local ram - so that makes it an iffy purchase.
I wouldn't go over 1680x1050 with 768MB, especially once you start cranking the AA.Anything over 1920x1200 is going to leave you wanting the 1GB. If you don't think you'll go even a little over 1080p, this generation, than go with the 768mb. Otherwise, the 1GB is required.
Also, multi-monitor gaming is where its at.![]()
Yep, AMD keeps nailing these hard launches, I'm impressed. NDA expires Oct. 21 and parts should be available in huge quantities that day, as far as I've heard.Paper launch fail.
Too bad it's the 768MB ones. I want the Giger to drop.
I'm sorry, but please show me a game/settings where the 460 w/o SLI that the 1GB card can run a playable frame rate on that the 768GB can not.
Yep, AMD keeps nailing these hard launches, I'm impressed. NDA expires Oct. 21 and parts should be available in huge quantities that day, as far as I've heard.
I wouldn't go over 1680x1050 with 768MB, especially once you start cranking the AA.
Yep, AMD keeps nailing these hard launches, I'm impressed. NDA expires Oct. 21 and parts should be available in huge quantities that day, as far as I've heard.
Hmm, it seems like a bad idea if this is true to delay your own launch till October 21st if your reasoning is 'Let's see what nVidia has up its sleeves and nVidia's new pricing' b/c then your playing more reactively and less proactive. It doesn't seem wise from a business approach. Let's let our competitor do something first and get credit and then we'll copy whatever they do?
Its like companies that follow the iPod or iPhone, their products may be better but somehow iPod/iPhone becomes a coin phrase and seen as being the 'original'?
So what's the future like?Yep, I'm on newegg right now ordering a Northern Islands Fusion Bulldozer system.![]()
So what's the future like?
The whole point is that there has never been any legitimate source anywhere that said products were being released on Oct. 12. That has always been the day of the press event (much like the aircraft carrier thing last year). The launch date and NDA lifting has been Oct. 21. If that changes, that will be something, until then, it's just reporters not having a clue.
I find it funny that there can be a "delay" for a product that hasn't been announced, or has ever had an "official" launch date announced. I've seen this before, and people will come up with all kinds of conspiracy theories. There is still wrong info in that article.
Yeah, but how are you suppose to generate clicks without posting fud?
Why didn't you just bring one back from the future?I just like poking you with a stick.
I'm actually looking at getting a 6770, so any delay sucks for me.
To the best of my knowledge, which is from consensus of hopefully not so shady leaks, if that's worth anything. I'd love for someone in the know to shed light on that thoughBut its good to know that Brent knows more then us, now to read too much into what he said... so the NDA lift on the 21st of October you say? Or is that information also classified?![]()
Why didn't you just bring one back from the future?![]()
The scientist in me cringes at the errors in that statement, and the debate enthusiast in me shakes his head at the lack of competition. Sad pandaI tried, but the future got delayed.![]()
So we get another month to wait for Southern Islands, while Nvidia releases some uber low performance GTX 430 card. ZzzzzzZzZ
The scientist in me cringes at the errors in that statement, and the debate enthusiast in me shakes his head at the lack of competition. Sad panda(anyway, back on topic, I suppose).
Relativity doesn't work that way, enjoy your botanyWell you see gravity can actually slow time, thus delaying the future. It's very simple really. I'm guessing you are more of a botanist.![]()
Relativity doesn't work that way, enjoy your botany.
You want to explain how you would then delay the future? Oh, you can't? You armchair physicists are either pitiful or funny, I can't decide which. Either way, let's get the thread back on topic and you two can stop competing to show how little you know about general relativity.