Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Forgot to mention, I've OCed to 3.7 on stock volts and got SMP2 running again. Current PPD: 12,300
hm. Is it worthwhile to boot ubuntu off a DVD? I'm sure the ubuntu GUI will hit the PPD a bit, but ubuntu is one of the the only distros I have any experience with at allThat should be able to do -bigadv
hm. Is it worthwhile to boot ubuntu off a DVD? I'm sure the ubuntu GUI will hit the PPD a bit, but ubuntu is one of the the only distros I have any experience with at all
I tried bigadv but couldn't get it running in a VM since VMWare won't allow a VM to be spawned with 8 CPUs since it only detects 6. I'm not interested in trying native linux at this point.
I heard the guys who got bigadv running on C2Q did some trickery to get the client to pull a bigadv. AFAIK, otherwise, the client needs to detect 8 CPUsHigh clocked core 2 quads can run -bigadv without HT. So I don't think you need 8 spawned cpus do you?
There is the EVGA distro available here: http://folding.braindancer.net/linuxrouter/VMWare-FAH-1.2.zipIs there a distro with FAH already built in? I see notfred, but it looks like his won't work on a CD or DVD with bigadv
Do you think manually setting -smp 7 or -smp 8 will cause it to download a bigadv?
I think I tried it last year and it worked. The EVGA VM also states upon startup that one of the flags that can be used is the -smp 7 flag. So, either it's still possible or this is something that linuxrouter included in his image at a time when it was possible. I remember reading something in the beginning of the year that Stanford was going to make it mandatory to have a minimum of 8 cores installed and detectable. EA would know more and has posted some info regarding this recently.Do you think manually setting -smp 7 or -smp 8 will cause it to download a bigadv?
I heard the guys who got bigadv running on C2Q did some trickery to get the client to pull a bigadv. AFAIK, otherwise, the client needs to detect 8 CPUs
I'm downloading ubuntu 10.04 now....
First person that gets TPF's from a Thuban (even just a "sneakernetted" WU) gets ONE tamale hand delivered by a walrus.
+
I tried bigadv but couldn't get it running in a VM since VMWare won't allow a VM to be spawned with 8 CPUs since it only detects 6. I'm not interested in trying native linux at this point.
here's some more:We better get some stats before this thread gets way out of control.
AMD cpu's throttle in the 60C's? That seams so weird considering I run my i7 at 80C 24/7. They're both 45nm, I didn't think there was that much difference between the different fab processes.
How is it than an i7 at 1.44 volts is almost impossible to cool while the little dual heatpipe with 80mm fan stock cooler can keep 6 cores at 3.7ghz and 1.44 volts all the way down at 52C? Even a water block on an i7 has trouble keeping 1.44 volts that cool.
here's some more:
3.7ghz
12,997 ppd
3:35 tpf
p 6012
How are these temps? This is with the stock cooler.
That is pretty sweet for the stock cooler, although you are running a bit too close to the ragged edge for my comfort. 3.7ghz is awesome for the 1055T.
I can't wait to see how far you will be able to push it once you put a better cooler on there like a Noctua.
I'll be curious too. Make sure you post temps once you get a chance. I think I could pull off an H50 in my Fusion.I just ordered the ram for my 1090T, so that should be here by thurs at the latest. Then we can see what it can do under my H50
That's essentially what I was going to say. Architecture makes as much difference to temperatures as process does.as far as the cooling.. different chip design under the heat spreader.. also having the Hyperthreading creates a lot of heat.. turn hyperthreading off then on and watch the difference in temp.. can be anywhere from 10-15C different.. also the IMC on the i7 creates a lot more heat then the phenom II's IMC..
nah its no where near the ragged edge on the phenom II's.. they dont heat up all that much and to even hit 60C would take another .10-.15v i mean even on my 940 the difference between 3 cores loaded and 4 cores loaded is a whole 2C.. running at 3.7ghz 1.52v @ 53C on a pos thermaltake Big typhoon heatsink..
but i cant wait to see what hat processor can do under the H50.. hopefully you can hit the 4.5ghz mark under 1.55v and 60C.. now that would be bad ass..
I just ordered the ram for my 1090T, so that should be here by thurs at the latest. Then we can see what it can do under my H50
I tend to be a bit conservative well doing anything these days, so I guess that is where we differ. I honestly don't know what happened to me, but I turned into a big wuss. I have become so afraid to take risks, that I wonder why I still consider myself a hardcore computer enthusiast..........
Under the stock cooler, my current Phenom II 965 can hit 59-60degrees when it was folding during the hottest part of the day. That was until I reverted it back to gaming only after getting my i7 rig. I remember that I got so incredibly worried because of AMD's 62 degree temperature limit. But doesn't AMD use the cpu case temperature and not the core? I think the T-case lagged behind by about 5-6 degrees........
Sweet! Can't wait!
what happened? you joined the real world where its no longer worth the cost of the screwing up wasnt worth the risk.. me on the other hand i have a long time left to make mistakes.. the day i actually screw something up to the point where i waste more money then it was worth actually overclocking something is the day ill quit doing it..
they may with the phenom II's since its only got a single temp but i know the phenom I's and athlon x2's used diode sensors..