AMD Dominates the Battlefield V Closed Alpha

Discussion in 'HardForum Tech News' started by rgMekanic, Jul 3, 2018.

  1. rgMekanic

    rgMekanic [H]ard|News Staff Member

    Messages:
    3,902
    Joined:
    May 13, 2013
    Despite Battlefield V being a full blooded GeForce game, the crew at PCGamesN is reporting that AMD is handily winning the battle for performance so far. They pitted the GTX 1060 up against the RX 580 8GB at both 1080p and 1440p, and the results were surprising, with the RX 580 being around 33% faster.

    While of course this is very early with plenty of time for more mature drivers to come out, this is still a pretty big surprise. Especially with the face that DICE and NVIDIA worked hand in hand on Battlefield V.

    In general graphics testing the GTX 1060 and RX 580 regularly trade benchmark wins, but normally only by the slightest of margins. With the Battlefield 5 closed alpha, however, there is a sizeable disparity in performance, with the RX 580 some 33% faster in our tests. That’s not the only bad news for Nvidia either, as the DirectX 12 implementation in the game does its GPUs no favours either.
     
    jnemesh, MrSneis and Master_shake_ like this.
  2. PureBlackFire

    PureBlackFire [H]Lite

    Messages:
    122
    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2012
    Nvidia will get right on top of that. the fps for AMD will be 30% lower when the game comes out.
     
    TurboGLH, blandead, John721 and 24 others like this.
  3. castlefire

    castlefire n00b

    Messages:
    51
    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2014
    ok lets see who is winning at 4K DCI gameplay? i could never go back and play at anything under 4K DCI
     
  4. M76

    M76 [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    9,346
    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2012
    WTF is DCI? The only dci I know of is "direct Common-rail Injection"
     
    Armenius, jnemesh, caddys83 and 4 others like this.
  5. SeymourGore

    SeymourGore 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,738
    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2008
    Lets see how your beloved Radeon GPUs handle Battlefield V after some Gameworks SFX are enabled, rgMekanic !
     
    atom, Nytegard, TurboGLH and 11 others like this.
  6. d8lock

    d8lock Gawd

    Messages:
    684
    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2012
    It's 4096 by 2160 instead of 3840 by 2160.
     
    Armenius likes this.
  7. FlawleZ

    FlawleZ Gawd

    Messages:
    810
    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2010
    So this would theoretically put RX 580 in 1070 territory or even faster in BFV. I'd be interested to see the Vega performance here. Idk maybe it shouldn't be posted or the 1080 Ti owners may have an aneurysm.
     
  8. velusip

    velusip [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,578
    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2005
    In the early days ATI cards were beating Nvidia with higher fps, but Nvidia were claiming that rendering shortcuts and missing features in ATIs pipeline were the reason. They argued with 'fidelity'. I would love to see that argument attempted this time around.
     
  9. Croak

    Croak [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,138
    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2006
    Could just be that Nvidia rolled out their deliberate 10 series and older performance degradations a bit early. They usually wait until the next series launches before they hobble the older cards.

    :)
     
    craigdt, velusip, fs123 and 15 others like this.
  10. PureBlackFire

    PureBlackFire [H]Lite

    Messages:
    122
    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2012
    this went both ways over the years. Nvidia leads the image quality cheating series 3-1 vs ATI/AMD.

    true. rumors are swirling that their new series will be out this month. hmm...
     
  11. haz_mat

    haz_mat Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    324
    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2012
    Meh, closed alpha with unoptimized drivers. Do AMD fanboys really want to claim a win here?
     
  12. Brokennails

    Brokennails [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,979
    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2006
    That can go both ways lol. Funny how logic works right....
     
    Armenius, Zuul, John721 and 6 others like this.
  13. Ferox

    Ferox n00b

    Messages:
    5
    Joined:
    May 1, 2018
    Or we could be dealing with another Assasins creed (directx 10.1) mishap where Nvidia makes the dev cripple any feature that runs better on AMD hardware. Gameworks just means Nvidia uses their shit tools and effects to make their own hardware look good. Nvidia will sacrifice innovation any day over allowing a competitors product to beat theirs. Its pathetic.
     
    Zuul, RobT, dragonstongue and 5 others like this.
  14. bos

    bos Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    188
    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2016
    Yeah, the alpha and beta for BF1 were nothing like the actual release hardware performance wise so I wouldn't read much into this. My 3570k and SLI 660tis killed in alpha and beta, but shit the bed come release barely keeping 50fps with lots of dips into the 20-30s.
     
  15. Nobu

    Nobu 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    3,193
    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2007
    Rather than unoptimized code, I expect it's (mostly) due to not having all effects enabled/working yet. This is alpha code we're talking about here. I doubt they've moved passed feature and gameplay bugs to graphical bugs yet.

    That's not to say they aren't fixing them, but I don't think that's the primary focus right now.
     
  16. rgMekanic

    rgMekanic [H]ard|News Staff Member

    Messages:
    3,902
    Joined:
    May 13, 2013
  17. sirmonkey1985

    sirmonkey1985 [H]ard|DCer of the Month - July 2010

    Messages:
    21,458
    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2008
    yeah the problem with dice "alpha" testing is that in BF3/1 they hard capped graphic settings to medium. wouldn't surprise me if they did it again with BF5. even my shitty sli 8800GT's were able to play BF3 alpha at 40-50fps, game release i got a whopping 15fps.
     
    lostin3d likes this.
  18. Chris_B

    Chris_B [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    4,997
    Joined:
    May 29, 2001
    Pish
     
  19. SighTurtle

    SighTurtle [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,412
    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2016
    Played the alpha, they didn't optimize much, had to run it at the lowest settings to enjoy 60+ fps, I have a 4690k and a 580. I don't like how PCGamesN didn't specify the graphic settings it tested for the GTX 1060 vs RX 580, would have been nice to compare with my experience. Also they state that the GTX 1080Ti ran at 114 fps at Ultra on 1080p, a little strange to test 1080p considering thats a 4k card if anything.
     
    lostin3d likes this.
  20. Naieve

    Naieve Gawd

    Messages:
    741
    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2010
    Every Developer hits both buttons and releases it prematurely.
     
    auntjemima and rgMekanic like this.
  21. MooCow

    MooCow [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    7,368
    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2000
    "The way it's meant to be played" might catch up.
     
  22. Brackle

    Brackle Old Timer

    Messages:
    7,227
    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Don't worry Nvidia will add gameworks, and AMD performance (and possibly Nvidia) Performance will tank.
     
  23. 04SVT

    04SVT 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,285
    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2004
    Wonder how it runs on the 1080...
     
  24. Trimlock

    Trimlock [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    15,150
    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2005
    My understanding is that it’s not running well on any hardware.
     
  25. gamerk2

    gamerk2 [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,616
    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2012
    Which indicates the game is probably sensitive to GPU memory bandwidth. That's the one area where ATI/AMD has always had an edge on NVIDIA.
     
  26. Trimlock

    Trimlock [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    15,150
    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2005
    Probably, would make a solid argument for the 580 over the 1060.
     
  27. Master_shake_

    Master_shake_ [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    9,198
    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2012
    a little bit of gameworks will fix that sticky wicket.
     
    Darth Kyrie, Zuul, DukenukemX and 2 others like this.
  28. 1-8-4-3-6-5-7-2 :D
    /Secret handshake
     
  29. HockeyJon

    HockeyJon [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,088
    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2014
    Anyone else love reading these threads just to see comments from fanboys who are so devoted to a video card company that they react as if someone insulted their own child?
     
    travm and Armenius like this.
  30. Trimlock

    Trimlock [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    15,150
    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2005
    Almost as if someone kicked their dog.
     
  31. Croak

    Croak [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,138
    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2006
    1-8-7-2-6-5-4-3 master race.
     
    N4CR likes this.
  32. Gideon

    Gideon 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,287
    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2006
    Oh were doing a thing, 1-5-3-6-2-4. Real diesels only have 6 ;)
     
  33. readeh

    readeh Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    276
    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2013
    Yeah it was really weird as my gtx 1080 was getting 150-180 fps in the beta, but only 110-130 fps at release, while graphics staying the same and looking the same. Later got a 1080ti and still couldn't get the fps I had with the 1080 in beta (n)
     
  34. readeh

    readeh Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    276
    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2013
    it's impossible to play on ultra settings with good fps, but perhaps titan V can do it. I'm getting good fps on low at around 125-145 fps with a 1070 and the game still looks good. Should have tried it on the wife's rig as it has a 1080ti, but will most likely snap up a 1180 before release(I hope).
     
  35. Krenum

    Krenum [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    15,530
    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2005
  36. sirmonkey1985

    sirmonkey1985 [H]ard|DCer of the Month - July 2010

    Messages:
    21,458
    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2008

    equal rights, yo.. can't kick one without kicking the other, it wouldn't be fair to both dogs.
     
  37. Trimlock

    Trimlock [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    15,150
    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2005
    #equaldogkickingrights
     
    Armenius, auntjemima and DukenukemX like this.
  38. M76

    M76 [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    9,346
    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2012
    Aren't the panel in TVs 3840x2160 pixels?
     
    Armenius likes this.
  39. spine

    spine 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,595
    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2003
    There'll be Volta hardware specific shit thrown in there too no doubt. :rolleyes:

    Count on it, there'll be some feature or effect that only Volta can do properly and tanks on everything else, including Pascal. Nvidia have no problems making their own cards look like shit if they're in a position to sell you better ones!
     
    sirmonkey1985 likes this.
  40. DukenukemX

    DukenukemX [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    4,394
    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2005