I'm looking at building a dual-GPU rig just for folding and testing. Basically, I'm going to disable any integrated graphics and run 1-2 nVidia Kepler-based GPUs on a 24/7 basis. For the most part, the CPU will only go off idle in order to feed data to the GPUs, and even a single-core processor is capable of doing this.
I'm looking for opinions on whether the G530 w/integrated graphics will pull less watts than the G555 under similar circumstances. Both are rated for 65w TDP, but I'm wondering if the G530 with IGFX will still need more watts than the G555 just because of architectural differences even with the IGFX disabled.
The cost between the two is negligible. I'm leaning towards the G555 under the assumption that it'll save me a few watts running 24/7, but am tempted by the lower clock-speed and existence of IGFX of the G530. I'm actually hoping to under-clock and under-volt (if easily done) either processor.
I'm looking for opinions on whether the G530 w/integrated graphics will pull less watts than the G555 under similar circumstances. Both are rated for 65w TDP, but I'm wondering if the G530 with IGFX will still need more watts than the G555 just because of architectural differences even with the IGFX disabled.
The cost between the two is negligible. I'm leaning towards the G555 under the assumption that it'll save me a few watts running 24/7, but am tempted by the lower clock-speed and existence of IGFX of the G530. I'm actually hoping to under-clock and under-volt (if easily done) either processor.