Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
An 8600GT would run it fine at lower resolutions. I run COD4 at 1680x1050 on an 8600GTS with all in game settings maxed, 16xAF and no AA. You should be able to find an 8600GT for around $100, or an 8600GTS for around $120 and the GTS is roughly 20-25% faster. To play at high resolutions he will need more GPU horsepower though.
It also depends on what settings he wants to run it in. I run COD 4 on a X800XL with 1680 X 1050 resolution and it runs great with normal trextures and everythign else on low/off. With an 8600GT he would be able to run at that resolution with higher settings than me, but not max.
1440x900 is the max res and an 8600gts would be good for COD4 at that res. the only problem is the 8600gts usually costs quite a bit more than the gt.Well he has a dell 19" widescreen monitor, not real sure what the max res. is on that. So what do you guys think? Would the 8600GTS be much better and more bang for the buck?
the 8600gt is fine for COD4 and max settings at 1024x768.
when he says "smacked around", he doesn't mean by small margin.Brent Justice said:
for COD4 the 3850 with 256mb would be perfectly fine up to 1600x1200 with up to 2x AA.Ok, so if I go with the 3850 would the 256mb one be good enough to run the game at decent res.?
3850 will suit his needs, COD4 is not too demanding, any midrange card would do just fine.
the 3850 is way better than the 8600gt and gts.I think the 3850 is better than the 8600GTS or is it 8600GT.
but I could be wrong.
Go check the 3850 benches vs the 8600 for comparisons.
if you actually had every setting at max then there were times that you went below 25 at that res. theres also no way you had AA on without some slowdowns. I basically have the same pc specs as you and played the demo at 1024x768 maxed out. I went below 30fps quite often with 2x AA enabled. the game was still smooth with AA but it was much better without it.I played through the entire game with all settings maxed at 1280x720 on a 8600GT coupled with 2GB RAM and an X2 5000+
It was smooth.. to be honest I didn't bother to check the FPS. Looked like it was running at 50-60FPS in most parts, but in intense areas I think it dropped to like 35-40.
I'm happy with the performance of this card... couldn't justify spending the money on a 8800GT with the kind of performance it gets in Crysis, so I'm waiting for the 9xxx series
if you actually had every setting at max then there were times that you went below 25 at that res. theres also no way you had AA on without some slowdowns. I basically have the same pc specs as you and played the demo at 1024x768 maxed out. I went below 30fps quite often with 2x AA enabled. the game was still smooth with AA but it was much better without it.
Brent Justice HD 3850 review said:We consistently saw [the HD3850] smacking around the 8600 GTS factory overclocked video card.
when he says "smacked around", he doesn't mean by small margin.
I think the 3850 is better than the 8600GTS or is it 8600GT.
but I could be wrong.
Go check the 3850 benches vs the 8600 for comparisons.