6200 or 9600pro

[wahoyaho]

which one will yield better performance on average?
and which manufacture should i go for? thanks.

 

[dajet24]

6200 non TC

 

[pxc]

6200 non TC

QFT

If possible, try to find a rev A3 NV43 core 6200.

 

[^eMpTy^]

http://www.gpureview.com/show_cards.php?card1=75&card2=192

Looks like the 9600pro is the better card to me...

 

[rcf1987]

I think th revision A3 can be modded to a 6600.

 

[Elios]

imo i just get a 6600GT and be done with it

 

[pxc]

http://www.gpureview.com/show_cards.php?card1=75&card2=192

Looks like the 9600pro is the better card to me...

Yeah, but that 9600 pro on average (no modifications) isn't going to overclock another 50-60MHz on the core or memory.

The 6200, even if it can't be unlocked, will overclock to 450-550MHz. None of the 5 NV43 core 6200s i have/had did less than 525MHz on the core or less than 650MHz on the memory, whether it unlocked or not (3 unlocked successfully, 2 didn't).

Unlocking is another frosted cake on top of the cake.

 

[wahoyaho]

would 128bit or 64bit matter much on this? and i should just gt the 128mb for 6200 right since 256 wouldn't do much for this card.

 

[pxc]

would 128bit or 64bit matter much on this?

that makes a huge difference. get a 128-bit card if you want to play games.

and i should just gt the 128mb for 6200 right since 256 wouldn't do much for this card.

yep, 128MB is enough.