Infaustium
Limp Gawd
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2008
- Messages
- 166
Alright, I just installed the 4870 just over an hour ago, replacing my 8800GTX, and I've got some questions.
1) Incorrect reading of specs?
Why is GPU-Z reading the memory clock at 900 when it should be 1800? Is it actually "doubled" due to the bandwidth on the 4870 (or something to that effect, which I think I remember seeing somewhere) and just not reading it as such?
Can someone clarify this for me?
Right now, RivaTuner does not work with the 4800 series, so I cant see what clocks etc. it would show for the moment.
2) GPU-Z readings (are these specs correct?):
ROPs: 16
Shaders: 320 Unified
Pixel Fillrate: 681.6 GPixels
Texture Fillrate: 681.6 G Texels
Bandwidth: 57.6
GPU Clock: 42,599 MHz
Memory: 900 MHz
Default Clock: 750 MHz
Memorey: 900 MHz
3) Visuals
Using AA and AF settings via the CCC produces far better results then using in-game settings. I don't know why, but I remember that always being the case. Maxed AA/AF in-game in HL2, for example, there's a ton of shimmering/crawling and aliasing. Maxing it via the CCC, and those things are gone.
F.E.A.R., however, AA & AF are a bit lessened using the CCC settings, but there's still a bit of tearing (regardless of v-sync) and no shimmering/crawling, but definitely still some aliasing.
TF2 has some crawling and slight tearing (again, regardless of v-sync enabled in-game) but looks relatively the same, from what I can tell. FRAPS never shows above 60 FPS, so it's still maxed at 60, just as in HL2 and Episodes.
4) Performance
I know F.E.A.R. is just a buggy game, as someone even mentioned to me again recently, but performance-wise, something is "wrong" here.
Why is my FPS dropping into the 30's when the action gets heavy?
I'm also getting to slight pausing at/in-between some action, turning some corners etc.
That's not much better than my 8800GTX, if any, and that should definitely not be the case, considering the 4870 is somewhere between the GTX 260/280 in performance, which trounces the 8800GTX.
I'm running 22" widescreen (1680x1060 res), with 8xAA and 16xAF, no soft shadows in F.E.A.R., but everything else maxed, as was with my 8800GTX.
I haven't tried Crysis to see the comparison from my 8800GTX because I no longer have it installed, and find it a pointless game to use as a test, because it's so buggy. But, I might attempt it, though after seeing what's happening to my FPS is F.E.A.R., there might be no point.
5) Temps
Perfect, once adjusting the fan speed. 50 @ idle and max of 58-60 @ load.
Feedback?
My wife was sitting here while I was testing some things (she's a gamer as well) and was also a bit shocked at some of the performance "issues", because she's seen me (and what I've run for her) many different GPUs and their performance.
I have to say, thus far, aside from some of the increase in visuals (which I expected from ATi), that I'm a little confused and annoyed here at some of the performance.
If the 4870 truly offers between 70-80% of the performance of the GTX 280, then it should be trouncing my 8800GTX, or at the very least, a decent improvement in FPS over what I'm seeing so far.
I've been greatly looking forward to moving back to ATi, but am a little "worried" over what I'm seeing here so far, in terms of performance, anyway.
Any feedback/info/ideas on all of my questions and experiences thus far would be appreciated. Mature and in-depth only, please
.
Thanks all, and looking forward to some good responses.
P.S.
Is there any prog that actually shows the amount of Stream Processors, of which there are supposed to be 800? GPU-Z doesn't, and I never remember RivaTuner showing such.
1) Incorrect reading of specs?
Why is GPU-Z reading the memory clock at 900 when it should be 1800? Is it actually "doubled" due to the bandwidth on the 4870 (or something to that effect, which I think I remember seeing somewhere) and just not reading it as such?
Can someone clarify this for me?
Right now, RivaTuner does not work with the 4800 series, so I cant see what clocks etc. it would show for the moment.
2) GPU-Z readings (are these specs correct?):
ROPs: 16
Shaders: 320 Unified
Pixel Fillrate: 681.6 GPixels
Texture Fillrate: 681.6 G Texels
Bandwidth: 57.6
GPU Clock: 42,599 MHz
Memory: 900 MHz
Default Clock: 750 MHz
Memorey: 900 MHz
3) Visuals
Using AA and AF settings via the CCC produces far better results then using in-game settings. I don't know why, but I remember that always being the case. Maxed AA/AF in-game in HL2, for example, there's a ton of shimmering/crawling and aliasing. Maxing it via the CCC, and those things are gone.
F.E.A.R., however, AA & AF are a bit lessened using the CCC settings, but there's still a bit of tearing (regardless of v-sync) and no shimmering/crawling, but definitely still some aliasing.
TF2 has some crawling and slight tearing (again, regardless of v-sync enabled in-game) but looks relatively the same, from what I can tell. FRAPS never shows above 60 FPS, so it's still maxed at 60, just as in HL2 and Episodes.
4) Performance
I know F.E.A.R. is just a buggy game, as someone even mentioned to me again recently, but performance-wise, something is "wrong" here.
Why is my FPS dropping into the 30's when the action gets heavy?
I'm also getting to slight pausing at/in-between some action, turning some corners etc.
That's not much better than my 8800GTX, if any, and that should definitely not be the case, considering the 4870 is somewhere between the GTX 260/280 in performance, which trounces the 8800GTX.
I'm running 22" widescreen (1680x1060 res), with 8xAA and 16xAF, no soft shadows in F.E.A.R., but everything else maxed, as was with my 8800GTX.
I haven't tried Crysis to see the comparison from my 8800GTX because I no longer have it installed, and find it a pointless game to use as a test, because it's so buggy. But, I might attempt it, though after seeing what's happening to my FPS is F.E.A.R., there might be no point.
5) Temps
Perfect, once adjusting the fan speed. 50 @ idle and max of 58-60 @ load.
Feedback?
My wife was sitting here while I was testing some things (she's a gamer as well) and was also a bit shocked at some of the performance "issues", because she's seen me (and what I've run for her) many different GPUs and their performance.
I have to say, thus far, aside from some of the increase in visuals (which I expected from ATi), that I'm a little confused and annoyed here at some of the performance.
If the 4870 truly offers between 70-80% of the performance of the GTX 280, then it should be trouncing my 8800GTX, or at the very least, a decent improvement in FPS over what I'm seeing so far.
I've been greatly looking forward to moving back to ATi, but am a little "worried" over what I'm seeing here so far, in terms of performance, anyway.
Any feedback/info/ideas on all of my questions and experiences thus far would be appreciated. Mature and in-depth only, please
Thanks all, and looking forward to some good responses.
P.S.
Is there any prog that actually shows the amount of Stream Processors, of which there are supposed to be 800? GPU-Z doesn't, and I never remember RivaTuner showing such.