Mayhempball
Limp Gawd
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2000
- Messages
- 376
Is the 23" apple cinema display any good for gaming? How would you guys rate this monitor.
Thanks
Thanks
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
id say the dell is equally as good and bigger, but then again ive never gamed on a 23 inch acdMayhempball said:Is the 23" apple cinema display any good for gaming? How would you guys rate this monitor.
Thanks
shadylx said:id say the dell is equally as good and bigger, but then again ive never gamed on a 23 inch acd
Mayhempball said:Is the 23" apple cinema display any good for gaming? How would you guys rate this monitor.
Thanks
I think the response time is 25ms which is to high for gaming...expect ghosting
I think we have a lot people responding that only use pcs and never seen how beautiful mac displays are. Apple designs these displays for graphic designers so they have to get color calibration right. In other words the colors are vibrant and beautiful. The blacks are black not dark grey. Go to your compusa and look at them. They are beautiful. I have the 2005fpw and have used mac displays before. I`m in graphic design. These apple displays are beautiful and my dell cant touch it. Btw 16ms is good enough for gaming. You wont see ghosting.Mayhempball said:Apple says it is 16ms, you guys may know more
msny said:I think the response time is 25ms which is to high for gaming...expect ghosting
Terpfen said:My monitor is 25ms and has no ghosting.
Mayhempball said:Is the 23" apple cinema display any good for gaming? How would you guys rate this monitor.
Thanks
sell it to some mac idiot, not imlying that all are idiots btw, for near $1k or more and buy a 2405 then profit. Better monitor, imo, bigger and cheaper plus extra cash.Mayhempball said:I picked one up for 600 dollars new, i am trying to see if i should go for it or cancel it.
Using that logic, all LCDs ghost since their grey to grey response time is alot higher. While it's true that all LCDs do blur, it's entirely possible for a 25ms monitor to blur less than a 16ms one.Happy Hopping said:that's not possible. Human eyes can see less than 60 frames/sec.
Thus 1/60 = approx. 16 ms.
25 ms is only 40 frame/sec., any human eyes can detect that.
QFMFTFanatik said:I think we have a lot people responding that only use pcs and never seen how beautiful mac displays are. Apple designs these displays for graphic designers so they have to get color calibration right. In other words the colors are vibrant and beautiful. The blacks are black not dark grey. Go to your compusa and look at them. They are beautiful. I have the 2005fpw and have used mac displays before. I`m in graphic design. These apple displays are beautiful and my dell cant touch it. Btw 16ms is good enough for gaming. You wont see ghosting.
Fanatik said:I think we have a lot people responding that only use pcs and never seen how beautiful mac displays are. Apple designs these displays for graphic designers so they have to get color calibration right. In other words the colors are vibrant and beautiful. The blacks are black not dark grey. Go to your compusa and look at them. They are beautiful. I have the 2005fpw and have used mac displays before. I`m in graphic design. These apple displays are beautiful and my dell cant touch it. Btw 16ms is good enough for gaming. You wont see ghosting.
I swear to god we so many ignorant people here. The price for mac displays IS justifiable. Don`t get mad because you cant afford one. To the untrained eye you dont see a diffference. Thats why you settle for Dell but to people like me who have been trained for design and color its very important.shadylx said:sell it to some mac idiot, not imlying that all are idiots btw, for near $1k or more and buy a 2405 then profit. Better monitor, imo, bigger and cheaper plus extra cash.
liquidtrance123 said:I love the amazing level of experience people have with apple before they open their mouths.![]()
i would say that 95% of the people who were tested between the two wouldnt know the difference. The price isnt that justifiable, even at a decent deal of $860 the 2405 is half the price of the ACD and is just overable better with maybe an exception of color. ive heard some reports of backlight leakage with the 23-30" ACD's as well so i still dont know if its worth it. My advice would be to sell it to someone like you and buy the 2405 then profit.Fanatik said:I swear to god we so many ignorant people here. The price for mac displays IS justifiable. Don`t get mad because you cant afford one. To the untrained eye you dont see a diffference. Thats why you settle for Dell but to people like me who have been trained for design and color its very important.
Originally Posted by Fanatik
I swear to god we so many ignorant people here. The price for mac displays IS justifiable. Don`t get mad because you cant afford one. To the untrained eye you dont see a diffference. Thats why you settle for Dell but to people like me who have been trained for design and color its very important.
First of all read the whole thread. Who were the ones that bashed the apple display without even knowledge of it? We are only here to set the facts straight.ozziegn said:no, whats really funny is how you Apple people love to cry and moan EVERY SINGLE TIME that someone says anything negative about any Apple product.
this has ALWAYS been the situation every single time that I've met up with an Apple person and we get into these heated debates.
why is that? are you people so insecure that you have to defend your Apple computer stuff as if it were your own child?
sheez.....![]()
you might be refering to me or even others but i didnt bash the apple, logically the dell has similar performance specs to the ACD, bigger and half the price with maybe slight less picture quality. With that in mind the dell is overall a better route to take, now if he gets it for that great price he should go for it, BUT i would sell it, buy a 2405 and spend the profit on some goodiesFanatik said:First of all read the whole thread. Who were the ones that bashed the apple display without even knowledge of it? We are only here to set the facts straight.
i live in socal so the last thing i need is heat, and also if crude hits $70 in the summer i dont think people will want heaters during the summer anyways.Happy Hopping said:Yeah, but if you use them, it can keep your room warm and save some money on heating oil, since crdue oil is hitting $70 this summer.![]()
Disco_Stu_04 said:Okkk n00bs....
I purchased the 1st generation for $2000 and bought the Apple Care warranty for $100...
and I just got it replaced with the new 2nd gen display for free.
Guess what, I spent $1000 on each screen.
Also, the Dell 24" is great and all, BUT IT IS THE SAME RESOLUTION as my Apple screen. I see as much as you do. My pixels are SMALLER and more FINE...less grain. (Also has better color than the Dell)
So, 24" is great, $800 price for the Dell is also great. But you guys assume and are making a pretty good a$$ of yourselves.
BTW, the 2nd gen is 16ms, same as the Dell. The first gen was 25ms.
yea your right, we shouildnt look at contrast, brightness, PRICE, size and value. Lets look at this way, the ACD is sleek and sliver and the dell is ugly and black /applementalityshocksyde said:toekiller, if you go by contrast and brightness specs, then you have some learning to do
shocksyde said:toekiller, if you go by contrast and brightness specs, then you have some learning to do
where will you pick it up from? 600$ new thats impossible for an Apple 23" Cinema....Mayhempball said:I picked one up for 600 dollars new, i am trying to see if i should go for it or cancel it.
Dell is bigger but the pix pitch is bigger as well .258 vs. .27 ....shadylx said:id say the dell is equally as good and bigger, but then again ive never gamed on a 23 inch acd
ozziegn said:equally as good?
try ALOT better than that over-hyped, over-priced Apple monitor.
the RT is 16ms and no ghosting at all .... Doom3 looks gorgeous on it .... you gotta to see it to believe it the colors are amazing ....msny said:I think the response time is 25ms which is to high for gaming...expect ghosting
bchomp said:Speaking as a person who has the 2405 and hasn't seen the Apple, I really think you'd need to see both of them and form your own conclusions. Response times can be radically overhyped - 12ms can be as bad or worse in a lot of cases. I've personally seen ghosting on my Dell in games, so don't trust people when they say that ghosting doesn't exist on it.
bchomp said:However it is worth noting that the 2405 is believed to use a newer generation of panel than the Apple.
agreed, but the Apple 23" has its own issues...serious issues....Fanatik said:I think we have a lot people responding that only use pcs and never seen how beautiful mac displays are. Apple designs these displays for graphic designers so they have to get color calibration right. In other words the colors are vibrant and beautiful. The blacks are black not dark grey. Go to your compusa and look at them. They are beautiful. I have the 2005fpw and have used mac displays before. I`m in graphic design. These apple displays are beautiful and my dell cant touch it. Btw 16ms is good enough for gaming. You wont see ghosting.