I don't understand what the fuss is about on the Intel 2.4C. It seems to me the only difference between a 2.4C and a 2.6C is the 2.6C having a better value due to just $5 more expensive than the 2.4C, but having 200mhz over 2.4C and 13x multiplier instead of 12x.
Would someone explain to me why 2.4C "seems" better, even though the math says different?
Please don't say it's better because it costs nearly as much. Mushkin PC3200 is more expensive than Mushkin PC3500 just because of hype =\
Would someone explain to me why 2.4C "seems" better, even though the math says different?
Please don't say it's better because it costs nearly as much. Mushkin PC3200 is more expensive than Mushkin PC3500 just because of hype =\