144 is the new 60?

Discussion in 'Video Cards' started by CAD4466HK, Mar 8, 2019.

  1. CAD4466HK

    CAD4466HK [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,185
    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2008
    Nvidia has adopted a new tactic for selling you a new RTX series video card.

    Wow just wow.

    https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/geforce/news/geforce-gives-you-the-edge-in-battle-royale/
     
  2. horrorshow

    horrorshow [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    6,405
    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2007
    I'd like to see more thorough testing on this.

    BUT, I can confirm when I play Black Ops II or Overwatch with a cap of 120, my K/D does go up and I feel "closer" to the game.

    - Just when I think everything's settled down, 1440p/120+Hz becomes the new carrot..
     
    viscountalpha likes this.
  3. vividshock

    vividshock [H]Lite

    Messages:
    122
    Joined:
    May 31, 2014
    Tbh they're right to a degree
     
  4. Maddnotez

    Maddnotez Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    241
    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2014
    I noticed an improvement going from 60 to 144hz. I can't say it "increased my kdr" but it was a noticeable difference for me.
     
    /dev/null and CAD4466HK like this.
  5. CAD4466HK

    CAD4466HK [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,185
    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2008
    Nvidia is basically telling you not to have RT enabled on their RTX cards if you want a high K/D.
    Whenever they decide to start adding it to games that is...
     
    SuperAnt, noko, KazeoHin and 3 others like this.
  6. cybereality

    cybereality [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    4,265
    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2008
    This is what I always assumed, running high refresh monitors for a long time. It's nice to see some data to back that up.

    I have bookmaked the page, and will be sharing it every time I hear someone say 144Hz is placebo or that the human eye can't see past 60fps, or other such nonsense.
     
    Araxie and Geforcepat like this.
  7. Rvenger

    Rvenger [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,659
    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2012

    That will change to. "See your enemy in the reflection of the puddles and maximize your game with RTX"
     
    F.E.A.R., noko, xmadror and 2 others like this.
  8. ZeqOBpf6

    ZeqOBpf6 Gawd

    Messages:
    585
    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2014
    lol for the love of god don't try and use this as some ace up the sleeve

    a 44% increase in KDR by doing nothing but going from 60 to 144? Stupidest fucking claim I've ever heard anyone make.
     
    euskalzabe, Aireoth, SvenBent and 3 others like this.
  9. cybereality

    cybereality [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    4,265
    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2008
    But it's not just a claim, they are showing real data to back it up.
     
    leadays likes this.
  10. CAD4466HK

    CAD4466HK [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,185
    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2008
    I have no dissolutions that 144Hz is better than 60Hz when it comes to image quality and smoothness, but according to this chart, I will never be as good as the guy with a 1070Ti etc. with my current gear in BR's. And I say that is utter bullshit.
    Marketing at it's finest.


    battle-royale-fortnite-pubg-increase-in-kd-hours.png
     
    FrgMstr likes this.
  11. [21CW]killerofall

    [21CW]killerofall Aliens...

    Messages:
    2,795
    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2006
    My KDR increased between 10% and 20% from a 1200P 60Hz fixed refresh rate monitor to a 1440P 165Hz G-sync monitor while using the same 1060 6GB GPU so high refresh definitely makes a difference.
     
    cybereality likes this.
  12. TangledThornz

    TangledThornz Gawd

    Messages:
    588
    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2018
  13. Furious_Styles

    Furious_Styles [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,142
    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2013

    Agreed. Come on guys we're too smart to be fooled by this bullshit. This is coming from a guy who loves high refresh rates and prioritizes famerates over visual quality. Which is why I know this is manipulated to look good. How do we know all of these players are playing on very low/low settings to optimize their FPS? I bet I could drop my refresh rate to 60hz in Apex and my K:D would be only slightly lower. I also wish they did not combine the data from the two games but instead kept them separate.
     
    FrgMstr and CAD4466HK like this.
  14. darrpara

    darrpara Gawd

    Messages:
    687
    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2011
    Moving from 60Hz 1080p to 144Hz 1440p ultrawide did up my KDR noticeably in BF5.

    Hard to say if it is due to the ultra wide being able to see more or the higher refresh rate.
     
    cybereality likes this.
  15. Deserving

    Deserving n00b

    Messages:
    24
    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2015
    There are several points that are conveniently left unaddressed in their 'real data'. Such as, those who play more, likely become better at a game and higher framerates likely lead to a better reaction time. This is not a phenomena exclusive to Nvidia cards nor is it news. AMD and Nvidia always have the most deceptive slides when it comes to their marketing.

    Also of note, they bundle it as 1080/Ti, does this mean 1080 and 1080Ti? Because the difference between a 1080 and 1080Ti in the games they list is roughly 30-40 fps depending on resolution.
     
  16. ZeqOBpf6

    ZeqOBpf6 Gawd

    Messages:
    585
    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2014
    I can make a chart, too. I mean, I can't, but somebody out there can! Does that make it real data?

    What we're looking for is called the scientific method, and it's not present. They don't even attempt to mention anything about their testing methodology. While I don't feel that every single piece of data should go through peer review before it can even be considered remotely possible, people should always be HIGHLY skeptical of testing when performed by a group that isn't neutral, 100000000000000000x moreso when it's performed by people trying to sell you the very product they're saying is great! Come on!

    I hope you aren't getting all your diet advice from natural-healthy-proven-supplements-for-wellness.zl/notascam too
     
    euskalzabe, noko and FrgMstr like this.
  17. cybereality

    cybereality [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    4,265
    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2008
    But is it really that hard to believe?

    That people with better performing hardware can perform better in a competition played on that hardware.

    Seems like a pretty straight forward proposition.
     
    elite.mafia and Nytegard like this.
  18. horrorshow

    horrorshow [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    6,405
    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2007
    I definitely had an "Ohhhhh" moment when I enabled Fast-Sync and capped the fps at 120 in several games.
     
    cybereality likes this.
  19. ZeqOBpf6

    ZeqOBpf6 Gawd

    Messages:
    585
    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2014
    Now you're just shifting goalposts. Their "data" shows KDR going up 44% by switching to 144fp and 2x kdr by going to a 2080ti+144fps

    in otherwords

    LOL
     
    {NG}Fidel likes this.
  20. pendragon1

    pendragon1 [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    11,654
    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2000
    I call bullshit. it will help a bit but its the hours put in that really raises a k/d
     
    CAD4466HK likes this.
  21. Domingo

    Domingo Skip My Posts

    Messages:
    16,764
    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2004
    Not sure if I buy what they're saying, but I look forward to the day when mainstream TV's can do above 60Hz.
     
  22. sleepybp

    sleepybp Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    367
    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2014
    Here's a thought.
    Maybe the 1080P 60 hz players are casuals and therefore have "decent" k/d ratios
    Those who are more serious about gaming spend more money to play on the best (1440P 100 hz+). Their K/D ratio is likely better bc they play more often and are serious gamers.
    Those who play on 240hz+ are HARDCORE and spend top dollar. These are the 1 percenters in competitive gaming. They don't have the best k/d bc of their gear. But their awesome gear is a reflection of their investment in gaming (time, experience, money spent)
     
  23. Geforcepat

    Geforcepat Gawd

    Messages:
    882
    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2012
    Yeah, 120+ does make a difference but even more so with Gsync and 144. and i just hit a comp score of 2500 in ow. so it helps.
    1080 w/original rog swift @ 1440p 144hz
     
    cybereality likes this.
  24. Arcygenical

    Arcygenical Will Watercool for Crack

    Messages:
    24,691
    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2005
    This is called third variable, and is exactly why Correlation and Causation aren't necessarily related. And I agree entirely with the assertion that those more serious about their games, likely spend more money on better gear.
     
    bluesynk and FrgMstr like this.
  25. Krenum

    Krenum [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    15,256
    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2005
    Coming from a 60hz monitor to 144hz I would agree. Its a whole new world.

    My recent "Oh shit" moment was playing UT99 & UT 2004 at 144Hz with Gsync. It was like a new game.
     
    Pirx, mikeo and cybereality like this.
  26. mikeo

    mikeo Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    289
    Joined:
    May 17, 2006
    On my 55" OLED for games like BO4 I do better at 1080p 120hz vs 4k 60hz.
     
    cybereality likes this.
  27. cybereality

    cybereality [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    4,265
    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2008
    Yeah, when I got my first 120Hz screen, I was still playing UT2004 and it was incredible. Somehow the graphics on those old games still hold up.

    If you want to play an older game, I would recommend the F.E.A.R. series. The graphics are still nice on full max settings high refresh.
     
    Pirx and Krenum like this.
  28. Krenum

    Krenum [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    15,256
    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2005
    Been thinking of playing the first one again. Never finished it. Good call!
     
    cybereality likes this.
  29. M76

    M76 [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    8,942
    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2012
    correlation is not to be confused with causation
     
  30. Zarathustra[H]

    Zarathustra[H] Official Forum Curmudgeon

    Messages:
    27,649
    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2000

    This.

    Don't get me wrong. I'll take higher frame rates if I can get them, but the difference is - IMHO - much more subtle than instantly better performance in game.

    Because of this I haven't bothered with frame rates above 60 fps since back when I was very much into Counter-Strike and vsynced my GeForce 3 Ti 500 and my 22" Iiyama Visionmaster Pro 510 at 1600x1200 and 100hz.

    There are many alternate explanations to the correlation than causation. For instance, on average people who spend more on better hardware tend to be those who care more about games, and thus play more and get more practice. That's just one, but there are many.
     
    Last edited: Mar 9, 2019
    SvenBent, CAD4466HK and Auer like this.
  31. FrgMstr

    FrgMstr Just Plain Mean Staff Member

    Messages:
    48,434
    Joined:
    May 18, 1997
    If we did this "study," we would be laughed out of the business, and I cannot even imagine what our detractors would say. This data is so flawed... That said, the marketing department gets major kudos. Great angle.
     
  32. Brackle

    Brackle Old Timer

    Messages:
    7,252
    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
  33. tangoseal

    tangoseal [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    6,901
    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2010
    I play all FPS on a 240hz display.

    60 thru 144 feel like im dragging sledgehammers through swamp mud after using 240hz.

    I think nVidia is off their rockers but I agree as a user that that higher = better, then there is the raw skill factor. Some people are just not good at fast games.
     
    Pirx, cybereality and legcramp like this.
  34. legcramp

    legcramp [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    10,780
    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2004
    Well this data is common sense..... now where is the RGB to FPS/Refresh-rate research.
     
  35. defaultluser

    defaultluser I B Smart

    Messages:
    12,144
    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2006
    I already knew this when I was a CRT gamer. In addition to the flicker, I could easily see the smoothness difference between 60Hz ad 85 Hz.

    That's why I stayed on CRT for so many years. There is a difference!

    I can't really see a difference between 85 Hz and 120hz (let-alone 240 hz), even on fast modern panels, but I figure it's just marketing to the 0.1 percenters at that point.
     
    Zarathustra[H] likes this.
  36. TFchris

    TFchris [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,069
    Joined:
    May 27, 2012
    I feel 120Hz is the new 60Hz, where as 144Hz is the new 75Hz, and 155/165Hz OC monitors are like the old (A-) korean panels that can OC to 95 Hz but can't quite hit 120Hz.

    And of course 240hz is the new 120Hz lol

    This is just me rambling about nothing :D
     
  37. Captindecisive

    Captindecisive Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    157
    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2017
    This is why I need to save articles.

    There is an incredibly in depth, technically detailed, page somewhere (oh I'll find you again and post you!) that explains exactly why this works. While it is just a marketing scheme/angle that nVidia pulled, the technical data behind high fps giving you an edge is there to back it up (unless the game has a hard cap, or breaks because of it).

    That said, 60hz feels awful when you've played everything at 100 and above for a while.
     
    cybereality likes this.
  38. PhaseNoise

    PhaseNoise [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,307
    Joined:
    May 11, 2005
    60 Hz is really bad for anything which requires reaction. Heck, even in wow the difference when I went high-refresh was HUGE to me.

    Now to be fair, I don’t really perceive any useful difference above about 90 fps. But that’s me, and I’m old. I’m sure young people with good vision could see 120 easily. High refresh really is amazing IMO.
     
    cybereality likes this.
  39. bluesynk

    bluesynk Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    204
    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    So what other meaningless things would also show this bump in k/d...RGB case lighting, cost of pc, number of games owned, amount of snacks consumed, beverages drank, total farts released, anything indicating an increase in time played right?
     
    Last edited: Mar 11, 2019
  40. PhaseNoise

    PhaseNoise [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,307
    Joined:
    May 11, 2005
    So - you're saying getting an updated view into the game state more frequently is... on the same field as the lighting you choose for your case?

    Are you being serious?
     
    cybereality likes this.