M76
[H]F Junkie
- Joined
- Jun 12, 2012
- Messages
- 14,039
I don't follow. People complained about the ending and to some this meant that the entire game is crap. The point is that even when gamers complain you can't be sure if what they are complaining about is valid.But you're talking about the ending, after having had played the whole game...?
After Anthem I would be surprised if behind the scenes EA isn't already scrambling to get Mass Effect revived.Hey, I loved both; even played Andromeda on Normal --> Hardcore --> Insanity back to back because I flat out liked playing it. I also didn't catch even a whiff of the annoyances that 'influencers' found, though I don't put much stock into my own opinion here due to my very apparent bias.
The main point is that neither really lived up to their commercial expectations, so much so that EA abandoned Andromeda's planned sequels. A move today which seems pretty stupid, but it's EA.
Let me get this straight, you are saying that diablo is a casual game? While I never played it myself but seem to recall that the people playing it were hardcore. And it had pretty high hardware demand for the time. I remember trying to run Diablo 2 and my computer wasn't good enough for it.A point I've already tried to make (somewhere) -- Diablo has never been a 'current gen game' in terms of graphics. Both because that's not Blizzard's art style (or their art style doesn't require it), but also because their target market is much broader than those that would buy AAA-games at least partially for their graphics. The same can be said for stuff like Overwatch, Starcraft, or properties from other companies like Valve's DOTA 2 or Riot's League of Legends. The latter two which play decently well on modern integrated graphics hardware.