Wow....someone actually got paid to research that and write up the article.
Damn nvidia marketing working overtime:
"Study finds serious gamers that spend more money on their computers have higher K/D ratio's"
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wow....someone actually got paid to research that and write up the article.
Just because someone disagrees with the premises (and then likely the conclusions) of the article doesn't mean they are inherently biased. It's not biased to call something bullshit that's bullshit. All you need to see is that graph comparing a GTX 6XX series to a RTX 20XX series to see the bullshit. The GTX 680 was released 7.5 YEARS ago. So his comparison isn't that far off from what Nvidia is trying to demonstrate.
I wasn't someone who put too much stock in this kind of thinking back in the day. I was at 60Hz for years and did fine in multiplayer games. I always believed that as long as your FPS is consistent, you can get used to it and that's what mattered most. Perhaps that's actually still true to a degree. However, going to a higher refresh rate display did in fact, improve my K/D. I don't think dropping to 60Hz will make a good player bad and I don't think going from 60Hz to 144Hz will make a bad player good. It makes a difference, but it won't make someone into something they aren't.
And what if AMD had commissioned the exact same study? You have an anti-nVidia Bias so your response is expected and contributes nothing to the actual topic.
You can argue, or even expect, that a companies' slide or interpretation may be biased, but that doesn't change the fact the the poster I mentioned has his own bias (which is well known. proof: just search his posts).