i have a 4090 - i allways use DLSS quality if it's available - it kinda looks the same.. and usually with a better framerate.
i have a 4k240Hz monitor - so can allways use more frames. or less noise if it's an older game that runs closer to the 240Hz.
I actually thinks that a game like horizon...
Yes, i used a 75 inch Q90 before, it was quite good, i think that the QN85A is quite a bit better - black levels look a lot closer to Oled - but won't compare - that being said, it's the closest i have seen.
I used both for shield streaming, PS5 and my 3090 gaming.
the reason (as i understand...
i also kept my Q90R at standard - but i use my QN85A on High - it has a way better algoritm for the dimming zones - and produced a way better result.
that being said - having 1100+ zones vs the 60ish also helps tremendously..
hi, you can read about input lag here:
https://www.rtings.com/tv/reviews/samsung/qn900a-8k-qled
they say 6.0 ms at 4k120
also, the contrast ratio is a lot higher on the samsung with local dimming enabled.
i had a 65 Q90R and i changed that for a 85 inch QN85A (the 85" model that has a VA...
damn, am i the only one wating this model as aloy now? that would rock - imagine the very limber climbing bit from the first game.. done by this little cutie :)
but then, only if it's the same day 1 as the console release?
i'll admit - i am stoked to play some of the PS exclusives - i have bought both HZD and days gone - i say bring 'em on!
i dont care if someone, somewhere allready had that experience.. it does not sour my experience..
Followup...
well, both our answers where wrong..
OP did not want VA, so the only reason i suggested that was because of the quick pixels, it feels more like a TN
and OP really did not want 4k..
4k is nice, but not for everybody.
my perfect screen would be next gen g7 32" 4k VA - i would never personally...